-
-
- I think I prefer the old mascot of Dr. Tux rather than Beach boy Tux. In
- fact one has the impression of having seen it elsewhere. Personally, I am
- for re-establishing Dr. Tux.
-
- As soon as Burns gets some time, that is the plan. the current penguin is
- just a stand-in.
-
-Is it
On Apr 4 burns was heard saying:
-On April 2, 2002 06:59 pm, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
-
-
- I think I prefer the old mascot of Dr. Tux rather than Beach boy Tux. In
- fact one has the impression of having seen it elsewhere. Personally, I am
- for re-establishing Dr. Tux.
-
- As soon as Burns
On April 2, 2002 06:59 pm, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
I think I prefer the old mascot of Dr. Tux rather than Beach boy Tux. In
fact one has the impression of having seen it elsewhere. Personally, I am
for re-establishing Dr. Tux.
As soon as Burns gets some time, that is the plan. the
On Apr 1 Net Llama was heard saying:
-Fellow Pengiuns,
-The SxS editors are in the process of reworking the layout design of
-the SxS site to make it more usable for everyone. Here's out latest
-proof of concept:
-http://hunley.homeip.net/sxs/parent.html
*** Wow, remembering how it started
Zoran spewed electrons into the ether that assembled into:
It looks sleeker. The little 3D file icons next to each group link are
a nice idea.
thanks
Compared to the old site the new one looks like its corners have been
rounded without touching the house style. That is very good.
I concur
On Apr 2 Douglas J Hunley was heard saying:
snip
- Furthermore the icon on the home page is a bit too small for laptop
- screens. Even with a 1024 resolution, the icon does not render very well,
- misses detail and looks a bit unsharp.
-
-which? the miniature version of the splash image?
***
Fellow Pengiuns,
The SxS editors are in the process of reworking the layout design of
the SxS site to make it more usable for everyone. Here's out latest
proof of concept:
http://hunley.homeip.net/sxs/parent.html
Please provide feedback, whether negative or positive. If you don't
like any of
Net Llama wrote:
Fellow Pengiuns,
The SxS editors are in the process of reworking the layout design of
the SxS site to make it more usable for everyone. Here's out latest
proof of concept:
http://hunley.homeip.net/sxs/parent.html
Please provide feedback, whether negative or positive.
I must echo Aaron's comment about resizing. In IE it resizes to taller than
my display (and narrower), but thinks it is at full size. So it won't
scroll the data up and down. I have to shrink it and then click on full
screen in order to get it to behave correctly.
Other than that, the look
Net Llama spewed electrons into the ether that assembled into:
Its not you. This is what is causing it to happen:
function resize_view()
{
window.resizeTo(880,980)
}
I'm not entirely sure why we need this, so we'll look into removing
and/or fixing that.
I put it there to
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
Net Llama spewed electrons into the ether that assembled into:
Its not you. This is what is causing it to happen:
function resize_view()
{
window.resizeTo(880,980)
}
I'm not entirely sure why we need this, so we'll look into
Net Llama! spewed electrons into the ether that assembled into:
OK, but why would you want a minimum of 880x980? If our target is someone
with 640x480 or 800x600, we're already missing that mark with your
settings.
I know. :(
Because the 880 is the minimum I found to hold the new top
Condon Thomas A KPWA spewed electrons into the ether that assembled into:
Other than that, the look and feel is good, if it weren't for all the
404's! ;-}
obviously, I was gonna copy all the content over until we had a design down.
hence the 404s... the main impetus was redesigning the look
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Finally, have you considered using PHP (or any other script language)??
YES. We *cant*. Think of our mirrors. We've been down this road *many* times
(on the editors list, so you didn't know). Some of our mirrors are nothing
more than their user
I don't care for that middle frame. What's it for? And it's resizable in
case it's not supposed to be. You can shrink it upward. I think the mirror
and the editor tables might look better with a white background. But
that's minor. The big thing for me is that middle frame.
Bill
On Monday 01
On Mon, 01 Apr 2002 19:19:03 -0300
begin Federico Voges [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
[snip]
I know I might be getting a bit off topic with this, but I think it's
worth giving it a thought.
You can't use scripting because of the mirrors. BUT, you can still use
scripting to generate
The middle frame is supposed to be for each mirror to include any unique
content branding stuff.
Just curious, which browser did you use (or do you prefer)?
thanks for your feedback!
-Net LLama!
--- Bill Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't care for that middle frame. What's it for?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Not exactly. With the script approach, you can add common HTML code to
the article: header, footer, etc. With CSS you can't.
Likewise, you can even create a WAP page, or an HTML page tuned for
AvantGo. Again, with CSS you can't.
Another
Mr. David Bandel
He he, I have I puffed you up some? David I like your css idea, but
some of us just do not know how. I for one would like a little instruction
here. Currently I am doing some html javascript for a college class, and
learning something new at the same time would be great.
I use galeon. Not the latest. I should upgrade galeon and mozilla.
Although I've been told that if I try the latest mozilla milestone, I
wouldn't use galeon. I mainly prefer galeon because of it's ability to
disable pop-ups.
Bill
On Monday 01 April 2002 05:56 pm, Net Llama wrote:
The middle
On Monday 01 April 2002 06:57 pm, Net Llama wrote:
--- Bill Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use galeon. Not the latest. I should upgrade galeon and mozilla.
Although I've been told that if I try the latest mozilla milestone, I
wouldn't use galeon. I mainly prefer galeon because of it's
On April 1, 2002 01:53 pm, David A. Bandel wrote:
Do you know of a good site that does a CSS for dummies type
tutorial. Actually it doesn't even have to be watered down, just
something for people who know HTML, but know nothing about CSS, and
want to learn the basics quickly.
David A. Bandel spewed electrons into the ether that assembled into:
Wrong answer. The beauty of CSS is that CSS is all about markup/content
separation. In Lynx all you see is the content, not any markup. And for
whatever reason, content displays _much_ better under Lynx with CSS.
it does?
Bill Davidson spewed electrons into the ether that assembled into:
I don't care for that middle frame. What's it for? And it's resizable in
case it's not supposed to be. You can shrink it upward. I think the mirror
and the editor tables might look better with a white background. But
that's
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 20:30:24 -0500
begin Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
David A. Bandel spewed electrons into the ether that assembled into:
Wrong answer. The beauty of CSS is that CSS is all about
markup/content separation. In Lynx all you see is the content, not
any
--- Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Davidson spewed electrons into the ether that assembled into:
I don't care for that middle frame. What's it for? And it's
resizable in
case it's not supposed to be. You can shrink it upward. I think the
mirror
and the editor tables might
On Mon, 01 Apr 2002 17:31:44 -0300
Federico Voges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BIG SNIP
I second Frederico's post...
Best
Peck
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and
27 matches
Mail list logo
