On Sat, 15 Mar 2003 19:48:15 -0700
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome to the dark side! grin
Darkness before the dawn.
--
++···+
· Roger Oberholtzer · E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]·
· OPQ Systems AB
On Fri, 07 Mar 2003 17:49:52 -0500 Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it looks like I'll be spending some effort to swap out some OpenLinux
boxes pretty soon. Principles you know...
Can someone tell me, which of the various distributions are closest to
OpenLinux in as far as
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003 21:04:00 -0500
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 07 Mar 2003 17:49:52 -0500 Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it looks like I'll be spending some effort to swap out some OpenLinux
boxes pretty soon. Principles you know...
Can someone tell
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 17:08:09 -0700
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 10:29:25 +0100
Roger Oberholtzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 15:20:59 -0700
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm surprised that no one has done it yet. It would not
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 15:20:59 -0700
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm surprised that no one has done it yet. It would not be a matter of
rocket science to distribute a gentoo based distribution from one or
more (different architecture) base home system. Creating binary update
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 20:33:28 -0800
Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 05:11:23PM -0800, Ted Ozolins wrote:
Oh I think there are a lot of refugees from the rpm farm on this list:)
I left rpm behind a while back, been using mainly Slackware and of
course that
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
The problem is that RPM limits itself to the package in question. emerge
takes the next step and defines the relationship between packages. And,
instead of just stopping and saying something is missing so bugger off
and sort that out and don't return until you do, as rpm
On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 07:29:39 -0800
Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
The problem is that RPM limits itself to the package in question.
emerge takes the next step and defines the relationship between
packages. And, instead of just stopping and saying
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 10:37:52AM +0100, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
..
The problem is that RPM limits itself to the package in question. emerge
takes the next step and defines the relationship between packages. And,
instead of just stopping and saying something is missing so bugger off
and sort
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 10:29:25 +0100
Roger Oberholtzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 15:20:59 -0700
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm surprised that no one has done it yet. It would not be a matter of
rocket science to distribute a gentoo based distribution from one
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 22:57:43 -0800
Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:49:52PM -0500, Jerry McBride wrote:
Well, it looks like I'll be spending some effort to swap out some OpenLinux
boxes pretty soon. Principles you know...
Can someone tell me, which of the
begin Collins Richey's quote:
| They've finally caught up with gentoo grin
they're a pain in the ass, but they're not *that* bad.
--
dep
http://www.linuxandmain.com -- outside the box, barely within
the envelope, and no animated paperclip anywhere.
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:02:50 -0500
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
begin Collins Richey's quote:
| They've finally caught up with gentoo grin
they're a pain in the ass, but they're not *that* bad.
Filing away in my almost humor folder.
--
Collins
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:02:50AM -0500, dep wrote:
begin Collins Richey's quote:
| They've finally caught up with gentoo grin
they're a pain in the ass, but they're not *that* bad.
I haven't tried gentoo, LFS, or any of the other do-it-yourself forms of
Linux, primarily because I would
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 07:54:24 -0700
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 22:57:43 -0800
Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:49:52PM -0500, Jerry McBride wrote:
Well, it looks like I'll be spending some effort to swap out some
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:09:12 -0800
Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:02:50AM -0500, dep wrote:
begin Collins Richey's quote:
| They've finally caught up with gentoo grin
they're a pain in the ass, but they're not *that* bad.
I haven't tried gentoo, LFS,
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:09:12 -0800
Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:02:50AM -0500, dep wrote:
begin Collins Richey's quote:
| They've finally caught up with gentoo grin
they're a pain in the ass, but they're not *that* bad.
I haven't tried gentoo, LFS,
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:09:12 -0800
Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:02:50AM -0500, dep wrote:
begin Collins Richey's quote:
But that is exactly what gentoo is! It is very stable. Packages are deemed
stable or experimental by the
[ snips ]
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:13:25 +0100
Roger Oberholtzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 07:54:24 -0700
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 22:57:43 -0800
Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:49:52PM -0500, Jerry
On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 16:14:22 -0500
Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:09:12 -0800
Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:02:50AM -0500, dep wrote:
begin Collins Richey's quote:
But that is exactly
Feigning erudition, Collins Richey wrote:
% On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 16:14:22 -0500
% Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% Yes! I am so glad never to see RPM - I just emerge sync, emerge -up world
% and I see what I need to do. I've been using Gentoo for a couple of months
%
% God, I
At least we'll be running Gentoo G. And I'm not sure it can't be setup
for distribution as you pointed out.
Collins Richey wrote:
On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 16:14:22 -0500
Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:09:12 -0800
Bill Campbell
On Saturday 08 March 2003 17:29 pm, Collins Richey wrote:
Yes! I am so glad never to see RPM - I just emerge sync, emerge -up
world and I see what I need to do. I've been using Gentoo for a
couple of months
God, I wish I'd said that! Wait a minute, I did say that.
You better watch it,
Plonk away! I'm happy with Gentoo - finally a distro I don't have to spend
more time updating and searching for dependencies than using it G.
Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Saturday 08 March 2003 17:29 pm, Collins Richey wrote:
Yes! I am so glad never to see RPM - I just emerge sync, emerge -up
Collins Richey wrote:
Yes! I am so glad never to see RPM - I just emerge sync, emerge -up world
and I see what I need to do. I've been using Gentoo for a couple of months
God, I wish I'd said that! Wait a minute, I did say that.
You better watch it, Brett. They'll put you in the same
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 05:11:23PM -0800, Ted Ozolins wrote:
Oh I think there are a lot of refugees from the rpm farm on this list:) I
left rpm behind a while back, been using mainly Slackware and of course
that build_it_yourself_unmentionable_G oops I almost said it distro. What
I enjoy with
On 03/08/03 20:33, Bill Campbell wrote:
I read about the OpenPKG system in SysAdmin magazine late last year. It's
an RPM based system developed by Cable and Wireless in Europe to help them
maintain a large number of heterogeneous Unix and Linux systems for their
ISP operations.
Isn't CW the same
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:15:33PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote:
On 03/08/03 20:33, Bill Campbell wrote:
I read about the OpenPKG system in SysAdmin magazine late last year. It's
an RPM based system developed by Cable and Wireless in Europe to help them
maintain a large number of heterogeneous Unix
Well, it looks like I'll be spending some effort to swap out some OpenLinux
boxes pretty soon. Principles you know...
Can someone tell me, which of the various distributions are closest to OpenLinux
in as far as directory locations and system V startup scripts?
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 07 Mar 2003 17:49:52 -0500, Jerry McBride wrote:
Well, it looks like I'll be spending some effort to swap out some OpenLinux
boxes pretty soon. Principles you know...
Can someone tell me, which of the various distributions are closest to
Jerry McBride wrote:
Well, it looks like I'll be spending some effort to swap out some OpenLinux
boxes pretty soon. Principles you know...
Can someone tell me, which of the various distributions are closest to OpenLinux
in as far as directory locations and system V startup scripts?
I found
Feigning erudition, Jerry McBride wrote:
%
% Well, it looks like I'll be spending some effort to swap out some OpenLinux
% boxes pretty soon. Principles you know...
%
% Can someone tell me, which of the various distributions are closest to OpenLinux
% in as far as directory locations and system
On Fri, 07 Mar 2003 17:49:52 -0500 Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] professed:
Can someone tell me, which of the various distributions are closest to OpenLinux
in as far as directory locations and system V startup scripts?
Jerry,
I went to Slackware from Open Linux and haven't looked back.
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:49:52PM -0500, Jerry McBride wrote:
Well, it looks like I'll be spending some effort to swap out some OpenLinux
boxes pretty soon. Principles you know...
Can someone tell me, which of the various distributions are closest to
OpenLinux in as far as directory locations
34 matches
Mail list logo
