On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 15:45:01 -0500
Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No problem. I generated the configuration file with the lexmarkz53
> program, renamed it z53Photo.conf, and then edited the filter file to
> use that configuration file only, and renamed it z53Photo.sh
>
[ useful scripts
No problem. I generated the configuration file with the lexmarkz53 program,
renamed it z53Photo.conf, and then edited the filter file to use that configuration
file
only, and renamed it z53Photo.sh
First, the filter:
#!/bin/sh
DEBUG=0
PDIR=/usr/local/lexmark/z53
TMPFILE=`mktemp /tmp/lexmark.XXX
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 01:21:03 -0500
Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The z53Photo.sh is one I wrote myself. You won't have it. It is just
> z53.sh which uses a different configuration file, one that is
> configured for glossy photo printing.
>
Joel,
Would you have any problem with posting
Collins wrote:
Thanks for all the help; enjoy your rest; Happy New Year tomorrow.
Problem solved - ghostscript was gimped up. I emerged ghostscript
(7.05) again, and now the printer works like a champ.
Tomorrow I can get back to working with some scanned pictures.
It's really great to have a
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 02:16:31 -0500
Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One feature of this printer is that if a job arrives at it improperly
> formatted, the job just gets lost. I guess the printer just ignores
> it.
>
Thanks for all the help; enjoy your rest; Happy New Year tomorrow.
Probl
BTW, I'm heading to bed now, so, if you have any more questions tonight,
I won't see them for about 8 to 10 hours.
Joel
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 11:44:23PM -0700, Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 01:21:03 -0500
> Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The z53Photo.sh is one I wrote mysel
One feature of this printer is that if a job arrives at it improperly
formatted, the job just gets lost. I guess the printer just ignores it.
So, are you sure you have the lexmark driver installed properly?
At this point, I would go to the stepbystep (search filters hammer) and get
my article ab
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 01:21:03 -0500
Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The z53Photo.sh is one I wrote myself. You won't have it. It is just
> z53.sh which uses a different configuration file, one that is
> configured for glossy photo printing.
>
Yes.
> Can you run the lexmark configuration
The z53Photo.sh is one I wrote myself. You won't have it. It is just z53.sh
which uses a different configuration file, one that is configured for
glossy photo printing.
Can you run the lexmark configuration program, as
root, lexmarkz53?
It should be installed in /usr/local/lexmark/z53/ although
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 17:03:34 -0500
Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't offer much advice about cups. BTW, I gave up using CUPS when
> I had permissions problem with it. Who needs those things? lprng works
> fine. Why bother with the latest and greatest if the tried and true
> works f
I can't offer much advice about cups. BTW, I gave up using CUPS when
I had permissions problem with it. Who needs those things? lprng works
fine. Why bother with the latest and greatest if the tried and true
works fine? I still use ipchains.
I don't use gimp printer drivers either. lexmark suppli
Same problem I had with gimp-print. Have you tried foomatic & the
Lexmark drivers yet? Just curious, I have a fresh 1.4-rc2 system
compiling right now. It should be ready to set up printing next year :(.
Tom
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 09:13, Collins wrote:
> Steps taken:
>
> 1. Cable the printer
> 2
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 06:26:30 -0500
Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been using a lexmarkz53 for perhaps a year. It works great.
> The lexmark provided drivers work fine. I get excellent color photos
> with them.
>
> I use this printer attached to my linux box to provide print serv
I have been using a lexmarkz53 for perhaps a year. It works great. The
lexmark provided drivers work fine. I get excellent color photos with them.
I use this printer attached to my linux box to provide print services to
win98 and xp clients, as well as to the linux boxes. I don't use any lexmark
Tried gimp-print on Gentoo, but didnt have enough chicken feet to get it
working. Maybe I should try building Evolution on eDesktop 2.4? On
second thought, not enough chicken feet in the midwest to get through
that dependency hell. Gentoo has me spoiled (even without gimp-print).
Time to cut
Sorry about the doubled up messages, sent one from the wrong account
first & figured it would bounce.
need sleep.
ZZ
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 02:01, Tom Jandl wrote:
> Collins, my Z53 works on my older 1.4-rc1 Gentoo system.
> cat xxx >/dev/lp0 does NOT work. I'm using
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 11:24:26PM -0700, Collins wrote:
>Does anyone have one of these working on linux?
I've had one working for about a year now. Lexmark has drivers,
but gimp-print has better.
Bill
--
INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
UUCP: ca
ion last week,
& havent been able to get the Lexmark to work.
Havent figured out the problem yet.
Hope this helps!
Tom
-Forwarded Message-
> From: Tom Jandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Fw: lexmark z53 printer
> Date: 31 Dec 2002 01:03:1
ion last week,
& havent been able to get the Lexmark to work.
Havent figured out the problem yet.
Hope this helps!
Tom
-Forwarded Message-
> From: Tom Jandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Fw: lexmark z53 printer
> Date: 31 Dec 2002 01:03:1
Does anyone have one of these working on linux?
I just moved mine over from my windows machine, and it's a boat anchor.
Drat, I just got my epson 1660 scanner working, and nowhere to print.
Even cat xxx >/dev/lp0 produces no response.
Yes, lp0 was working with my hp lj1100.
This printer has a
20 matches
Mail list logo
