On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:34:49 -0800 Tony Alfrey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just wondered since I've been using 2.95.2 to compile virtually
> everything and nothing blows up so far. But then the stuff I
> compile isn't all that exotic. Kernels, kde, and now some Palm
> stuff.
>
I'm not aware
I just wondered since I've been using 2.95.2 to compile virtually
everything and nothing blows up so far. But then the stuff I compile
isn't all that exotic. Kernels, kde, and now some Palm stuff.
On Saturday 09 November 2002 08:40 am, Net Llama! wrote:
> uhh...Collin, its gcc-3.2, not gcc-2.3
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 09:33:16AM -0700, Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:42:43 -0800 Tony Alfrey
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 08 November 2002 02:32 pm, Ben Duncan wrote:
> > >
> > > All of these seems to be in the "rush" to go to the GCC 3.2
> > > compiler
> >
> > Why the ne
Ah thanks Lonnie ... I thought I had it wrong on calling it 3.2 .
Net Llama! wrote:
uhh...Collin, its gcc-3.2, not gcc-2.3.
On 11/09/2002 08:33 AM, Collins wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:42:43 -0800 Tony Alfrey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 08 November 2002 02:32 pm, Ben Duncan
uhh...Collin, its gcc-3.2, not gcc-2.3.
On 11/09/2002 08:33 AM, Collins wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:42:43 -0800 Tony Alfrey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 08 November 2002 02:32 pm, Ben Duncan wrote:
All of these seems to be in the "rush" to go to the GCC 3.2
compiler
Why the new com
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:42:43 -0800 Tony Alfrey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 08 November 2002 02:32 pm, Ben Duncan wrote:
> >
> > All of these seems to be in the "rush" to go to the GCC 3.2
> > compiler
>
> Why the new compiler?? What doesn't compile with 2.95.x ??
>
>
You might ask wh
[ snips ]
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 22:49:44 -0500 Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I tried 8.1 on a couple of machines and then backed it off... Too
> many things broken, and too many changes I didn't want (like CUPS).
> Not all of the problems were SuSE's fault but other things that
> br
begin Tony Alfrey's quote:
| I happen to be on the suse list also (but don't use it much).
| Ever since 8.1 came out, the amount of angst and problems seem to
| have risen considerably on that list. For you suse'ers, is this
| just new users or does it seem that 8.1 might have been a little
| "
On Friday 08 November 2002 02:32 pm, Ben Duncan wrote:
> Killedid my bread and butter - AppGen - Major problems on the GUI
> side. Other things (too many to recall) went kauput with my 8.1
> Install.
>
> Had to DOWNGRADE all the computers here back to 8.0
>
> SuSe 8.1 definately has it's share
On Friday 08 November 2002 07:03 pm, you wrote:
> Tony Alfrey wrote:
> > Hi
> > I happen to be on the suse list also (but don't use it much).
> > Ever since 8.1 came out, the amount of angst and problems seem to have
> > risen considerably on that list. For you suse'ers, is this just new
> > users
On Friday 08 November 2002 13:20 pm, Tony Alfrey wrote:
> Hi
> I happen to be on the suse list also (but don't use it much).
> Ever since 8.1 came out, the amount of angst and problems seem to have
> risen considerably on that list. For you suse'ers, is this just new
> users or does it seem that 8
On Fri, 08 Nov 2002 19:03:25 -0500 "Leon A. Goldstein"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tony Alfrey wrote:
> > Hi
> > I happen to be on the suse list also (but don't use it much).
> > Ever since 8.1 came out, the amount of angst and problems seem to
> > have risen considerably on that list. For you
Tony Alfrey wrote:
> Hi
> I happen to be on the suse list also (but don't use it much).
> Ever since 8.1 came out, the amount of angst and problems seem to have
> risen considerably on that list. For you suse'ers, is this just new
> users or does it seem that 8.1 might have been a little "rushe
Killedid my bread and butter - AppGen - Major problems on the GUI side.
Other things (too many to recall) went kauput with my 8.1 Install.
Had to DOWNGRADE all the computers here back to 8.0
SuSe 8.1 definately has it's share of problems. But I am told, Madrake 9.0
and RedHack 8.0 have probl
On Friday 08 November 2002 17:11, Keith Antoine wrote:
> On Saturday 09 November 2002 04:20 am, Tony Alfrey espoused:
> > Hi
> > I happen to be on the suse list also (but don't use it much).
> > Ever since 8.1 came out, the amount of angst and problems seem to have
> > risen considerably on that li
On Saturday 09 November 2002 04:20 am, Tony Alfrey espoused:
> Hi
> I happen to be on the suse list also (but don't use it much).
> Ever since 8.1 came out, the amount of angst and problems seem to have
> risen considerably on that list. For you suse'ers, is this just new
> users or does it seem t
Hi
I happen to be on the suse list also (but don't use it much).
Ever since 8.1 came out, the amount of angst and problems seem to have
risen considerably on that list. For you suse'ers, is this just new
users or does it seem that 8.1 might have been a little "rushed"??
--
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL P
17 matches
Mail list logo
