On Sunday 09 December 2001 15:24, stayler enunciated:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 16:16:00 +1000, Keith Antoine wrote:
Well mate, start it from a konsole and see why it exits first!!
It was some plugins.
But still I am trying to build the SRPMs and no joy so far. xine-libs
keeps choking on the
Bruce Marshall wrote:
[...]
% To tape? Question is, what happens when you restore (perhaps from a
% backup system) and then boot the ext3 root. I suppose it all works fine.
Yes, it does. I've had no trouble booting with / on an ext3 FS.
Kurt
--
Alcohol is the anesthesia by which we
Chang wrote:
% But how should I enter the whois server list?
Try entering just the bare server name (for example,
whois.networksolutions.com) and see what happens.
[snippage]
Kurt
--
The default Magic Word, Abracadabra, actually is a corruption of the
Hebrew phrase ha-Bracha dab'ra which
Chang wrote:
% What is that site trying to do? I have never gone that IP.
% WOuld I lose a thing by turning off protocol 2 in /etc/protocols?
You might break IP multicasting.
Kurt
--
Why, every one as they like; as the good woman said when she kissed her cow.
-- Rabelais
trying...
Chang wrote:
% But how should I enter the whois server list?
Try entering just the bare server name (for example,
whois.networksolutions.com) and see what happens.
--
The pivotal point is the second chance, judged by another set of
criteria. In Linux We Trust -- http://linux.nf
I could think of one: web cast.
but.. not... multicast is usually used within a subnet only, not
crossing the subnet boundaries... I am really no TCP/IP expert.
Kurt Wall wrote:
Chang wrote:
% What is that site trying to do? I have never gone that IP.
% WOuld I lose a thing by turning off
Chang wrote:
% what services use multicasting? I believe watching realmedia movie or
% listenging to midi/mp3 online wouldn't use it, right? ftp, http, ssh,
% nntp, ... typical internet services would not use it.
I'm no expert, but I'm not aware of any of the standard services that
require
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 23:32:15 -0800 Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Odd, when I try this I have to close Galeon to reactivate Bluefish.
I'm in Libranet (debian with woody update). You just entered galeon
%s
as the command?
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 22:33:39 -0700
Collins Richey [EMAIL
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 07:42:59 -0700
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---snip---
Make sure you get 2.4.16+ (at least 2.4.17-pre1. 2.4.16 causes
filessystem corruption (all fs types).
Collins, is there a specific circumstance that fs corruption occurs? Like
only on systems with
Am Sonntag 09 Dezember 2001 15:41 schrieben Sie:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 23:32:15 -0800 Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Odd, when I try this I have to close Galeon to reactivate Bluefish.
I'm in Libranet (debian with woody update). You just entered galeon
%s
as the command?
On Sat,
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 10:14:39 -0500 Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 07:42:59 -0700
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---snip---
Make sure you get 2.4.16+ (at least 2.4.17-pre1. 2.4.16 causes
filessystem corruption (all fs types).
Collins, is
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:17:17 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Hermann-Josef Beckers) wrote:
Am Sonntag 09 Dezember 2001 15:41 schrieben Sie:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 23:32:15 -0800 Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Odd, when I try this I have to close Galeon to reactivate
Bluefish.
I'm in
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 08:24:32 -0700
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---snip---
it's
listed as
- Alexander Viro: fix unmount inode breakage, show_vfsmnt cleanup.
Thanks.
--
**
On Sunday 09 December 2001 9:42 am, Collins Richey wrote:
Make sure you get 2.4.16+ (at least 2.4.17-pre1. 2.4.16 causes
filessystem corruption (all fs types).
Interesting.. I've been running ext2 on 2.4.16 for a couple of weeks
now. No problems.
--
On Friday 07 December 2001 18:10, you wrote:
Thank you all for your replies. But can I ask again, are there any
issues
using
this (and the sis chipset) with Linux?
I have a severe and potentially unwarranted distaste for SiS anything. The
chipsets they develop are the cheepest and
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 21:48:14 +1000, Keith Antoine wrote:
Why the hell use srpms and have compile probs, when you can use the generic
rpms ??
Well,
The rpms are built on a SuSE box and all I get from them is a
segmentation fault. But it would seem that this is common as I get the
same fault
I know that 2.4.15 had this problem. I thought they fixed it with 2.4.16.
Jim
On Sunday, December 09, 2001 9:42, Collins Richey wrote:
snip
Make sure you get 2.4.16+ (at least 2.4.17-pre1. 2.4.16 causes
filessystem corruption (all fs types).
--
12:42pm up 20 days, 21:46, 2 users,
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 12:45:16 -0500 Jim Conner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I know that 2.4.15 had this problem. I thought they fixed it with
2.4.16.
Jim
On Sunday, December 09, 2001 9:42, Collins Richey wrote:
snip
Make sure you get 2.4.16+ (at least 2.4.17-pre1. 2.4.16 causes
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 10:59:20 -0700 Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 12:45:16 -0500 Jim Conner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I know that 2.4.15 had this problem. I thought they fixed it with
2.4.16.
Jim
On Sunday, December 09, 2001 9:42, Collins Richey
On Sunday, December 09, 2001 1:04, Collins Richey wrote:
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 10:59:20 -0700 Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 12:45:16 -0500 Jim Conner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I know that 2.4.15 had this problem. I thought they fixed it with
2.4.16.
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 15:55:31 -0500 Jim Conner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday, December 09, 2001 1:04, Collins Richey wrote:
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 10:59:20 -0700 Collins Richey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 12:45:16 -0500 Jim Conner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I
On Monday 10 December 2001 00:42, Collins Richey enunciated:
Make sure you get 2.4.16+ (at least 2.4.17-pre1. 2.4.16 causes
filessystem corruption (all fs types).
NOT as afar as I know 16 dosen't but 15 did. I an running 16 without problems
as are others here.
--
Keith Antoine aka
On Monday 10 December 2001 02:57, Bruce Marshall enunciated:
On Sunday 09 December 2001 9:42 am, Collins Richey wrote:
Make sure you get 2.4.16+ (at least 2.4.17-pre1. 2.4.16 causes
filessystem corruption (all fs types).
Interesting.. I've been running ext2 on 2.4.16 for a couple of
On Monday 10 December 2001 03:32, stayler enunciated:
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 21:48:14 +1000, Keith Antoine wrote:
Why the hell use srpms and have compile probs, when you can use the
generic rpms ??
Well,
The rpms are built on a SuSE box and all I get from them is a
segmentation fault. But
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:21:43 +1000, Keith Antoine wrote:
Shawn, me lad, mate!! First up what version are you trying to compile as the
very latest is a mess 0.9.6. They alterred the metronom. O.9.4 plays
just fine but get the rpms all of em, from skyblade as per previous posts.I
have
Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone has come accross the
message; "Warning time of day goes back" inside a ping request and what it
means?
Cheers
James McDonald
James McDonald wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone has come accross the message; Warning time
of day goes back inside a ping request and what it means?
IIRC, that means your machine or the responding one have their clocks
sent incorrectly and when your ping returns to you it has a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm getting these errors:
Dec 10 00:06:21 drakis kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady
SeekComplete Error }
Dec 10 00:06:21 drakis kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 {
UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=786516, sector=786452
Dec 10 00:06:21
Federico Voges wrote:
% -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
% Hash: SHA1
%
% Hi,
%
% I'm getting these errors:
%
% Dec 10 00:06:21 drakis kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady
% SeekComplete Error }
% Dec 10 00:06:21 drakis kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 {
% UncorrectableError },
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
That was my guess. I'll buy a new drive and use this on a test machine,
not the main server :)
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 22:34:59 -0500, Kurt Wall wrote:
Federico Voges wrote:
% -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
% Hash: SHA1
%
% Hi,
%
% I'm
--- Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Federico Voges wrote:
% -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
% Hash: SHA1
%
% Hi,
%
% I'm getting these errors:
%
% Dec 10 00:06:21 drakis kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 {
DriveReady
% SeekComplete Error }
% Dec 10 00:06:21 drakis kernel:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Yes, I'll do that as soon as I can. I prefer that it fails/dies in a
test PC than on my server.
BTW, is there any way I can check if it has bad sectors?? I know that
fsck can check for and mark the bad sectors. But how can I see the bad
sector
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yup, you were right. No more DMA errors, now I get I/O errors :)
Before hdparm -d 0 /dev/hda:
Dec 10 00:06:21 drakis kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady
SeekComplete Error }
Dec 10 00:06:21 drakis kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 {
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 23:25:24 -0500
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While watching S. King's IT on tv. tonight... with the wifey ofcourse... I
upgraded my laptop to use ext3.
Once installed, I did a couple of tests... namely... I removed the battery
and then unplugged the wall adpater
The Sis 735 used on the ECS K7S5a motherboard works great with Linux. I
have built ten machines with this board and all are running fine. The one I
built for myself run Mandrake 8.1 with no problems. There is no Sis video
on these boards so you should be safe. I also built one machine using a
ahh thanks Ian it has been driving me crazy I will do a hwclock on it and
tell it to go away
Thanks greatly
James
- Original Message -
From: Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: Ping has a strange message on it...
36 matches
Mail list logo
