I thought it was a bit sluggish too. But not as sluggish as Mandrake
8.1 Was running on AMD K6 2-500 with 256MB ram on its own HD.
Ray
On 8 Jan 2002, at 19:19, Ken Moffat wrote:
Date sent: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 19:19:11 -0800
> Anyone trying ELX think it's a bit sluggish?
> (maybe it
Thanks. That did the trick. @HOME was expecting a hostname.
I am a bit puzzled by the startup scripts. I don't know what to put into
the ifcfg-eth1 script for the dynamic parameter. So, in my usual style,
I just ripped out all the fancy garbage (That is, stuff I can't
understand) in the network st
--- Mike Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:29, Robert L. Hemus wrote:
> > Tn the step by steps to install a CDROM RW in step 2 it says you add
> > "hd?=ide-scsi to the kernel line in your menu.lst file."
>
> the ? means use the letter b,c or d. Ie whichever is your cd
--- "R. Quenett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> from Robert L. Hemus:
>
> " Tn the step by steps to install a CDROM RW in step 2 it says you add
> " "hd?=ide-scsi to the kernel line in your menu.lst file."
>
Showing us what your menu.lst file looks like might help.
> " then reboot.
> " When
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 20:24:45 -0500
Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forwarded for Rick... (it's users@ not steps@)
>
Doug
Thanks, made proper correction here,
cheers
--
Rick Sivernell
Dallas, Texas 75287
972 306-2296
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caldera Open Linux eWorkStation 3.1
Reg
Mike Andrew wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:29, Robert L. Hemus wrote:
> > Tn the step by steps to install a CDROM RW in step 2 it says you add
> > "hd?=ide-scsi to the kernel line in your menu.lst file."
>
> the ? means, got that, OK...OL e2.4, of course..
>
> PS:
> IF you are running
Anyone trying ELX think it's a bit sluggish?
(maybe it's because I have it about 40 gigs in to a 60 gig drive?)
--
Ken Moffat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Hemo wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:29:03 -0800, you wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:59:40PM -0800, Robert L. Hemus wrote:
> >> Tn the step by steps to install a CDROM RW in step 2 it says you add
> >> "hd?=ide-scsi to the kernel line in your menu.lst file."
> >> then reboot.
> >> W
On January 8, 2002 05:24 pm, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> Quick question here. I am using pop3 for my normal mail devilery.
> I have a new email address from the University of North Texas. They
> are using IMAP. Sylpheed has a setting for IMAP4.
>
> 1 is IMAP4 same as imap
AFAIK IMAP4 is IMAP ver
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 20:57:53 -0500 Joel Hammer wrote:
> The more I learn about vi the better it becomes.
>
> Just to pass along a couple of tricks I recently learned about vi (vim)
> which have made a huge difference in my use of it.
>
> A big problem with vi is fixing up those ragged lines afte
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:02:43 +1000 "Shane Broomhall" wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> --=_NextPart_000_000F_01C197BE.A6961A80
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>
> Hi all ,
>
> I am planning on moving from
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:29, Robert L. Hemus wrote:
> Tn the step by steps to install a CDROM RW in step 2 it says you add
> "hd?=ide-scsi to the kernel line in your menu.lst file."
the ? means use the letter b,c or d. Ie whichever is your cd ide drive.
PS:
IF you are running a 2.4 kernel the
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:29:03 -0800, you wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:59:40PM -0800, Robert L. Hemus wrote:
>> Tn the step by steps to install a CDROM RW in step 2 it says you add
>> "hd?=ide-scsi to the kernel line in your menu.lst file."
>> then reboot.
>> When I do this it won't reboot
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:20, Declan Moriarty wrote:
> > > > using COM3 for about 9 months.
> > >
> > > I won't. I imagine that it can also be configured as com 1 or com 2;
> >
> > Trust me, i tried every bit of setserial magic that i could find. It
[snip]
The point behind the original post(er) wa
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 09:51, R. Quenett wrote:
> Suggestions to correct the following fstab entry so any
> user can write to /mnt/hda14 would be appreciated.
>
> /dev/hda14 /mnt/hda14 vfat rw,users,dev,exec,suid,check=n,uid=503,gid=100 0
[snip]
vfat defaults, users, umask=0 0 0
--
http://li
Thanks to the people who responded for their ideas. Where I think we will
go with this is indeed using tools for virtual domains. In particular, if
we can be sure doing so will leave mail to valid addresses untouched,
making an entry to virtusertable sounds like the approach that will have
l
On Jan 8 Stuart Biggerstaff was heard saying:
->Is there a straightforward way to have e-mail sent to nonexistent addresses
->forwarded to root or another account? We would like to be able to collect
->these to possibly forward to the users.
*** Yes there is: Use the /etc/mail/virtusertable a
from Robert L. Hemus:
" Tn the step by steps to install a CDROM RW in step 2 it says you add
" "hd?=ide-scsi to the kernel line in your menu.lst file."
Is your kernel compiled with ide-scsi support? If yes try
'hdx=scsi'. The kernel configuration help for the relevant item
mentions that
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:59:40PM -0800, Robert L. Hemus wrote:
> Tn the step by steps to install a CDROM RW in step 2 it says you add
> "hd?=ide-scsi to the kernel line in your menu.lst file."
> then reboot.
> When I do this it won't reboot. Need to use the rescue disk. Is the
> file I nee
Forwarded for Rick... (it's users@ not steps@)
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: IMAP4
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:27:07 -0600
From: Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Linux StepByStep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List
Quick question here. I am using pop3 for my normal mail devilery
Thanks to Dave Anselmi and Ronnie Gauthier for your 'right on'
replies. I also figured it out shortly after I hit send. How
many times does that happen? Anyway,
/dev/hda14 /mnt/hda14 vfat defaults,umask=002,gid=100 0 0
works fine. I musta read man umount three gadzillion times without
not
Had a brush with Mandrake 8.1 and very quickly re-installed Suse 7.3 for now.
I have a problem I had before with Suse in that the print job I gave it seems
to be looping and just going on and on, its CUPs which mandrake does not
install by default. AFAIC it should use cups but does not and I ha
Tn the step by steps to install a CDROM RW in step 2 it says you add
"hd?=ide-scsi to the kernel line in your menu.lst file."
then reboot.
When I do this it won't reboot. Need to use the rescue disk. Is the
file I need to work on in /root/boot/grub/menu.lst? If so, what have I
done, am doin
"R. Quenett" wrote:
> Suggestions to correct the following fstab entry so any
> user can write to /mnt/hda14 would be appreciated.
>
> /dev/hda14 /mnt/hda14 vfat rw,users,dev,exec,suid,check=n,uid=503,gid=100 0 0
What are the permissions on /mnt/hda14 when it is mounted? You might have to
make
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 01:50, Kurt Wall wrote:
> Are you still wearing your KurtWerks (tm) Hat?
Sadly, no, one of Les Bell's goats took an unfortunate liking to it.
I have tried banana leaves instead, but have to say 'they' are still speaking
to me, while my friends are not.
--
http://linux.nf
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:14, Ted Ozolins wrote:
> The All in Wonder card is basically a Mach64 card, what driver did you use?
Wooo! I didn't know that. Skippy, that's an 'unusual' driver for Xfree did
you try that?
--
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:03, Collins Richey wrote:
> I've experimented
> with various partitionings, but I always come back to a single partition
> per distro or a separate /home partition as second choice Unless you plan
> to download tons of MP3/OGG files, movie clips, iso images, etc. ... I
> nev
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:34:42PM -0600, Stuart Biggerstaff wrote:
>Is there a straightforward way to have e-mail sent to nonexistent addresses
>forwarded to root or another account? We would like to be able to collect
>these to possibly forward to the users.
I don't do sendmail, but did see a
/dev/hda1 /mnt/win_c vfat user,exec,umask=0 0 0
works for me
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 22:21, R. Quenett wrote:
> Suggestions to correct the following fstab entry so any
> user can write to /mnt/hda14 would be appreciated.
>
> /dev/hda14 /mnt/hda14 vfat rw,users,dev,exec,suid,check=n,uid=503,gid
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 17:34 pm, Stuart Biggerstaff wrote:
> Is there a straightforward way to have e-mail sent to nonexistent addresses
> forwarded to root or another account? We would like to be able to collect
> these to possibly forward to the users.
>
> I know we could set up aliases for
Is there a straightforward way to have e-mail sent to nonexistent addresses
forwarded to root or another account? We would like to be able to collect
these to possibly forward to the users.
I know we could set up aliases for deleted former users and maybe for
incorrect spellings we could antic
Suggestions to correct the following fstab entry so any
user can write to /mnt/hda14 would be appreciated.
/dev/hda14 /mnt/hda14 vfat rw,users,dev,exec,suid,check=n,uid=503,gid=100 0 0
As it is, root can write and any user can read (always), but a user
can write only if logged in as uid 503. If
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 09:30:02AM -0800, Net Llama wrote:
>Still about $20 above its value.
No. Several hundred dollars above its value considering the
damage it can do.
Bill
--
INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 664
Look at this:
http://www.shockley.net/obsd-bootcd.asp
Roger
-Original Message-
From: Condon Thomas A KPWA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:25 PM
To: Linux Users (E-mail)
Subject: Searching for a distro...
I'm looking for a distro that will boot from either
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 04:18 pm, you wrote:
> >Is it possible to get Windows NT and 2000 to coexist on the same
> > hard drive? I've heard that NT won't reside with another OS.
>
> That is not true. I have sit up triple boot systems running NT
> workstation, win2k and Linux.
> You just have in
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 04:04 pm, you wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2002 02:58 pm, Randy wrote :
> > Is it possible to get Windows NT and 2000 to coexist on the same
> > hard drive? I've heard that NT won't reside with another OS.
> > TIA,
> > Randy Donohoe
>
> well, I have a cd of Windows NT4
I'm looking for a distro that will boot from either a floppy or CD,
recognize a SCSI raid system, allow me to mount the partitions thereof, r/w
to NTFS (NT4 version) and burn CDs on an IDE CDRW. I'd be quite happy with
a command line interface instead of GUI. The purpose is to copy some file
sy
>Is it possible to get Windows NT and 2000 to coexist on the same hard
>drive? I've heard that NT won't reside with another OS.
That is not true. I have sit up triple boot systems running NT workstation,
win2k and Linux.
You just have install windows first which make it easier down the road to
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 02:58 pm, Randy wrote :
> Is it possible to get Windows NT and 2000 to coexist on the same hard
> drive? I've heard that NT won't reside with another OS.
> TIA,
> Randy Donohoe
well, I have a cd of Windows NT4 and a CD of Windows 2000 Pro sitting right
here and they ar
Is it possible to get Windows NT and 2000 to coexist on the same hard
drive? I've heard that NT won't reside with another OS.
TIA,
Randy Donohoe
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Net Llama babbled on about:
> Perhaps i'm naive, but i always thought that if a patch applies cleanly,
> then it works. At least that has been my limited experience.
nope. you can have two different memory-tweaking patches that apply cleanly
to your tre, but effectively cancel each other out. t
Still about $20 above its value.
--- Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My son just got a copy of XP professional for $20 from his school.
> Student
> discount. That is the kind of price I am trying to get.
>
> Joel
>
>
> > Take a look at:
> >
> > www.bcd2000.com
> >
> > Th
My son just got a copy of XP professional for $20 from his school. Student
discount. That is the kind of price I am trying to get.
Joel
> Take a look at:
>
> www.bcd2000.com
>
> They have XP Home (full version) for 99 bux, but their XP Pro is priced at
> $159.
>
> FWIW
>
> Regar
Perhaps i'm naive, but i always thought that if a patch applies cleanly,
then it works. At least that has been my limited experience.
--- Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anyone besides me trying to keep up with the flurry of kernel
> patches on
> lkml concerning scheduling, mem
- Original Message -
From: "Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: Maxtor 80 meg drive
> I want to use this drive to boot several versions of linux. If I can
> get a cheap copy of XP, I will want to put that on there,
Is anyone besides me trying to keep up with the flurry of kernel patches on
lkml concerning scheduling, memory-mapping, pre-epmtion, etc.?
If so, does anyone have a good idea of what works, what works together, and
what don't?
I'm currently running 2.4.17 with the preempt patch from rml and grs
I took a security class from www.sans.org couple of months ago and found out
the thin layer of protection that people when they surf the net. It is very
scary and frighting on the differnt tools that are out there. Alot of those
tools are for script kiddies which is not rocket science to run. T
got try www.sans.org. They often list the most common security holes in
companies and weaknesses in desktops, poliocies, and a whole bunch of stuff.
I took a security class with company (online courses that is) and this is a
top notch site with excellent classes if you are serious. there prices
Joel Hammer wrote:
>
> Still trying to get connected with dhcpcd -d eth1 to the new or old
> @HOME service. My cable modem is on eth1.
>
> This command, dhcpcd -d eth0, talking to my intranet dhcpd linux server,
> gets assigned an IP address without trouble.
>
> Here is what I see with tcpdump
I kind of solved the problem.
I am using pppoe to connect to my BB provider
over eth1 with an IP address 192.168.3.1.
when sendmail starts, it binded itsefl to eth1 rather than the
pppoe interface. My named's MX on the other hands pointed at
my eth0 (the internal network card) that had an IP of
I got an insight into this recently from my son.
(Tip: If you really want to find out about the 'net - ask a teenager)
This guy has to deal with 'lamers' who try to use the myriad of tools for
hacking under Dos/Win. For the unwary, they're impressive. To the networking
type, they're eas
Was it Net Llama who wrote on Monday 07 January 2002 15:58:
>
> > > Please don't tell that to the real modem in my box that has been
> >
> > happily
> >
> > > using COM3 for about 9 months.
> >
> > I won't. I imagine that it can also be configured as com 1 or com 2;
>
> Trust me, i tried every bit
52 matches
Mail list logo
