SuSe vs. Mandrake decision

2001-07-07 Thread Mel Roman
Hello: I'm using a Caldera OpenLinux 2.3 system now. I never bothered to upgrade to 2.4 (deciding instead to wait for the next generation Caldera distribution which would have the latest kernel, KDE desktop, etc...). I've heard mixed reviews about the new 3.1 product and am finding my present

Re: SuSe vs. Mandrake decision

2001-07-07 Thread Collins Richey
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001 07:52:00 -0700 (PDT) Mel Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello: > > I'm using a Caldera OpenLinux 2.3 system now. I never > bothered to upgrade to 2.4 (deciding instead to > wait for the next generation Caldera distribution > which would have the latest kernel, KDE deskto

Re: SuSe vs. Mandrake decision

2001-07-07 Thread Lee
I haven't done anything with Mandrake 8.0 0r SuSe 7.2, but I have set up Mandrake 7.0 an SuSe 7.1. The Mandrake installs easier. Partitioning was a little strange after Caldera but easy to do. It found all of my hardware except the printer. Checked printtool after an found that Mandrake support

Re: SuSe vs. Mandrake decision

2001-07-07 Thread Geof Steichen
I have installed Mandrake 8.0 on a couple of machines. The good news is it installs very easily, even on pretty new hardware. I like the compatibility with RH RPMs so most software is available for it. I have had good luck getting CDRW to work and some difficulity getting DVD to work but tha

re: Suse vs Mandrake decision

2001-07-07 Thread Mel Roman
Thanks to the folks who offered their opinions of Mandrake vs. Suse. A couple of questions for those who have tried Mandrake 8.0: 1. Does the "standard" Mandrake 8.0 include all the usual stuff (Sever tools such as Samba, MySQL, etc.. and development tools, etc...), or are these available only

Re: SuSe vs. Mandrake decision

2001-07-08 Thread Mike Andrew
On Sunday 08 July 2001 10:45, Geof Steichen wrote: > The ugly fonts problem is there in spades in KDE, Konqurer, other stuff and > I have not yet found a good solution even following all the HOW-TO and > other hints. Does this include the fonts->deuglification on the Step by Step site? My fonts

Re: SuSe vs. Mandrake decision

2001-07-08 Thread Mike Andrew
On Sunday 08 July 2001 02:22, Mel Roman wrote: > and the two new ones that have caught my eye are > Suse 7.2 and Mandrake 8.0. I've seen some positive > first impressions of Suse posted on mail lists, but am [snip] There's a question mark currently hanging over the viability / durability of M

Re: Suse vs Mandrake decision

2001-07-08 Thread Mike Andrew
On Sunday 08 July 2001 15:15, Mel Roman wrote: > 3. Have others experienced the same "ugly font" > problem and problems loading Star Office that Geoff > has cited? see fonts-> on the SxS for rolling your own SO fonts. Peck Dickens did a great job of fixing that one. -- http://linux.nf --

Re: Suse vs Mandrake decision

2001-07-08 Thread Geof Steichen
It appears that MySQL and Samba client, and what looks like server, are on the 2 Disk Download version of MD8.0 and I am not sure if the development tools you are looking for are there or not but it looks like some are on the disks. I am not sure about the pluggins. I only had difficulty load

Re: Suse vs Mandrake decision

2001-07-10 Thread Matt . Carpenter
Even if you don't choose SuSE, MAKE SURE YOU TRY IT! It is a different feel, but it's nice! That and the fact that the 7 CD's for Professional have a huge amount of CATALOGUED software... What do I mean by this? Do you remember the "Specify Selection" option W3.1 and LTP gave you when install

Re: Suse vs Mandrake decision

2001-07-10 Thread rplummer
Comment on Mandrake 8.0 I downloaded the ISO for both the install and the extended stuff. The install went great, but then I have a pretty plain vanilla machine to install it on. However, I was disappointed in the KDE that was installed. I didn't see the familiar KDE panel, menu and etc. Whil

Re: Suse vs Mandrake decision

2001-07-12 Thread dep
On Tuesday 10 July 2001 02:01 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Even if you don't choose SuSE, MAKE SURE YOU TRY IT! It is a | different feel, but it's nice! That and the fact that the 7 CD's | for Professional have a huge amount of CATALOGUED software... What | do I mean by this? Do you remember

Re: Suse vs Mandrake decision

2001-07-12 Thread dep
On Tuesday 10 July 2001 03:36 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | The one other annoying thing was that it configured my video so | that the visable screen on my 17" monitor was located in the lower | right quadrant of the monitor. It had about an inch on the top and | left side of black space. Again,

Re: Suse vs Mandrake decision

2001-07-12 Thread Mike Andrew
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:32, dep wrote: [snipetty hack] > so. how is everyone this morning? A lot better from reading the above, thanks. I suspect that the greatest majority of us here on this mailer, actually 'know' a great deal more about Linux : - under the covers, than we think we do. Sinc

Re: SuSe vs. Mandrake decision-ugly fonts

2001-07-08 Thread Geof Steichen
I explored the SxS entries on FONTS and I think I have solved my ugly fonts problems. Mdk 8.0 uses xfs and I copied the Win98 fonts into a dir and updated the xfs config file (added the path to the new fonts), restarted X and now my fonts are much better. Thanks for the Info.