another rpm ooops

2001-12-21 Thread Keith Antoine
On Thursday 20 December 2001 15:43, Tony Alfrey enunciated: I got this the other day and didn't know exactly what you meant. Add the path to the library that rpm doesn't know about?? yes, exactly. The library is in /lib along with 10 gazillion libraries. if it is then add /lib

Re: another rpm ooops

2001-12-21 Thread Peter Ruskin
On Friday 21 Dec 2001 21:02, Keith Antoine wrote: On Thursday 20 December 2001 15:43, Tony Alfrey enunciated: I got this the other day and didn't know exactly what you meant. Add the path to the library that rpm doesn't know about?? yes, exactly. The library is in /lib along

Re: another rpm ooops

2001-12-20 Thread kwall
Tony Alfrey wrote: % On Thursday 20 December 2001 01:32 am,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: % snip % % Refresh my memory, what was the problem you were trying to solve? If % memory serves, you were trying to install an RPM that uses a newer % version of RPM than that supported by the version of RPM

Re: another RPM ooops

2001-12-20 Thread kwall
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:21:09AM -0800 Tony Alfrey wrote: % On Thursday 20 December 2001 07:54 am,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: % Tony Alfrey wrote: % snip % % (how do you know so much about this stuff??) % % I make my living knowing this

Re: another rpm ooops

2001-12-20 Thread kwall
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:21:09AM -0800 Tony Alfrey wrote: % On Thursday 20 December 2001 07:54 am,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: % Tony Alfrey wrote: % snip

Re: another rpm ooops

2001-12-19 Thread Keith Antoine
On Wednesday 19 December 2001 00:10, Tony Alfrey enunciated: On Monday 17 December 2001 09:24 pm,Keith Antoine wrote: snip Many newer rpms will not work with that version 3.6 is the least theey work with. Thanks. The LlamaDude sent me out to get a 3.0.6 from the SxS. I looked at

Re: another rpm ooops

2001-12-19 Thread Tony Alfrey
On Wednesday 19 December 2001 06:21 pm,Keith Antoine wrote: snip On Monday 17 December 2001 09:24 pm,Keith Antoine wrote: snip Many newer rpms will not work with that version 3.6 is the least theey work with. snip As I said the other day add the paths to /etc/ld.so.conf and then

Re: another rpm ooops

2001-12-18 Thread Tony Alfrey
On Monday 17 December 2001 09:24 pm,Keith Antoine wrote: snip Many newer rpms will not work with that version 3.6 is the least theey work with. Thanks. The LlamaDude sent me out to get a 3.0.6 from the SxS. I looked at rpm.org and it looks the numbering is 3.0.blahblah until it kicks in

Re: another rpm ooops

2001-12-18 Thread Ian
Tony Alfrey wrote: On Monday 17 December 2001 09:24 pm,Keith Antoine wrote: snip Many newer rpms will not work with that version 3.6 is the least theey work with. Thanks. The LlamaDude sent me out to get a 3.0.6 from the SxS. I looked at rpm.org and it looks the numbering is

Re: another rpm ooops

2001-12-18 Thread Tony Alfrey
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 06:33 am,Ian wrote: Tony Alfrey wrote: On Monday 17 December 2001 09:24 pm,Keith Antoine wrote: snip Many newer rpms will not work with that version 3.6 is the least theey work with. Thanks. The LlamaDude sent me out to get a 3.0.6 from the SxS. I

Re: another rpm ooops

2001-12-18 Thread Keith Antoine
On Wednesday 19 December 2001 01:07, Tony Alfrey enunciated: I thought Skippy went through this not long ago, can you not d/l a pre compiled binary version to run? Or am I inventing memories? I think you are absolutely correct; I remember the long thread and I'm loathe to go dig it up.

another rpm ooops

2001-12-17 Thread Tony Alfrey
Hi gang! An rpm newbie question: can somebody tell me what this message means when I try to use rpm (version 3.0.3.0) on a package: [root@noname /root]# rpm -i --test quasar-1.0-18.i386.rpm only packages with major numbers = 3 are supported by this version of RPM error: quasar-1.0-18.i386.rpm

Re: another rpm ooops

2001-12-17 Thread Net Llama
--- Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi gang! An rpm newbie question: can somebody tell me what this message means when I try to use rpm (version 3.0.3.0) on a package: [root@noname /root]# rpm -i --test quasar-1.0-18.i386.rpm only packages with major numbers = 3 are supported by

Re: another rpm ooops

2001-12-17 Thread Keith Antoine
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 14:00, Tony Alfrey enunciated: Hi gang! An rpm newbie question: can somebody tell me what this message means when I try to use rpm (version 3.0.3.0) on a package: [root@noname /root]# rpm -i --test quasar-1.0-18.i386.rpm only packages with major numbers = 3 are

Re: another rpm ooops

2001-12-17 Thread Tony Alfrey
On Monday 17 December 2001 09:10 pm,Net Llama wrote: --- Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi gang! An rpm newbie question: can somebody tell me what this message means when I try to use rpm (version 3.0.3.0) on a package: [root@noname /root]# rpm -i --test quasar-1.0-18.i386.rpm