Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-02-06 Thread Bill Day
no, unfortunately I have not had time to getback to all this. quick checks of messages and a couple of post and usually time to either head back out the door for something else or time to goto bed for work. Im alos clearing land int he country to get sarted on building our first house. I

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-02-05 Thread Keith Morse
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Bill Day wrote: Thanks Keith But Im still lost    8^( Going on with the trial and error... On Wednesday 30 January 2002 18:45, you were heard blurting out: Bill, just another quick reference I got turned on to by a friend is:

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-30 Thread David A. Bandel
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:12:55 -0500 begin Bill Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: hey david, something else... attached is my named.conf I have yet to get a dns book, so I am truly lost in its 'operations'. Where in this file would I locate the reverse information? It's not, it's

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-30 Thread Bill Day
ok, I was assuming that I had to create 2 more files under /var/named/pz and then put int the reverse information. but I just put them in the current zone files.. could you point/post me an example with the proper setup..? I realize I am getting annoying 8^) but until my book arrives Im

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-30 Thread David A. Bandel
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:08:58 -0500 begin Bill Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: [snip] --- $TTL 1D @ 1D IN SOA localhost. root.localhost 42 ; serial (d. adams)

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-30 Thread Keith Morse
Bill, just another quick reference I got turned on to by a friend is: http://www.cymru.com/~robt/Docs/Articles/secure-bind-template.html Helped alot for my first setup of Bind 9.x ___ Linux-users mailing list -

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-30 Thread Bill Day
Thanks Keith But Im still lost    8^( Going on with the trial and error... On Wednesday 30 January 2002 18:45, you were heard blurting out: Bill, just another quick reference I got turned on to by a friend is: http://www.cymru.com/~robt/Docs/Articles/secure-bind-template.html Helped alot

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-29 Thread Bill Day
On Saturday 26 January 2002 07:48, you were heard blurting out: Greek PTR RR... I appreciate your help David, but what will the reverse zone file contain differently that the forwards...? TIA, Based on the above, I'd say your /etc/named.conf has entries for reverse, but you haven't

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-29 Thread David A. Bandel
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:06:17 -0500 begin Bill Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: On Saturday 26 January 2002 07:48, you were heard blurting out: Greek PTR RR... I appreciate your help David, but what will the reverse zone file contain differently that the forwards...? instead of:

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-29 Thread Bill Day
OK, I will prolly get to it tomorrow. Thanks for all your help. On Tuesday 29 January 2002 19:00, you were heard blurting out: On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:06:17 -0500 begin Bill Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth: On Saturday 26 January 2002 07:48, you were heard blurting out: Greek PTR

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-29 Thread Bill Day
hey david, something else... attached is my named.conf I have yet to get a dns book, so I am truly lost in its 'operations'. Where in this file would I locate the reverse information? TIA -- Bill Day ( a.k.a. BadMan )188133 http://counter.li.org #linux-users

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-26 Thread Bill Day
GREAT BIGGIE snippage [root@linuxbox /root]# dig -x 127.0.0.1 SOA ; DiG 9.2.0 -x 127.0.0.1 SOA ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 35519 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION:

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-26 Thread David A. Bandel
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 05:33:31 -0500 Bill Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the bitstream: GREAT BIGGIE snippage [root@linuxbox /root]# dig -x 127.0.0.1 SOA ; DiG 9.2.0 -x 127.0.0.1 SOA ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 35519

hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-25 Thread Douglas J Hunley
Bill Day babbled on about: The secret for the example and then having secret in the named.conf, rndc.conf and rndc.key I replaced all the 'secrets with the pass and then also replaced all the quoted spots next to it with my output from encode, as soon as I returned it to secret and left the

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-25 Thread David A. Bandel
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:42:20 -0500 Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the bitstream: Bill Day babbled on about: The secret for the example and then having secret in the named.conf, rndc.conf and rndc.key I replaced all the 'secrets with the pass and then also replaced all the

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-25 Thread Bill Day
; DiG 9.2.0 daysdomain.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 53641 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;daysdomain.com.IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION:

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-25 Thread David A. Bandel
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:54:19 -0500 Bill Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the bitstream: ; DiG 9.2.0 daysdomain.com not quite. I need your SOA: dig daysdomain.com SOA Note, this should be for whatever zone BIND is barfing on. If it's a reverse, use a valid IP: dig -x 127.0.0.1 SOA My SOA

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-25 Thread Bill Day
Not really.. (Capiche..) but I'll give er hell... 8^) From fresh start I get this: Jan 25 20:46:14 linuxbox named[23782]: starting BIND 9.2.0 -u named Jan 25 20:46:14 linuxbox named[23782]: using 1 CPU Jan 25 20:46:14 linuxbox named[23782]: loading configuration from '/etc/named.conf' Jan 25

Re: hey Bandel! (was Re: BIND 9.x: Part II)

2002-01-25 Thread David A. Bandel
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 21:02:46 -0500 Bill Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the bitstream: Not really.. (Capiche..) but I'll give er hell... 8^) From fresh start I get this: Jan 25 20:46:14 linuxbox named[23782]: starting BIND 9.2.0 -u named Jan 25 20:46:14 linuxbox named[23782]: using 1