Am Thu, 30 Aug 2007 02:07:45 +0200
schrieb Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:27:59PM +0200, Markus Boas wrote:
I hope this one is better
Almost, please add the Signed-off-by to _all_ patches you send
(you forgot it on this patch), and please also include the README
So I hope I forget nothing
Greeding
Markus Boas
Signed-off-by: Markus Boas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: flash.h
===
--- flash.h (Revision 2751)
+++ flash.h (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -100,7 +100,9 @@
#define WINBOND_ID 0xDA /*
Am Mittwoch 29 August 2007 schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger:
On 29.08.2007 10:32, Markus Boas wrote:
Today I retry to add support for the Winbond W29C040P chip.
Please post a patch and perhaps a link to the data sheet. Then we can
look at it as well.
Am Donnerstag 30 August 2007 schrieb Markus Boas:
Am Mittwoch 29 August 2007 schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger:
On 29.08.2007 10:32, Markus Boas wrote:
Today I retry to add support for the Winbond W29C040P chip.
Please post a patch and perhaps a link to the data sheet. Then we can
look
So I send the Patch for the Winbond W29C040P
Index: README
===
--- README (Revision 2751)
+++ README (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@
SyncMOS S29C31004T
Winbond W29C011
Winbond W29C020C
+Winbond W29C040P
Winbond
Author: uwe
Date: 2007-08-30 12:11:08 +0200 (Thu, 30 Aug 2007)
New Revision: 2752
Modified:
trunk/util/flashrom/README
trunk/util/flashrom/flash.h
trunk/util/flashrom/flashchips.c
Log:
Add support for the Winbond W29C040P.
Signed-off-by: Markus Boas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Uwe
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:50:06AM +0200, Markus Boas wrote:
Index: README
===
--- README (Revision 2751)
+++ README (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@
SyncMOS S29C31004T
Winbond W29C011
Winbond W29C020C
+Winbond
Author: uwe
Date: 2007-08-30 12:17:50 +0200 (Thu, 30 Aug 2007)
New Revision: 2753
Added:
trunk/util/flashrom/w29ee011.c
Modified:
trunk/util/flashrom/Makefile
trunk/util/flashrom/README
trunk/util/flashrom/flash.h
trunk/util/flashrom/flashchips.c
Log:
Add support for the Winbond
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:10:31AM +0200, Markus Boas wrote:
Signed-off-by: Markus Boas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, committed in r2753 (with minor changes).
Uwe.
--
http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de
http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 02:19:08AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
+ * This file is part of the LinuxBIOS project.
^
Make this flashrom please
I disagree. In my opinion flashrom is a part of the LinuxBIOS project.
Hm, depends on
Author: uwe
Date: 2007-08-30 12:25:43 +0200 (Thu, 30 Aug 2007)
New Revision: 486
Modified:
LinuxBIOSv3/arch/x86/pci_ops_mmconf.c
Log:
This switches the only remaining non-userspace code from uint*_t to u*.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann [EMAIL
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 02:16:21AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
This switches the only remaining non-userspace code from uint*_t to u*.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, r486.
Uwe.
--
http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de
Author: uwe
Date: 2007-08-30 12:29:15 +0200 (Thu, 30 Aug 2007)
New Revision: 2754
Modified:
trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/cpu/amd/model_fxx/model_fxx_init.c
Log:
Add support for the Athlon64 x2 5000+ CPU.
A trivial one-liner for the CPU I happen to have. The sales docs said it's
a G1 revision, but
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 10:33:03PM +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote:
diff -Burb --exclude=.svn
CVS/LinuxBIOSv2/src/cpu/amd/model_fxx/model_fxx_init.c
tmp/LinuxBIOSv2/src/cpu/amd/model_fxx/model_fxx_init.c
--- CVS/LinuxBIOSv2/src/cpu/amd/model_fxx/model_fxx_init.c2007-07-25
18:25:58.0
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 01:33:41PM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
On 8/29/07, Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CC build/device/pnp_raw.o
CC build/stage0.init
/tmp/v3/build/arch/x86/stage1.o: In function `stage1_main':
stage1.c:(.text+0x1fb): undefined reference to
Dear LinuxBIOS readers!
This is the automated build check service of LinuxBIOS.
The developer uwe checked in revision 2752 to
the LinuxBIOS source repository and caused the following
changes:
Change Log:
Add support for the Winbond W29C040P.
Signed-off-by: Markus Boas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 30.08.2007 06:19, ron minnich wrote:
On 8/29/07, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say it should accept a lar archive via serial console, perhaps using
ymodem, and start executing the first member of the lar.
A bit more detailed: If the BIOS fails to verify its checksum,
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:39:25AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
But my main motivation is that if there was a MB with a Works with
linuxbios sticker on it, and it didn't cost too much I'd buy it.
I'll say M57SLI.
Just for the record; if you buy an M57SLI now, it's a new revision with SPI
rom
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 11:32:31PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 05:16:31PM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
I suppose linuxbios could be used for tivoization of the payload,
perhaps easier than a normal bios, but in that case couldn't
linuxbios just be rebuilt to not include
Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:28:23AM +0200, Rasmus Wiman wrote:
when I can afford it, I will buy a new MB with integrated vga,
probably the one I think stands the best chance of getting
supported. Right now I think that would mean NVidia or VIA, but
I
#88: Add UHCI/OHCI/EHCI support to GRUB2
-+--
Reporter: uwe| Owner: somebody
Type: enhancement| Status: new
Priority: major
Quoting Rasmus Wiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:28:23AM +0200, Rasmus Wiman wrote:
when I can afford it, I will buy a new MB with integrated vga,
probably the one I think stands the best chance of getting
supported. Right now I
Rasmus Wiman wrote:
Ward Vandewege [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for the record; if you buy an M57SLI now, it's a new revision
with SPI rom chip. The second position is still unpopulated, but the
paths are now also SPI, no longer PLCC.
I have one of these at home :/
I read about that,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:33:18AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Todo
abuild -- needs discussion; will it work for v3 eventually?
No, I think we want to migrate this to use Jordan's buildrom instead and
thus lower the complexity and number of tools that can be used to build
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:43:19AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 02:14:24PM +0200, Steffen D. wrote:
Im trying to build a linuxbios for my AMD Geode LX db800 board.
..
I have a very big ROM 4Mbit. The resulting image is 512kb
Note that 4Mbit and 512kbyte is exactly
Dear LinuxBIOS readers!
This is the automated build check service of LinuxBIOS.
The developer uwe checked in revision 2753 to
the LinuxBIOS source repository and caused the following
changes:
Change Log:
Add support for the Winbond W29EE011.
Signed-off-by: Markus Boas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:25:27PM +0200, Rasmus Wiman wrote:
Ward Vandewege [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for the record; if you buy an M57SLI now, it's a new revision
with SPI rom chip. The second position is still unpopulated, but the
paths are now also SPI, no longer PLCC.
I have
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:35:47PM +0100, Chris Lingard wrote:
Same problem here, my M57SLI has been at the computer shop for over one
week awaiting the modification.
They say the socket that I got is wrong, (PLCC32).
Will the SST 49LF040 be wrong too.
Most likely if your
Ward Vandewege [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Different sockets, yes. I've updated the M57SLI howto with a picture
of an SPI version; I'll make a picture of a PLCC version too at work
today.
Just had a look and I think I could work out where the BIOS is, but how
about loading the picture in gimp
Dear LinuxBIOS readers!
This is the automated build check service of LinuxBIOS.
The developer uwe checked in revision 2754 to
the LinuxBIOS source repository and caused the following
changes:
Change Log:
Add support for the Athlon64 x2 5000+ CPU.
A trivial one-liner for the CPU I happen to
Ward Vandewege wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:35:47PM +0100, Chris Lingard wrote:
Same problem here, my M57SLI has been at the computer shop for over one
week awaiting the modification.
They say the socket that I got is wrong, (PLCC32).
Will the SST 49LF040 be wrong too.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:06:08AM -0400, Ward Vandewege wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:25:27PM +0200, Rasmus Wiman wrote:
Ward Vandewege [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for the record; if you buy an M57SLI now, it's a new revision
with SPI rom chip. The second position is still
Rasmus Wiman schrieb:
I read about that, yes. What does it mean? Different sockets? No
sockets at all? Impossible to flash?
there are SPI sockets out there in industry, but less common probably
pricey. plcc32 is much more commonplace.
but then soldering 8 contacts might seem less risky to
Joseph Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
Didn't even know LB has that kind of support for any graphics chip.
I only knew about the CONFIG_PCI_ROM_RUN and (if needed )
extracting the vga bios from the stock bios approach. By the way,
at least Rage XL (with its own memory) seems pretty common
Quux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there are SPI sockets out there in industry, but less common
probably pricey. plcc32 is much more commonplace.
but then soldering 8 contacts might seem less risky to do manually
compared with 32 contacts.
the 1.0 pcb layout has solder pads for plcc as
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:39:21PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
Thanks, that'll be helpful for a lot of people, I guess. Please attach
license to the photos, though.
Done.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Foundation - Senior System Administrator
--
linuxbios
Hey everyone,
I have stumbled upon posts by Carl-Daniel and Stefan while trying to get
some
information why when I compile a kernel image with 7zip (LZMA) the kernel
image doesn't load up.
The specific post is -
http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxbios@linuxbios.org/msg06389.html
I figured that
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/29/07, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct typo, fix stage2 code documentation, add dtsname printing to
differentiate between identically named objects during boot.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If this is not acked yet
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I hope somebody has a way to test, I do not, but this looks to useful to lose.
On 8/22/07, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This adds probing for almost all recent (since 1999) ITE Super I/O chips
to
On Monday 27 August 2007 00:31:37 Quux wrote:
Peter Stuge schrieb:
It may not be best practice to hotplug, but it is rather safe since
the chip is never accessed once the system is running.
saves plug cycles and time ...
Even an 8 Mbit piece 49LF080A works with the Asus a8ne, so
maybe
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:14:53AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
If this is not acked yet
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't worry, a later version of this patch is already committed, so this
one is no longer needed.
Uwe.
--
http://www.hermann-uwe.de |
On 30.08.2007 13:37, Uwe Hermann wrote:
So here's the updated plan:
- Move probe_superio to util/superio-detect (rename it while we're at it).
It does much more than detection these days. It also has the ability to
verify and dump SuperI/O configuration. Can we think about the name a
little
- Original Message -
From: Rasmus Wiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 16:17
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] M57 SLI SPI pads
Quux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there are SPI sockets out there in industry, but less common
probably pricey. plcc32
- Original Message -
From: Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Darmawan Salihun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linuxbios linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 00:07
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] [RFC] Call for Action: LinuxBIOS foundations
Darmawan Salihun wrote:
On 8/29/07, *Uwe
hello,
for some time now i have a bootloader in my howbrew rom emulator that can
read / write to memory in on a byte basis and on a block basis using iHex
for the block ones
i have adapted it it to run on the pc in porting LB to right now. it can
erase flash sectors or the whole chip.
im
Uwe Hermann wrote:
Hi,
here's an initial patch for the MSI MS-6178 mainboard.
Looks like a good start (see comments below)
Acked-by: Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It boots up to a login prompt, but there are a number of issues
which need to be fixed before we can call this fully
46 matches
Mail list logo
