Hello LinuxPTP community,
We (B&R) are currently evaluating the available open-source PTP implementations
(LinxPTP, PTPd, OpenAVB) for the usage as IEEE 802.1AS stacks.
As part of this effort, I have spent some time to test LinuxPTP on a B&R
industrial PC with an Intel i210 NIC.
LinuxPTP alread
Wolfgang,
In general I am not aware of any issues regarding AS compatibility.
We tried very had to follow the standard as closely as possible.
Delio (on CC) might have more to say about this. He maintains his own
AS branch on github.
https://github.com/audioscience/linuxptp
I just briefly co
Hello Richard,
> > Do I need any further permissions for my sourceforge account to view the
> > archives?
>
> I just fiddled with the SF settings for the lists. Can you see it now?
>
> (I have been recommending gmane instead, but that site went down.)
I still get the same error (Error 403, R
Hi Delio,
> >> 2) Differences in the BMC algorithm
> >>
> >> Is it possible to specify a different best master clock algorithm than
> >> that of the default PTP profile?
> >
> > No, not yet. I have some patches in the works for allowing different
> > BMC variants, because some profiles will re
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:07:01PM +0100, Delio Brignoli wrote:
> > @Delio, I see you allow announce without the TLV:
> >
> >
> > https://github.com/audioscience/linuxptp/commit/0b6d8ca73332391af9bddc25177df254b066d669
> >
> > Can you tell us why?
>
> This is tricky because in some places 802
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 03:49:39PM +0100, Wolfgang Wallner wrote:
> This leads to another point that I have not figured out yet.
> If I would like to get notified in another program about PTP state changes,
> what is the preferred interface?
We use the management interface from 1588. Remote prog
Hi Richard, Wolfgang,
> On 31 Oct 2016, at 12:17, Richard Cochran wrote:
>
> https://github.com/audioscience/linuxptp
>
> I just briefly compared v1.4 with his asi1230-master, and nothing
> earth shaking stood out.
Yes, but there is number of things I’d like to contribute upstream and didn’t
> On 31 Oct 2016, at 16:06, Richard Cochran wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:07:01PM +0100, Delio Brignoli wrote:
>>> @Delio, I see you allow announce without the TLV:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/audioscience/linuxptp/commit/0b6d8ca73332391af9bddc25177df254b066d669
>>>
>>> Can you te
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 05:29:30PM +0100, Delio Brignoli wrote:
>
> Yes, but I stated as much in my previous message: the switch was not
> compliant. However, linuxptp isn’t compliant either on the RX side
> which is the reason for my patch.
The whole reason for the Path Trace is to avoid loops.
On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 08:58 +0100, Wolfgang Wallner wrote:
> 5) The PPS signal produced by the i210 seems to be unreliable
>
> I know that the right place to discuss i210 problems would be LMKL, I
> just mention this here as I assume several of you might have
> experience with this chip.
> I obser
10 matches
Mail list logo
