> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
>
--
Aleksandar Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
org.mandas.docker-client exception.
The tag v8.9.0 maps to commit b85976e5e6d0791babac6f28957669acb9d8025e and
corresponds to build 5 of the stable-8.9 Jenkins job.
--
Aleksandar Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev
! Less
things to do manually is always nice.
--
Aleksandar Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:45 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Eclipse Foundation is willing to shutdown Gerrit.
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=577152
> It seems that now is a right time to consider migrating LSP4E to GitHub.
>
> The plan would
to display to users and refer to links in it once we switch to github.
--
Aleksandar Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev
would receive a notification that LSP4E
is adopting GitHub issues and reporters should re-report their issues there
if still relevant.
That's how we did thing for m2e and Tycho in the last years, and we've seen
a good impact on projects overall.
What do you think?
--
Aleksandar Kurtak
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 9:11 PM Patrick Tasse
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the Linux Tools 7.5.1 release the project has moved from org.swtchart
> 0.10.0 to org.eclipse.swtchart 0.7.0 [1].
>
> In our project we depend on the org.eclipse.linuxtools.dataviewers
> feature. More specifically we use PieChart a
All old milestone and rc update sites are removed now from our downloads.
--
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 9:35 PM Jeff Johnston wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:22 PM akurtakov wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 9:09 PM Roland Grunberg
>> wrote:
>>
>>> A long while ago, I filed CQs for dockerfile-language-server-nodejs [1]
>>> and Dockerfile.tmLanguage [2] in order
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Jonah Graham
wrote:
> I have had a quick look, and both linuxtools-sonar and
> linuxtools-master jobs copy to the same location.
Sonar job copy files? How did you come to this ? I'm looking at the job
config and can't see any coping and it's mvn verify not inst
Forwarding Wayne's reply clarifying that no permission from copyright
owners is needed.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Wayne Beaton
Date: Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Switching to EPL-2.0
To: jjohn...@redhat.com
Cc: Aleksandar Kurtakov
Jeff,
Hi everyone,
What do you think of switching to EPL-2.0? It can be done easily
Please read https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php for details. If
you have any concerns raise them on the list. If no objections in next 2
weeks I'll consider this a silent approval and proceed with the change.
-
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 2:36 AM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Unless someone has a new feature they want to propose for Linux Tools'
> contribution to Oxygen.3, I propose that we make it a bug-fix-only point
> release.
>
> If everyone is ok with this, then bug-fixes will go into the existing
> stable-6.2
Our Hipp instance is now powered by Jenkins aka JIPP :). The preferred
URL for accessing it is https://ci.eclipse.org/linuxtools/ although a
redirect from the old one is there.
There are 3 jobs I plan to remove unless someone gives a good reason
not to - mars, neon and neon3respin.
All other jobs s
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> If anybody has a new feature that is intended for Oxygen.1, please
> speak up. Otherwise, I am going to propose a point release for
> Oxygen.1 (bug fixes only).
>
> I would also propose our next minor release 6.2.0 be for Oxygen.2 in December
- Original Message -
> From: "Alena Laskavaia"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Friday, 11 December, 2015 10:30:00 PM
> Subject: [linuxtools-dev] 5.0 milestone in bugzilla?
>
> Can somebody please create 5.0 milestone for bugzilla (or whatever version
> matches neon)?
>
Hello everyone,
Git master has the features bumped to 5.0.0 and there is new
linuxtools-e4.6.target that points to Neon content. As this is gonna be major
release feel free to do whatever you delayed for API concerns, clean up and
don't forget that for Neon both Eclipse Platform and CDT will req
- Original Message -
> From: "Jeff Johnston"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 November, 2015 12:09:12 AM
> Subject: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools 4.2.0 release and stable-4.2.0 branch
>
> Just to let everyone know that the 4.2.0 release is approaching fast (De
- Original Message -
> From: "Mario"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Friday, 6 November, 2015 1:19:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Contributing to the Docker tools
>
> Hello Max,
>
> I was looking for a superman t-shirt during the talk but could not spot you
> ;-
- Original Message -
> From: "Roland Grunberg"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Thursday, 5 November, 2015 11:09:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Contributing to the Docker tools
>
> > > In addition from the context of the editor, your contribution could
> > > take
- Original Message -
> From: "Xavier Coulon"
> To: "Roland Grunberg" , "Linux Tools developer
> discussions"
> Sent: Friday, 23 October, 2015 10:52:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Eclipse Vagrant Tooling
>
>
>
>
>
> On 22 Oct 2015, at 21:17, Roland Grunberg < rgrun...@redhat.c
- Original Message -
> From: "Roland Grunberg"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Thursday, 22 October, 2015 11:06:22 PM
> Subject: [linuxtools-dev] Next Linux Tools Release (4.2.0) ?
>
> >I would like to ship this as part of our Linux Tools 4.2.0 Release but
> >there are
Hi Xavier,
I am really sad to hear that. Your work gave birth of some of the most popular
parts of Linux Tools. Hopefully, you will find time for us again in the future.
If you want me to remove you from default assignee/qa fields in BZ let me know.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
-
y (today or tomorrow). I also think it's worth the major
> > version bump.
> >
> > Marc-Andre
> >
> > ____
> > From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> > [linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] on behalf of Aleksandar Kurtakov
> > [akurt...@redh
As our 3.2 release is out the plan is to have 4.0 released for Mars.
Even if we don't plan to do any major API breaking changes having lttng growing
into its own project (now Trace Compass) is worth major version bump.
I'm about to update our target definition to follow Platform 4.5 Milestone
bu
- Original Message -
> From: "Marc-André Laperle"
> To: cdt-...@eclipse.org, linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org,
> tracecompass-...@eclipse.org
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 9:02:29 PM
> Subject: [cdt-dev] Linux Tools LTTng moving to Trace Compass in Mars C/C++
> EPP
>
> Hello,
>
> As yo
rom: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 10:49:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Announcement: SWTBot tests
>
> ----- Original Message -
> > From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 10:48:12 AM
> Subject: Announcement: SWTBot tests
>
> I've committed a patch that ignores some of the failing test
I've committed a patch that ignores some of the failing tests.
I beg every contributor - PLEASE DO NOT ADD MORE SWTBOT tests.
I'm really tired of the instability of these tests. There are many problems
with these tests like:
* They are fragile - a widget being added/removed in other components br
I am pleased to announce that the 3.1.0 minor release is now available
from our update site. Details available in the N&N page [1].
This release is the Linux Tools contribution for Luna SR1.
The tag v3.1.0b maps to commit ede48f1977460adc1a16b8393cbf9f20ddaab74a and
corresponds to build 50 in Hud
- Original Message -
> From: "Jeff Johnston"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 12:54:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Feature/Plugin versioning policy
>
> ----- Original Message -
> > From:
annotation will reveal
> this just the same.
That would be a bit too much I think though I would not mind it that way if
decided (I use this practice for shelled/fedorapackager as it's plain easier).
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
>
> -- Jeff J.
>
> - Origin
Having features being bumped to the release version and plugins following API
rules sounds like the correct thing to do as that way it's clear what you
install from update sites.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Doug Schaefer"
> To: "Linux Tools de
Hi everyone,
After the sonar server switch yesterday, Linux Tools sonar job started to fail
with Unknown component:
org.eclipse.linuxtools.ctf:org.eclipse.linuxtools.ctf.parser:org.eclipse.linuxtools.ctf.parser.CTFLexer.
See e.g. https://hudson.eclipse.org/linuxtools/job/linuxtools-sonar/777/co
It's also in the main contributor guide -
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Linux_Tools_Project/Getting_Involved#Target_Platform .
Though I have to admit we failed at announcing this to the mailing list. Sorry
about that.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Mar
velopment Tools, Wind River
> direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> [mailto:linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Aleksandar Kurtakov
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 9:50 AM
> To
I'm going to switch our master build to build with Java 8 unless someone
objects. This should have zero effect for users as target is determined by BREE
from tycho but would have 2 positive effects for us:
* less burden for our HIPP instance - really visible when waiting for verify
* stricter Jav
ody has any question, or comments on the new project or the
> proposal [1], please let us know! We will announce our plans, new
> website, git repos, etc. as we get them.
Let the comunity grow even bigger,
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
>
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
>
Hi everyone,
I was just made aware of http://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/trace-compass.
Is it a proposal to move the content of lttng suproject altogether to separate
project or just parts of it?
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
___
linuxtoo
If no one propose something to improve the last year one. I would say repeat it.
For reference:
https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/linuxtools-dev/msg02631.html
https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/linuxtools-dev/msg02671.html
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message
Please do so. If we can get more stable swtbot I would be more than happy.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Marc-André Laperle"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2014 5:55:53 PM
> Subject: [linuxtools-dev] Failing SWT
t;
> Thank you,
> Marc-Andre
>
> On 14-04-29 03:46 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Require Change-Id in commit message should be enabled now.
> >
> > Alexander Kurtakov
> > Red Hat Eclipse team
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: &
Require Change-Id in commit message should be enabled now.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 9:54:18 AM
> Subject: Re
I'll check with Than.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Marc-André Laperle"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 9:04:22 PM
> Subject: [linuxtools-dev] Gerrit option: Require Change-Id in commit message
>
> Hi,
>
__
> From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org]
> on behalf of Aleksandar Kurtakov [akurt...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 15 April 2014 2:57 AM
> To: Linux Tools developer discussions
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Upgrading to Tycho 0.21.0-SNAPSH
- Original Message -
> From: "Marc-André Laperle"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 3:10:30 AM
> Subject: [linuxtools-dev] Upgrading to Tycho 0.21.0-SNAPSHOT
>
> Hi,
>
> We have seen some issues with our tests with Tycho 0.20.0 in certain
> enviro
With my SWT-hat on - make sure that you disable menuproxy and
scrollbar-overlays (UBUNTU_MENUPROXY=0 LIBOVERLAY_SCROLLBAR=0 eclipse). These
two have been identified to cause many problems there are people working on
fixing them in Ubuntu but I don't know details. If this doesn't fix the problem
I would recommend getting the tarball from cgit.
http://git.eclipse.org/c/linuxtools/org.eclipse.linuxtools.git/snapshot/org.eclipse.linuxtools-2.2.1.tar.bz2
For the last few releases we were coping it to downloads area for "compat"
reasons and the 2.2.1-sources is purely a mistake so I removed
Hi everyone,
What do you think of switching our gerrit configuration from cherry-pick to
forward only ? This would remove the need for resetting your local clone after
every review pushed and/or later merge/reset. It will not introduce any major
drawback in my opinion but I would like to hear o
I saw the problem now. We were missing the dataviewers in the nightly update
site but when testing it was satisfied by older luna contributions. I reverted
the commit removing the feature.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtako
This is a test job compiling against Java 8. Please keep an eye on it and
please fix your modules to compile on Java 8 properly.
Currently it fails in ctf.parser.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: hudsonbu...@eclipse.org
> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
7;s just the feature that is missing. Have you tried replacing
references to the feature with references to the bundles?
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
>
> Greg
>
> On Apr 7, 2014, at 4:43 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>
> > Short answer - https://git.eclipse.or
Short answer - https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/23365/ .
What do you need it for? I wouldn't mind bringing it back if someone steps in
to document and verify its actual reusability.
All the bundles are still there, just not the feature to prevent its sole
installation as the feature adds no real fu
Yes, this is https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=419172 .
I changed sonar job config to run on every 6h so we hopefully get at least 1
successful build every few days. It's abusing infrastructure but that's all I
can do. As soon as the bug is fixed configuration will be changed to one b
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 3:06:23 PM
> Subject: [linuxtools-dev] proctools directory removal
>
> Hi,
> proctools is staying in our git repo. We inheri
Hi,
proctools is staying in our git repo. We inherited it from sequoyah project if
someone wanted to keep it alive.
As:
* there are no changes since the import
* it's not integrated into the build and might not even be buildable anymore
* clearly noone is interested
I propose deleting it and i
"Xavier Raynaud"
> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 11:47:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools 3.0 N&N
>
> +1
>
> X
>
> On 01/16/2014 12:08 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > It is time t
Hi everyone,
It is time to start thinking about N&N as with every next release it gets
smaller and smaller despite features growing.
Would it help if we move to the wiki to maintain it ? Smth like
http://wiki.eclipse.org/CDT/User/NewIn83 should be easier considering not
having to do the git stuf
t Eclipse team
>
> Doug.
>
> On 12/5/2013, 1:05 PM, "Aleksandar Kurtakov" wrote:
>
> >- Original Message -
> >> From: "David Meng"
> >> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 5,
As we already build with Java 7, I propose to start using 1.7 in tests
unconditionally aka builds would work only on Java 7 (already true for our
releases) until some decision is taken.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtako
ssage-
> From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> [mailto:linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Aleksandar Kurtakov
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 12:35 PM
> To: Linux Tools developer discussions
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Install linux tools plugin on Wind
- Original Message -
> From: "David Meng"
> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 7:32:08 PM
> Subject: [linuxtools-dev] Change ValgrindCoreParser to support different
> valgrind output format
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We have our own version of valgrind exe
- Original Message -
> From: "David Meng"
> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 7:24:46 PM
> Subject: [linuxtools-dev] Install linux tools plugin on Windows platform
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We want to use the valgrind tools on remote target and use the parse
No need to wait at all. Master is open for luna now and parent pom set to 3.0.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Alexandre Montplaisir"
> To: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> Cc: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
>
Lttng devs,
What is your plan to merge lttng-luna branch into master and killing lttng-luna
branch?
Do you use any luna specific APIs making it impossible to compile against
Kepler platform? PTP changed the remote tools so we would need a bit more time
before we can start compiling against Luna
Hi everyone,
I'm going to push bump to 3.0.0 version to our build system. I have few other
things I think would ease releng and general acceptance of our plugins:
* let features inherit their version from the main pom - this way features will
have the release version always as tycho will enforce
- Original Message -
> From: "Vladimir Prus"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:21:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] How to use the
> org.eclipse.linuxtools.perf plugin
>
> On 27.11.2013 19:48, Roland Grunberg wrote:
> >> Dm
- Original Message -
> From: "Dmitry Kozlov"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions" ,
> "hamdene ben-ayed"
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 3:15:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] How to use the org.eclipse.linuxtools.perf
> plugin
>
> Hello Hamdene,
> we also used perf
o follow suit with CDT. I can't wait to use some
> > of the nice things it comes with (switch on strings, try-with-resources,
> > etc.)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Alexandre
> >
> >
> > On 13-11-25 03:33 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >> Hi eve
- Original Message -
> From: "Marc-André Laperle"
> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:27:50 PM
> Subject: [linuxtools-dev] Release and branch planning
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to clarify the current plan for Linux Tools. Is this plan
> correct?
Almost.
Hi everyone,
I see few reviews on gerrit about bringing back support for Java 6. So it's
time to start discussing that:
Do we need to support Java 6 for Luna? Especially considering how much we
depend on CDT and [1]. I'm all for moving ahead and make Java 7 minimum
required version for our 3.0
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:57:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools 2.2 release dates
>
> As no one objected the new release date is
As no one objected the new release date is December 20th, as changed in portal.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 4:02:53
Hi everyone,
Linux Tools 2.2 is currently scheduled for December 17th, which is quite close
to Christmas and this makes me think that we would better ship it earlier so we
don't have to rush at this precious time of the year or delay the release after
New Year and miss the Kepler SR2 timeframe.
Hi everyone,
Please take a look at - our build has timed out something that hasn't happened
in the last few months but was kind of common in the past.
Reminder: Keeping our tests both good and fast is important so we can make
better use of infrastructure.
https://hudson.eclipse.org/linuxtools/j
Does anyone still care for the juno bulid? According to me it's long time dead
and if noone steps in to fix it I'll ask webmaster to just delete this job.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: hudsonbu...@eclipse.org
> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> Sent:
Hi everyone,
I've just changed our Hudson job that takes care of the gerrit verifications to
also run tests - this is all possible due to the move to project specific
Hudson instance.
Builds without tests take less than 5 mins and with tests enabled just under
30min. Considering that the previ
Note to all,
I pushed
http://git.eclipse.org/c/linuxtools/org.eclipse.linuxtools.git/commit/?id=9caea339a90b37d3cb638b625e61402deddaee17
without review in order to be able to test it.
Using platform instead of sdk is the right thing to do and according to hudson
(https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudso
- Original Message -
> From: "Jeff Johnston"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 9:26:42 PM
> Subject: [linuxtools-dev] What New Features Are Scheduled for 2.1?
>
> A recent discussion on cross-project list is a cause for concern.
>
> Apparently,
- Original Message -
> From: "Roland Grunberg"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 8:00:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Remote oprofile
>
> > Regarding remote stuffs, it was added a testing infrastructure
> > (https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/11612/
- Original Message -
> From: "Wainer Moschetta"
> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 7:04:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Remote oprofile
>
>
> On 07/02/2013 11:56 AM, Roland Grunberg wrote:
> >> Roland, why wasn't it part of our Kepler contribution?
> >>
- Original Message -
> From: "Wainer Moschetta"
> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 4:55:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools Luna plan - initial proposal
>
> On 06/11/2013 03:38 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote
- Original Message -
> From: "Wainer Moschetta"
> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:31:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools Luna plan - initial proposal
>
> On 06/04/2013 02:57 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote
- Original Message -
> From: "Roland Grunberg"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 8:34:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Away until Monday June 10th
>
> Given the proximity to RC4, the scope of the changes, and that any
> possible alternatives w
- Original Message -
> From: "Alexandre Montplaisir"
> To: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> Cc: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 6:32:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools Luna plan - initial proposal
&
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2013 9:16:16 AM
> Subject: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools Luna plan - initial proposal
>
> Hi everyone,
> Let's try to plan
Hi everyone,
Let's try to plan our releases during Luna . Here is what I have in mind - feel
free to say I'm nuts and propose a better one :):
* 2.0.1 release - our Kepler SR1 (August 28th?) - strictly bug fixing - no API
breakage.
* 2.1 - new feature release (Late November) - new features and n
Hi everyone,
So we are upto M7 now and some endgame items are pending.
* Documentation - Our web site is in git (in case someone missed that)
http://git.eclipse.org/c/www.eclipse.org/linuxtools.git/. I did some quick
changes to the N&N so newer news pages should contain only the current release
t is installed with the systemtap plugin.
>
> -William
>
> -Original Message-
> From: linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> [mailto:linuxtools-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On Behalf Of Aleksandar Kurtakov
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 1:29 PM
> To: L
- Original Message -
> From: "Weilei Chen (William)"
> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 6:32:20 AM
> Subject: [linuxtools-dev] SystemTapGUI vs org.eclipse.linuxtools.systemtap?
>
> Hi Guys,
> While I was evaluating org.eclipse.linuxtools.systemtap, I came acro
We have a number of branches which we might not need anymore. What do you think
about getting rid of them?
Looking at
http://git.eclipse.org/c/linuxtools/org.eclipse.linuxtools.git/refs/heads I
spot at least:
* feature/autotools/autotools-to-cdt
* rdt
* systemtap-stabalize
There are also lttng-
team
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 9:57:52 AM
> Subject: Lttng tests breaking nightlies/sonar
>
> What's going on there? Is it just a temporary failure
What's going on there? Is it just a temporary failure or smth not expected to
be fixed in a day? If the later please disable the tests in question until they
are fixed.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
___
linuxtools-dev mailing list
linuxtools
Noone objected so https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/10190/
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 3:24:02 PM
> Subject: [linuxto
Does anyone uses the tarballs as provided at
http://download.eclipse.org/linuxtools/1.2.0-sources/ ?
Since we moved to git we have an automated tarball download for the whole repo
thanks to cgit
http://git.eclipse.org/c/linuxtools/org.eclipse.linuxtools.git/tag/?id=v1.2.0
With the closer integra
hanks for the info John.
As noone said a word to save this functionality I'm starting to remove it.
If one objects there is still chance to -1 in gerrit. :)
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
>
> John
>
>
>
>
> From: Aleksandar Kurtakov
> To: Linux Tools de
Hi everyone,
SystemTap plugin has a bunch of code that does "recent files management",
workbench advisoring (views, sizes, etc.). Is this code relevant? Does someone
care about it? Ever tested it ? I'm not even sure that the workbench advisor
works considering the Eclipse 4 changes.
If noone ca
- Original Message -
> From: "Wainer Moschetta"
> To: linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:01:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Use of Java 6 classes break compile
>
> On 01/15/2013 05:52 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote
- Original Message -
> From: "sami wagiaalla"
> To: "Linux Tools developer discussions"
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 9:48:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [linuxtools-dev] Use of Java 6 classes break compile
>
> > Furthermore, the JDT preference set in the plugin's
> > .settings/org.eclips
This commit really makes me sad.
Copy/pasting code is not the way to do stuff.
* We have shared bundles where implementation for such components can be put
* we have class inheritance so a base class containing the common functionality
with children for local and remote stuff are still an option
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
