[linuxtools-dev] Welcome Roberto Oliveira as a new tools.linuxtools Committer

tools.linuxtools Committers, This automatically generated message marks the completion of all the legal paperwork and webmaster provisioning for Roberto Oliveira. Roberto Oliveira is a new full Committer on the tools.linuxtools project. Welcome! ___ linu

[linuxtools-dev] Welcome Mat Booth as a new tools.linuxtools Committer

tools.linuxtools Committers, This automatically generated message marks the completion of all the legal paperwork and webmaster provisioning for Mat Booth. Mat Booth is a new full Committer on the tools.linuxtools project. Welcome! ___ linuxtools-dev mai

[linuxtools-dev] Welcome Neil Guzman as a new tools.linuxtools Committer

tools.linuxtools Committers, This automatically generated message marks the completion of all the legal paperwork and webmaster provisioning for Neil Guzman. Neil Guzman is a new full Committer on the tools.linuxtools project. Welcome! ___ linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] Welcome Camilo Bernal as a new tools.linuxtools Committer

tools.linuxtools Committers, This automatically generated message marks the completion of all the legal paperwork and webmaster provisioning for Camilo Bernal. Camilo Bernal is a new full Committer on the tools.linuxtools project. Welcome! ___ linuxtools

[linuxtools-dev] Committer vote for Camilo Bernal has concluded successfully

? Matthew Khouzam +1 Alexander Kurtakov ? Rafael Medeiros Teixeira ? Alexandre Montplaisir +1 Andrew Overholt +1 Otavio Pontes ? Xavier Raynaud ? Patrick Tasse ? Niels Thykier ? Sami Wagiaalla If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your

[linuxtools-dev] Vote for Committer status for Camilo Bernal was started by Alexander Kurtakov

tools.linuxtools Committers, This automatically generated message signals that Alexander Kurtakov has nominated Camilo Bernal as a Committer on the tools.linuxtools project. The reason given is as follows: Camilo is actively working on the profiling tools and a number of his patches are already

[linuxtools-dev] Committer vote for Camilo Bernal has concluded successfully

Jeff Johnston ? Matthew Khouzam +1 Alexander Kurtakov ? Rafael Medeiros Teixeira +1 Alexandre Montplaisir +1 Andrew Overholt +1 Otavio Pontes ? Xavier Raynaud +1 Patrick Tasse ? Niels Thykier +1 Sami Wagiaalla If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to

[linuxtools-dev] Vote for Committer status for Camilo Bernal was started by Alexander Kurtakov

technology.linux-distros Committers, This automatically generated message signals that Alexander Kurtakov has nominated Camilo Bernal as a Committer on the technology.linux-distros project. The reason given is as follows: Camilo is actively working on the profiling tools and a number of his

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Rodrigo Fraxino Araujo on technology.linux-distros by Alexander Kurtakov

Alexander Kurtakov voted: +1 Welcome, Rodrigo! Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Rafael Medeiros Teixeira on technology.linux-distros by Alexander Kurtakov

Alexander Kurtakov voted: +1 Welcome, Rafael! Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Alexandre Montplaisir on technology.linux-distros by Alexander Kurtakov

Alexander Kurtakov voted: +1 Welcome! Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Matthew Khouzam on technology.linux-distros by Alexander Kurtakov

Alexander Kurtakov voted: +1 Welcome Matthew! Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] Welcome Krzysztof Daniel as a new technology.linux-distros Committer

technology.linux-distros Committers, This automatically generated message marks the completion of all the legal paperwork and webmaster provisioning for Krzysztof Daniel. Krzysztof Daniel is a new full Committer on the technology.linux-distros project. Welcome!

[linuxtools-dev] Committer vote for Krzysztof Daniel has concluded successfully

paperwork and provisioning the account. Vote summary: 12/0/0 with 3 not voting +1 Chris Aniszczyk +1 Elliott Baron ? Francois Chouinard +1 Severin Gehwolf +1 Roland Grunberg +1 Bernd Hufmann ? Anithra P Janakiraman +1 Jeff Johnston +1 Alexander Kurtakov +1 Andrew

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Daniel Henrique Barboza on technology.linux-distros by Alexander Kurtakov

Alexander Kurtakov voted: +1 Welcome. Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] Vote for Committer status for Krzysztof Daniel was started by Alexander Kurtakov

technology.linux-distros Committers, This automatically generated message signals that Alexander Kurtakov has nominated Krzysztof Daniel as a Committer on the technology.linux-distros project. The reason given is as follows: Krzysztof is really making a difference in the eclipse-build subproject

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Some features have been pushed to 1.0.0 prematurely

On 20:25:35 Friday 28 October 2011 Jeff Johnston wrote: > Actually, I just realized I am mistaken regarding the next release part > of this. Our 0.9.1 release will be an Indigo update and built from the > stable-0.9 branch, not master. So, Alex, are we fine marking our Juno > milestone builds as

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Patrick Tasse on technology.linux-distros by Alexander Kurtakov

Alexander Kurtakov voted: +1 Looks like a whole lot of contribution. Welcome Patrick Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Otavio Pontes on technology.linux-distros by Alexander Kurtakov

Alexander Kurtakov voted: +1 We definetely need more help! Welcome, Otavio Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Attention: Major changes for Tycho 0.13 compatibility

On 18:18:04 Thursday 06 October 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > * akurtakov [2011-10-06 02:28]: > > >> 3. Bundle/Feature naming - that's what provoked this mail, I > > >> appreciate the fact that tycho devs showed the problem. It's > > >> confusing (at least) especially in feature.xml files (include

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Release 0.9

On 19:06:39 Friday 07 October 2011 Francois Chouinard wrote: > Hello, > > I am considering getting involved a little more in the Linux Tools release > activities and 0.9 could be a nice opportunity to spread the > load/competence at little more. > > This release is scheduled for Oct/26 and it is

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Eclipse Build: Designating a stable branch eclipse37

On 18:23:55 Thursday 06 October 2011 sami wagiaalla wrote: > On 10/05/2011 09:49 AM, akurtakov wrote: > > Shouldn't we build later milestone? > > Yup, I'll tackle M2 soon. > > > This work will be reused for 3.7.1, > > at least the git fetch part. > > Sounds good. We can use the eclipse37 branch

Re: [linuxtools-dev] IP CQs waiting on your team

On 20:20:07 Saturday 01 October 2011 portal on behalf of emo wrote: > linuxtools-dev, > IPZilla records show that one or more of the projects on which you are > developer are in need of attention. The following CQs have been in the > 'awaiting_project' status for over 3 weeks and need your team t

Re: [linuxtools-dev] How manpage plug-ins work?

I can't sign for working on anytime soon but help is more than welcome and I'll kindly review and apply patches. Regards, Alexander Kurtakov > > - Wainer > ___ > linuxtools-dev mailing list

[linuxtools-dev] Attention: Major changes for Tycho 0.13 compatibility

ber 10th switch to Tycho 0.13 will happen so consider commenting sooner than later. Alexander Kurtakov ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Hudson build is still unstable: linuxtools-master #503

On 09:49:37 Friday 09 September 2011 hudsonbu...@eclipse.org wrote: > See Valgrind tests are failing for quite a few builds now. Could someone please take a look at them? Alex > > > _

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Syncing pom.xml and feature.xml/MANIFEST.MF (was Re: Build failed in Hudson: linuxtools-master #483)

On 08:39:18 Monday 22 August 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > * akurtakov [2011-08-22 15:09]: > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > > * Alexander Kurtakov [2011-08-20 01:56]: > > >> On 08:50:01 Saturday 20 August 2011 Andrew Overholt wro

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Syncing pom.xml and feature.xml/MANIFEST.MF (was Re: Build failed in Hudson: linuxtools-master #483)

On 08:50:01 Saturday 20 August 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > * Andrew Overholt [2011-08-19 16:33]: > > * Alexander Kurtakov [2011-08-19 16:31]: > > > On 23:29:56 Friday 19 August 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > > > > > > > > > mvn tycho-v

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Syncing pom.xml and feature.xml/MANIFEST.MF (was Re: Build failed in Hudson: linuxtools-master #483)

On 23:37:40 Friday 19 August 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > * Alexander Kurtakov [2011-08-19 16:31]: > > On 23:29:56 Friday 19 August 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > > > > > > > > mvn tycho-versions:set-version -DnewVersion=YOUR_VERSION will > > > > >

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Syncing pom.xml and feature.xml/MANIFEST.MF (was Re: Build failed in Hudson: linuxtools-master #483)

On 23:29:56 Friday 19 August 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > > > > > > mvn tycho-versions:set-version -DnewVersion=YOUR_VERSION will do > > > > > > the > > > > Please note that if you run it in valgrind directory it will change the > > valgrind parent pom and all references to it but it will not cha

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Syncing pom.xml and feature.xml/MANIFEST.MF (was Re: Build failed in Hudson: linuxtools-master #483)

On 23:01:13 Friday 19 August 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > * Alexander Kurtakov [2011-08-19 15:22]: > > On 22:19:57 Friday 19 August 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > > > * Alexander Kurtakov [2011-08-19 14:57]: > > > > mvn tycho-versions:set-version -DnewVe

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Syncing pom.xml and feature.xml/MANIFEST.MF (was Re: Build failed in Hudson: linuxtools-master #483)

On 22:19:57 Friday 19 August 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > * Alexander Kurtakov [2011-08-19 14:57]: > > mvn tycho-versions:set-version -DnewVersion=YOUR_VERSION will do the > > right thing keeping things in sync. > > This seems promising but how should it be used? If I try

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Build failed in Hudson: linuxtools-master #483

On 21:56:09 Friday 19 August 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > > [Anithra P Janakiraman] Change feature version to 1.2.0 > > It looks like Anithra forgot to change the version in the matching > pom.xml. Where possible, please run local builds before pushing changes > so that we don't have broken buil

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Synchronizing feature versions < 1.0.0

On 17:16:09 Tuesday 16 August 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > * Alexander Kurtakov [2011-08-16 10:04]: > > I don't understand the question about aligning the features. Do we want > > them to be the same as the release version? > > For the ones < 1.0.0, yes. >

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Synchronizing feature versions < 1.0.0

On 16:56:20 Tuesday 16 August 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > * akurtakov [2011-08-16 03:05]: > > It's not that hard for someone to run e.g. > > mvn tycho-versions:set-version -DnewVersion=0.9.0 just before tagging and > > mvn tycho-versions:set-version -DnewVersion=0.9.1-SNAPSHOT for the > > next r

[linuxtools-dev] Linux tools 0.9 release

Is it time to discuss the next feature release? >From my POV we are gathering a number of new features: * specfile editor - flat layout support * rpmstubby - starting to provide public api for integrators * sami's work on form based autotools editor * changelog egit support * others I'm not aware o

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Problems with eclipse-build-5791c48513b4207ab1eec1e00bed4b2186f9aad5.tar.xz

On 16:20:57 Friday 22 July 2011 Thomas Gellekum wrote: > Moin, > > for the FreeBSD port of Eclipse-3.7.0, we're using the files available > from Welcome FreeBSD it's nice to see the list growing :) > http://download.eclipse.org/technology/linuxtools/eclipse-build/3.7.x_Indig > o/. I have a few qu

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Build failed in Hudson: linuxtools-master #432

On 03:54:47 PM Thursday, June 30, 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > Hi, > The failures from yesterday were definetely caused by profiling and valgrind versions being out of sync in pom.xml and manifest.mf. Everyone, please always update both! Regards, Alex > The emails seem to be picking out the

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Sami Wagiaalla on technology.linux-distros by Alexander Kurtakov

Alexander Kurtakov voted: +1 Welcome, Sami :) Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Java RPM library

On 05:23:01 PM Wednesday, June 01, 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > Hi, > > Pascal sent me a link to a pure Java RPM library. I don't know if it > can be of any use to us but I thought I'd pass it along. > > Updated source location: > > https://github.com/craigwblake/redline I have been packagi

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Oprofile plugins run opreport too many times?

On 12:31:36 PM Wednesday, May 25, 2011 Vladimir Prus wrote: > On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 23:14:37 Andrew Overholt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > * Vladimir Prus [2011-05-24 15:04]: > > > Does anybody know whether the current behaviour has some motivation, > > > or it's purely historic? > > > > It could ea

[linuxtools-dev] Tycho 0.12.0 and unit tests

Hi everyone, As you may noticed already I have updated our build to tycho 0.12(the latest release version) which is proposed to be donated to Eclipse.org. As Tycho is becoming more and more important we should not stay on an old release that was not at Eclipse.org if only even for IP purposes (I

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linuxtools update site

On 12:36:31 PM Tuesday, May 10, 2011 Alexander Kurtakov wrote: > On 10:38:13 AM Monday, May 09, 2011 Bernd Hufmann wrote: > > Hi Alex > > > > Thank you for your help. Sorry, I'm pretty new with tycho and hudson. I > > still have to learn more about it. Could you p

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linuxtools update site

27;t happen when building locally. I'm still investigating, Alex > > Best Regards > Bernd > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote: > > Hi Bernd, > > > > I think that we have a problem with our tycho build referencing artifacts &g

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linuxtools update site

Hi Bernd, I think that we have a problem with our tycho build referencing artifacts found in the Indigo repository instead of local artifacts. Can you verify that you have the same problem when trying to install manually downloaded repo from hudson? Regards, Alex On 06:17:47 PM Saturday, May

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Parsing c++ doxygen comments.

On 05:35:35 PM Saturday, April 30, 2011 Germán Diago wrote: > Hello. > > I've been using eclipse linuxtools for a while and I think that you're > all doing a great work > with valgrind, oprofile, etc. > > I would like to ask you when c++ doxygen comments parsing will be > available. It's a featur

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Athena -> Tycho

On 12:02:34 PM Thursday, April 14, 2011 Xavier RAYNAUD wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Is it possible for you to post the content of your ~/.m2/settings.xml? > I suspect some missing stuff in my own. Hi Xavier, I don't have settings.mxl and it works ok for me. The build has been broken if you don't have

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Welcome Niels Thykier as a new technology.linux-distros Committer

On 05:05:05 PM Tuesday, April 05, 2011 portal on behalf of Alexander Kurtakov wrote: > technology.linux-distros Committers, > This automatically generated message marks the completion of all the legal > paperwork and webmaster provisioning for Niels Thykier. Niels Thykier is a &

[linuxtools-dev] Welcome Niels Thykier as a new technology.linux-distros Committer

technology.linux-distros Committers, This automatically generated message marks the completion of all the legal paperwork and webmaster provisioning for Niels Thykier. Niels Thykier is a new full Committer on the technology.linux-distros project. Welcome! __

[linuxtools-dev] Committer vote for Niels Thykier has concluded successfully

paperwork and provisioning the account. Vote summary: 7/0/0 with 8 not voting +1 Elliott Baron ? Nick Boldt ? Francois Chouinard +1 Severin Gehwolf +1 Roland Grunberg +1 Bernd Hufmann ? Anithra P Janakiraman +1 Jeff Johnston +1 Alexander Kurtakov ? Phil Muldoon +1

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Vote for Committer status for Niels Thykier was started by Alexander Kurtakov

On 10:14:26 am Wednesday, March 23, 2011 portal on behalf of Alexander Kurtakov wrote: > technology.linux-distros Committers, > This automatically generated message signals that Alexander Kurtakov has > nominated Niels Thykier as a Committer on the technology.linux-distros > project

[linuxtools-dev] Vote for Committer status for Niels Thykier was started by Alexander Kurtakov

technology.linux-distros Committers, This automatically generated message signals that Alexander Kurtakov has nominated Niels Thykier as a Committer on the technology.linux-distros project. The reason given is as follows: Niels is working on our elipse-build subproject verifying that it is

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Committer vote for Chris Aniszczyk has been approved by the PMC

On 09:21:31 am Friday, March 18, 2011 portal on behalf of portal-noreply wrote: > technology.linux-distros Committers, > This automatically generated message marks the PMC's approval of the vote > for Chris Aniszczyk's full Committer status on the technology.linux-distros > project. The next step

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for Chris Aniszczyk on technology.linux-distros by Alexander Kurtakov

Alexander Kurtakov voted: +1 Welcome Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] Wiki pages

Hi everyone, Please add the following snippet in all your wiki pages related to the Linux Tools project: {{#eclipseproject:technology.linux-distros}} {{Linux_Tools}} This will ensure that the standard menu and infobox are shown on every page. It is also good to add link to your pages in one of t

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools Next release questions

On 11:16:07 am Wednesday, February 23, 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > > * Is is going to be called 0.8? > > I vote yes on calling it 0.8. OK. Noone else responded so it's gonna be 0.8 :). > > > * We should start the release process really early this time so we can be > > a proper part of the rel

[linuxtools-dev] Linux Tools Next release questions

Hi everyone, Now that 0.7 is out we should start planning for our next release that will be part of Indigo train. Here are few things to consider: * Is is going to be called 0.8? * We should start the release process really early this time so we can be a proper part of the release train. Does any

[linuxtools-dev] Announcement: Linux Tools 0.7 is here

e enhance our documentation at http://wiki.eclipse.org/Linux_Tools_Project/User_Guides so we can get an even better documented Indigo release. P.S. There was a long delay in the release process due to my inability to sort all the things a release engineer needs to do. Regards, Alexander

[linuxtools-dev] Release 0.7 is coming :)

Hi, Sorry for the long delay guys. We have passed the release review and I've retagged Changelog plugin for #332621. Sadly our latest bug has one more test failure https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cbi-linuxtools-Helios/410/testReport/ . Jeff, what do you think about them? I'm not able to

Re: [linuxtools-dev] 0.7 release again

OK to do so. Regards, Alex > > I'm asking because I have a fix that came in that branch after you took the > snapshot and it likely doesn't have the right label (if any). > > Otherwise, it's OK with me. > > Regards, > /fc > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 a

[linuxtools-dev] 0.7 release again

e 0.7 branch. Also as it was previously announced trunk is now heading towards Indigo(3.7) and 0.7 is going to be the last release for Helios(3.6). Waiting for your opinion, Alexander Kurtakov ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Move to git ... let's vote

On 04:19:47 pm Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Andrew Overholt wrote: > Hi! > > Happy new year, everyone. If you recently had some holidays, I hope > they were nice. > > I know we discussed this before but I'd like to once again bring up the > topic of moving to git. I've been using git on the comm

Re: [linuxtools-dev] 0.7 release

On 03:15:31 pm Wednesday, November 24, 2010 Alexander Kurtakov wrote: > Hi all, > As you remember we have scheduled our 0.7 release for December 1st. > I'll branch on Friday so be sure to put everything properly in svn by then. > Also there is new-0.7 folder in the website plea

[linuxtools-dev] Welcome Severin Gehwolf as a new technology.linux-distros Committer

technology.linux-distros Committers, This automatically generated message marks the completion of all the legal paperwork and webmaster provisioning for Severin Gehwolf. Severin Gehwolf is a new full Committer on the technology.linux-distros project. Welcome! __

[linuxtools-dev] +1 for bhufmann on technology.linux-distros by Alexander Kurtakov

Alexander Kurtakov voted: +1 Welcome Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/ ___ linuxtools-dev mailing list linuxtools-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxtools-dev

[linuxtools-dev] Committer vote for Severin Gehwolf has concluded successfully

paperwork and provisioning the account. Vote summary: 6/0/0 with 7 not voting +1 Elliott Baron ? Nick Boldt +1 Francois Chouinard +1 Roland Grunberg ? Anithra P Janakiraman +1 Jeff Johnston +1 Alexander Kurtakov ? Phil Muldoon ? Andrew Overholt ? Xavier Raynaud

[linuxtools-dev] 0.7 release

Hi all, As you remember we have scheduled our 0.7 release for December 1st. I'll branch on Friday so be sure to put everything properly in svn by then. Also there is new-0.7 folder in the website please edit it if you want your work to be mentioned. Testing builds will be done from the branches

[linuxtools-dev] Vote for Committer status for Severin Gehwolf was started by Alexander Kurtakov

technology.linux-distros Committers, This automatically generated message signals that Alexander Kurtakov has nominated Severin Gehwolf as a Committer on the technology.linux-distros project. The reason given is as follows: Severin will be good addition to our team and he has already proved that

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Integration of GDB Tracepoints in Linux Tools

to change the name?) and put tmf there. Of course keep in mind the soon to come 0.7 release and commit things you are not sure will be ready for it only in branches. Regards, Alexander Kurtakov > > Best Regards, > /fc > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Integration of GDB Tracepoints in Linux Tools

Hi Francois, I'm writing a checklist for new subprojects it would be good if we can validate the gdb tracepoint subproject by this checklist. About the TMF can you point me to the svn path so I can take a look whether it is mergeable with the current profiling framework. Alex K. > Hello Lin

[linuxtools-dev] Web site update

Hi all, Our website has been updated to the default Eclipse team - Nova. Please take a look at your project pages to make sure they look good and don't hesitate to drop me a line if there are problems you can't fix. Alex ___ linuxtools-dev mailing li

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Next release planning

e objects in the next few days I'll update our schedule. No reply?? It's official - Next release is going to contain new features and break API. Date: December 1st Version: 0.7.0 Alexander Kurtakov > > > Regards, > > /fc > > > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:47

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Next release planning

27;s call for for 0.7 in the beginning of December on 1st . This release is going to be based on Helios and I would like to see work for Indigo starting right after branching for release so we can contribute to Indigo M4. If noone objects in the next few days I'll update our schedule. Alexan

[linuxtools-dev] Next release planning

whether it will be called 0.6.2 or 0.7 * rpmstubby - nothing changed * rpm-editor - just small changes, which are not bugfixes and because of that are done in trunk only, but they don't deserve a full release yet Others? Alexander Kurtakov ___

[linuxtools-dev] Announcement: Eclipse Linux Tools 0.6.1 release

The Eclipse Linux Tools team is pleased to announce our 0.6.1 release! It is available now from our update site: http://download.eclipse.org/technology/linuxtools/update Should you prefer a zip of the release, it is available at our downloads page: http://www.eclipse.org/linuxtools/downloads.p

[linuxtools-dev] Committer vote for Niels Thykier has concluded successfully

paperwork and provisioning the account. Vote summary: 7/0/0 with 7 not voting +1 Elliott Baron ? Nick Boldt ? William Bourque +1 Francois Chouinard ? Roland Grunberg +1 Anithra P Janakiraman +1 Jeff Johnston +1 Alexander Kurtakov ? Phil Muldoon +1 Andrew Overholt

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Builds for Helios maintenance and Indigo

> * Alexander Kurtakov [2010-07-06 17:15]: > > I really want to see 0.6.1 released soon for eclipse-build which > > missed Helios release date. Not sure whether this automatically means > > that our SR1 release should be versioned 0.7.0. > > It doesn't. > &

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Builds for Helios maintenance and Indigo

> Hi, > > I've restarted our Hudson jobs. We have two active ones: > > https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cbi-linuxtools-Helios/ > (builds towards Helios service releases) > > https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cbi-linuxtools-Indigo/ > (builds towards our Indigo contribution) > > T

[linuxtools-dev] Vote for Committer status for Niels Thykier was started by Alexander Kurtakov

technology.linux-distros Committers, This automatically generated message signals that Alexander Kurtakov has nominated Niels Thykier as a Committer on the technology.linux-distros project. The reason given is as follows: Niels is working on our eclipse-build subproject verifying that it is

Re: [linuxtools-dev] FYI: Not including man page viewer in Helios contribution

> * Alexander Kurtakov [2010-06-01 15:39]: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I mistakenly added the man page viewer to our Helios contribution, > > > meaning it would be in the main Helios update site. Alex and I > > > discussed this offline a big and decide

Re: [linuxtools-dev] FYI: Not including man page viewer in Helios contribution

> Hi, > > I mistakenly added the man page viewer to our Helios contribution, > meaning it would be in the main Helios update site. Alex and I > discussed this offline a big and decided that it was best to remove it > as it's so new and not yet ready for something like Helios. I'm sorry > if anyo

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Supporting nightly updates for previous release

> I was briefly discussing this with Andrew, but thought I would pose the > idea here for comment. > > At present, we are building nightly updates from trunk. For the most > part, this isn't a problem. However, when we make any changes that > require latest versions of underlying plugins (e.g. w

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Successful 0.5 release review; final TODOs for 0.5

> On Wednesday 17 March 2010, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > Please do final testing. > > I've tested libhover, Valgrind, stubby, .spec editor, OProfile, and > ChangeLog. Before publishing 0.5, I'd like to have successful testing > reports for: > > - autotools > - systemtap > - callgraph > - ltt > -

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Move to git?

> Hi, > > In this bug: > > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257706 > > Denis (Eclipse webmaster extraordinaire) asks if any projects would like > to beta test a move to git. > > Here are my reasons _for_ participating: > > - many FOSS projects are already using git and thus people

Re: [linuxtools-dev] Rebuilding with Source Modifications

Hi Joel, We started Eclipse-build to ease building the whole Eclipse SDK, there was no intention to make it usable for developing a single bundle and testing modifications. If you want to modify and test this modifications you would better checkout the plugin from cvs and start/debug in Eclipse