Re: [Liquibase-user] Does anyone use Java 1.4?

2009-04-20 Thread Robert Fischer
Java 1.4 has been end-of-lifed: The EOL transition period began Dec, 11 2006 and will complete October 30th, 2008 http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/ Let's not IE6 this -- kill it, kill it now, kill it dead, and no more support. ~~ Robert. Christian Maslen wrote: Voxland, Nathan wrote: Is

Re: [Liquibase-user] Does anyone use Java 1.4?

2009-04-20 Thread Paul Keeble
If only it was that easy! 1.4 is the backbone of huge numbers of application servers still in active use out there, because JavaEE only recently got updated. These are also the environments where a tool like liquibase comes in most useful. I'd love to see the death of Java 1.4 as much as

[Liquibase-user] Res: Does anyone use Java 1.4?

2009-04-20 Thread Diego Moreira da Rosa
I don't care much about this, but I think that anyone who still needs Java 1.4 can download a previous version of Liquibase and use it, right? Diego - Mensagem original De: Paul Keeble cs...@yahoo.co.uk Para: liquibase-user@lists.sourceforge.net Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 20 de

[Liquibase-user] Res: Keeping the order of execution on local databases

2009-04-20 Thread Diego Moreira da Rosa
Developer A should have merged from the SCM, then done a complete re-test, including rebuilding the database. At least, that's how I see it. Yep, that is another solution I'd forgotten, but it is also one I was trying to avoid. In general, I would not recommend rebuilding the database

Re: [Liquibase-user] Res: Keeping the order of execution on local databases

2009-04-20 Thread David C. Hicks
I would agree that testing the migration should be a part of the development process, but I think of it as a level of testing that comes after my software. First and foremost, the software has to work with the version of the database that it is designed to run against. I do understand that