Joop and all,
This announcement to which Jay Fenello also pointed out yesterday
to the IFWP list and is being followed up here by Joop Teenstra is yet again
stark and overwhelming evidence in the willingness of the ICANN to actively,
without public input to engage in divisive political maneuver
Many people are concerned that the unelected, unaccountable interim ICANN
board is rushing through the process and over-extending its authority. The
following Petition to ICANN to turn the WIPO Report recommendations over to
a fully constituted DNSO for due consideration is being circulated prior
Everything You Never Wanted to Know About ICANN
Copyright (c) 1999 Jay Fenello -- All Rights Reserved
FDR once said "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you
can bet it was planned that way." As we approach the conclusion of the ICANN
formation process, these w
Members of the interim ICANN Board,
On your web page I now read the following discouraging phrase:
>"As the Initial Constituencies will not yet have been recognized, the
ICANN Board will not be considering any additional Constituencies at its
next meeting in Berlin."
As I am just in the process
Bill Lovell a écrit:
> Some relevant questions arise, however, and without taking
> any positions on them, I'll ask, anyway:
>
> 1) One complaint is that NSI has been getting beaucoup bucks
> on its contract, but the USG (i.e., us taxpayers) got nuthin. So
> isn't $62 mill in university researc
Patrick Greenwell a écrit:
>
> On Tue, 18 May 1999, Bill Lovell wrote:
>
> > The US District Court for the District of Columbia agreed that it
> > was a tax but said that Congress could retroactively authorize it,
> > which lawmakers did later that month.
>
> This most of all, is particularly a
At 08:15 PM 5/18/99 -0700, you wrote:
>On Tue, 18 May 1999, Bill Lovell wrote:
>
>> The US District Court for the District of Columbia agreed that it
>> was a tax but said that Congress could retroactively authorize it,
>> which lawmakers did later that month.
>
>This most of all, is particular
On Tue, 18 May 1999, Bill Lovell wrote:
> The US District Court for the District of Columbia agreed that it
> was a tax but said that Congress could retroactively authorize it,
> which lawmakers did later that month.
This most of all, is particularly appalling
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
From: "FEDIX OPPORTUNITY ALERT"
A US appeals court ruled Friday that the money in a $62-million
Internet Development fund was collected legally from registrants of
Internet addresses and could be spent on internet development. The
news delighted officials at the National S
> > http://www.telepolis.de/tp/english/inhalt/co/2839/1.html
> > Felix Stalder, "The End of Privacy as the Triumph of
> > Neoliberalism," 12 May 99
> SO in conclusion, I partly agree with the theme of this article,
> but only to a degree. One can protect ones privacy to a great
> degree an
Title: RE: [IFWP] Re: A Commentary on WIPO's final report on domain names
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think we would all be surprised to see the ICANN Board take action
in Bonn, since we will all be in Berlin waiting for them.
Based on actions we have seen to date, I be
In advance of the ICANN meetings in Berlin on May 25-27, a number of proposals,
recommendations, and reports have been posted for public comment on the ICANN
website in recent weeks. These items, together with the public comments
received, will be discussed at a public forum in Berlin on May 26,
Michael,
> As the Final Report contains a wealth of material that is new, or
> substantially different from the Interim Report, including the
> critical Annexes, further review and public comment is likely to be
> essential before ICANN takes action.
>
> [Please feel free to repost as approp
Title: RE: What does this mean about IDNO or TLDA?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stef,
Don Telage brought up this issue. It is interesting that there are so
many issues that have been brought up by rather intelligent,
well-thought individuals, and the only one to get post
Title: Closed v. Open TLDs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Message as sent to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is certainly validity to the prospect of both open and closed
TLDs in
both the ccTLD and gTLD areas. However, to further divide either
constituencies or the obvious com
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, William X. Walsh writes:
>
>
> Yes please do call the abusers to order, including the individual
> trying to do the same behind an organizational moniker.
Yes, please, shut Willie the Whiner up!
> William X. Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
General Whiner, DSo Internet S
Yes please do call the abusers to order, including the individual
trying to do the same behind an organizational moniker.
On Tue, 18 May 1999 10:36:30 -0400, Michael Sondow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>ICANN Board-
>
>ISOC has created a listserv, controlled by them, that they are
>calling the
ICANN Board-
ISOC has created a listserv, controlled by them, that they are
calling the NCDNHC list. That is a ruse and a lie. They have no
sanction to act as the NCDNHC, as you well know.
They have also told many people on regional and international lists
that the NCDNHC is holding Names Counci
At 22:34 17/05/1999 -0400, Jay Fenello wrote:
>
>
>FYI:
>
>
>http://www.icann.org/dnso/constituency_groups.html
>
>As the Initial Constituencies will not yet have been recognized, the ICANN
>Board will not be considering any additional Constituencies at its next
>meeting in Berlin.
>
Not reall
19 matches
Mail list logo
