This just in...
The final MAC Report may now be found at:
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rcs/macberlin.html
--karl--
Community:
Moments after the closure of Wednesday's ICANN Berlin meeting,
my gut reponse? Social issues are being dismissed in the urgent
rush to get the ball rolling, get the profits rolling in. This is unfortunate.
The DNS patterns established today will affect our world for a century.
We need
Ben and Wendy --
Thank you for your efforts to make remote participation
possible. I was very impressed with the camera work, the
real time scribe and the remote comments page. I really had
a sense that I was seeing what was going on in the room.
Aside from several "net congestion rebuffering"
Karl and all,
First please let me apologize for cross posting this to the MAC list.
My single biggest question is, what is the criterion for determining
legal identity?
I will have more comments on this report of the MAC meeting when some
of
our people get back from Berlin and we have
In case anyone else hasn't done so, please let
me be one of those that
says thank you for all the hard work the Berkman Center and yourself
have
put into making this information available.
hear, hear! Without them, we'd have just about zip.
--tony
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 08:55:39PM +0200, Ben Edelman wrote:
I'm interested in Ken's suggestions as expressed below and intend to follow
up with some specifics within a couple days after finishing this round of
travel.
Mostly wanted to make sure everyone knows that the meeting archive -- of
Hi, again.
I'm in the process of linking from my ICANN page
(www.domainhandbook.com/icann.html) to various pages in the Berkman Center
Berlin archive.
There's a broken link at:
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/berlin/archive/junmurai-pres/
Root Server Advisory Committee presentation by Jun
Ken Freed wrote:
As with most of us participating online (awake since 6 am in Denver),
I felt frustrated at never hearing our comments mentioned except as
something that would be read aloud at some future point. But the
point never came, the momentum in the room being too robust,
(to be
Deutsche Telekom provided Net connectivity, and Germanynet augmented our
own 25-stream realvideo server with their own. The rest of the
scribing/webcast/comments system has been floated by the Berkman Center,
with a commitment by ICANN to reimburse our hard costs once it's not penniless.
It was
It would have seemed cooler if I'd had any sense it was getting through
to the board.
PS - does anyone know who belonged to the voice that made the
anti-academic remark? Was it Roberts or a Board member?
--
A. Michael Froomkin |Professor of Law| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
U. Miami School
FWIW, the messages that said more than "go fast" or "go slow" *did* get
through to the board, most especially Michael's speicifc comments on the
WIPO doc and its annexes. We have a printout that I will distribute to the
board today. Also, we noted the balance of comments in favor of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
