ICANN's MAC and staff have tried to portray the Internet Community as
disinterested and lacking motivation to be informed and be a part of the
process.
An experience of mine over the last several weeks has shown me that this claim
has no real factual basis, and is instead nothing more than an
All,
For those that might be interested the NYT also provides a forum
on the "ICANN Happenings". You can post comments on their
web form there. Here is that link:
http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?13@@.eff205d
I don't know how many folks read this forum, but if you have
some comments,
Joop and all IDNO'ers,
I don't want to take away from Mikkis effort, but it is just possible
at the very least that Joop here has a very strong argument.
Is there really a need for a UDRP. I wonder this myself? BUt
we [INEGroup] have our prepared in response anyway. But now
that I think on
On September 25, 1999, a message from John Patrick of IBM was posted on
several of the the DNS-related mailing lists that I inhabit.
It is certainly important for those of us monitoring ICANN's activities to
hear the reasons behind IBM's involvement and bridge grant to ICANN.
Nonetheless, as
Does anyone have the date and contest for this outstanding comment?
In a recent New York Times article, Esther Dyson
was quoted as saying "With all due respect, we
are less interested in complaints about process"
and more interested in "doing real work and
moving forward."
Santiago meeting.
"The rats came out of their hiding place. New York was into its fifth day without
electricity.Even the sewer people came out
to enjoy the sun. There were few "actual"
people on the street, everyone that had a home to go to was at home, with guns and
candles and bibles open to the Psalms,
but
At 11:42 PM 9/25/99 , you wrote:
In a recent New York Times article, Esther Dyson
was quoted as saying "With all due respect, we
are less interested in complaints about process"
and more interested in "doing real work and
moving forward."
The quote was publicly raised with Esther on the
panel
All,
I as spokesman for INEGroup have posted our position on the
ICANN proposed bylaw changes which the deadline is today.
You may view them at:
http://www.icann.org/comments-mail/comment-bylaws/msg9.html
Information for posting your potential position on the proposed
ICANN bylaw changes
For all,
From: Jeff Williams, Spokesman INEGroup
To: Whom it may concern ICANN (Initial?) Interim Board)
Subject: Proposed ICANN Bylaw changes see:
http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws-changes-16sept99.htm
In keeping with the principals and requirements of the White
For all,
From: Jeff Williams, Spokesman INEGroup
To: Whom it may concern ICANN (Initial?) Interim Board)
Subject: Proposed ICANN Bylaw changes see:
http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws-changes-16sept99.htm
In keeping with the principals and requirements of the White
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Judith Oppenheimer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 09:50:46 -0400 (EDT)
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 27
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Judith Oppenheimer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 09:51:20 -0400 (EDT)
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 27
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Dinesh Nair
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 10:18:47 -0400 (EDT)
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 27
FYI:
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 15:03:08 -0400
To: Becky Burr [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Esther Dyson [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mike Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I may have missed something, but it seems to me that Green Paper and White
Paper are two distinct things.
The former was a draft, and is now buried in oblivion, while the second is
the current (as today, 1999-09-27) statement of policy of the USG.
As such, I don't understand in the following
At 12:51 PM 9/27/99 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may have missed something, but it seems to me that Green Paper and White
Paper are two distinct things.
The former was a draft, and is now buried in oblivion, while the second is
the current (as today, 1999-09-27) statement of policy of the USG.
As
At 06:51 PM 9/27/99 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may have missed something, but it seems to me that Green Paper and White
Paper are two distinct things.
The former was a draft, and is now buried in oblivion, while the second is
the current (as today, 1999-09-27) statement of policy of the
That's because your mail bounced for a week; I had to unsubscribe you.
There's a sign up form at http://lists.ifwp.org
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from
At 01:03 PM 9/27/99 , Jay Fenello wrote:
The White Paper is *not* quoted,
only referenced. If you can find
where the White Paper decides the
business model question, then by
all means, please post it.
It's worth noting that the "White Paper" has no
force or effect in US law or policy - which
At 12:51 PM 9/27/99 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The former was a draft, and is now buried in oblivion, while the second is
the current (as today, 1999-09-27) statement of policy of the USG.
Roberto:
"UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Management of Internet Names and Addresses
Path:
ns3.vrx.net!news2.best.com!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.direct.ca!tor-nx1.netcom.ca!tor-nn1.netcom.ca.POSTED!nospam
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Carbon)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: Valuation models for names?
Forwarded for informational purposes.
-FW: My resignation from the IDNO Steering Committee-
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: "William X. Walsh" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: My resignation from the IDNO Steering Committee
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As I
Thats the longest thing you've ever written, Will. What happened?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Sometimes you have to have patience with things that annoy you."
-Xena, "Xena: Warrior Princess"
How you manage to make ICANN's claims of a disinterested public into a
William X. Walsh website promo campaign is trully glorious to behold.
On Sun, 26 Sep 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:
ICANN's MAC and staff have tried to portray the Internet Community as
disinterested and lacking
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:
Forwarded for informational purposes.
-FW: My resignation from the IDNO Steering Committee-
I've deleted the rest, because only notice of your resignation is
important, the rest is the usual gibbersih and nonsense you ususally trade
He was exposed.
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
Thats the longest thing you've ever written, Will. What happened?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Sometimes you have to have patience with things that annoy you."
E-COMMERCE
Internet Tax Panel Faces Thorny Issues (CyberTimes)
House Republican leaders sent a letter to the 19-member Advisory Commission
on Electronic Commerce, a commission appointed by Congress last year to
report back on Internet taxation, reminding them that the reason the body
was formed
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Ken Stubbs wrote:
its sad to see the recent events with baptista, hollingsworth, rizzo etc
Ken. You have nothing to say with respect to hollingsworth or rizzo,
because in your own words, you don't know if their real or imaginary.
Now - with respect to myself, you know
Ken. Let's get real, what this is about is if Ken ever makes the millions
he needs to live a great life, and will Ken's friends make those millions
with Ken. Ken's afraid all his plans and those of his friends are going
to go down the drain. Ken worried he's going to lose power, a power he
If Esthers good, and I know she's top drawer - I'm certain she won't even
blink. Domainac's chance in being sued by Esther is remote.
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Rusty H. Hodge wrote:
I suspect that Domainac is trying to get himself sued by Esther, so
he can get some of the ICANN issues he's
That's "libel", Ken, not "liable".
And thats "they're = they are", not "their", Joe.
Carry on the good work. You both make me proud.
At 09:50 PM 9/27/99 -0400, you wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 27 21:50:56 1999
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received:
Joe and all,
Great that you pointed this out. Nice find. I could not agree more
with old Dick here either! He is right! Others might want to see the
letter in entirety at: http://www.freedom.gov/library/technology/itfaletter.asp
also one might want to see some of the issues on privacy as
Joe and all,
I think it is more likely that Esther knows that if she did sue,
she would lose and lose badly. I just wish that the site that
Russ put up was a little more lively! ;)
J. Baptista wrote:
If Esthers good, and I know she's top drawer - I'm certain she won't even
blink.
Wow, there is a taxation vacuum. I should have thought of founding the
ICANN. Who else will be able to collect these taxes in behalf of all those
jurisdictions?
ag
- Original Message -
From: J. Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
Jay Fenello wrote:
The White Paper is *not* quoted,
only referenced.
I stand corrected.
You are right.
Roberto
Mr. Sexton and Everyone,
I fail to see where an ADRP benefits anyone, with the possible
exception
of certain elements of the legal profession.
Richard J. Sexton wrote:
http://stream.internet.com/
From this take the Cybersquatting link. The most interesting thing
was that both sides
Tony Rutkowski wrote:
At 12:51 PM 9/27/99 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The former was a draft, and is now buried in oblivion, while
the second is
the current (as today, 1999-09-27) statement of policy of the USG.
Roberto:
"UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Management of
37 matches
Mail list logo
