Ken: I was the one who did not believe in the selection process of ICANN's
board and who spoke, whenever I could, for membership and election. But I
also recognize that ICANN has to be built. The current board is composed of
people whom I respect. It has the support of the government, conditioned
I do not think we disagree. I certainly agree with Larry Lessig, and I did
read his book. We disagree on the timing. I am willing to be more patient,
and hope that people like you will continue to demand more accountability.
I did not conclude that all is lost, so long as I see some progress. The
At 10:55 AM 11/24/99 -0500, Tamar Frankel wrote:
I do not think we disagree. I certainly agree with Larry Lessig, and I did
read his book. We disagree on the timing. I am willing to be more patient,
and hope that people like you will continue to demand more accountability.
I did not conclude that
At 10:55 AM 11/24/99 , you wrote:
I did not conclude that all is lost, so long as I see some progress. The
alternatives scare me too. So that is where we disagree.
Hi Tamar,
What progress have you seen?
A larger board?
What realistic alternatives do you fear?
Consider that the whole big
The "myth of the online pervert" seems roughly analogous to me
to the "myth of internet instability" as a reason d'etre for ICANN.
by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A wave of significant legislation seeking to regulate electronic
commerce and culture is now before Congress, marking a
significant new era in
I did not conclude that all is lost, so long as I see some progress. The
alternatives scare me too. So that is where we disagree.
Hi Tamar,
What progress have you seen?
A larger board?
[...]
Some discussion of these matters would be useful.
Whayt he said. Along with:
1) If ICANN doesn't
BWGThe "myth of the online pervert" seems roughly analogous to me
to the "myth of internet instability" as a reason d'etre for ICANN.
by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A wave of significant legislation seeking to regulate electronic
commerce and culture is now before Congress, marking a
significant new era
your reply is helpful.
but as far as being scared by alternatives.(too).
I don't think I follow you here..
i don't see any aternatives to be scared by...except the MORASS that
lessig bemoans...
the very morass that allows the icanntes to do what they are doing
and get away
At 10:55 AM 11/24/99 -0500, Tamar Frankel wrote:
I do not think we disagree. I certainly agree with Larry Lessig, and I did
read his book. We disagree on the timing. I am willing to be more patient,
and hope that people like you will continue to demand more accountability.
I did not conclude
I just laughed when I read this, and some people may like it because it
shows a trend toward considering domain names to be owned by domain name
holders. But I fear it will reinforce the idea that you and your domain
name are "bescherrt" (i.e., there is one domain name divinely chosen for
you)
Tony and all,
A.M. Rutkowski wrote:
At 10:55 AM 11/24/99 , you wrote:
I did not conclude that all is lost, so long as I see some progress. The
alternatives scare me too. So that is where we disagree.
Hi Tamar,
What progress have you seen?
A larger board?
Not to mention a Board that
Path:
ns3.vrx.net!news2.best.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!colt.net!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed.online.be!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!server1.netnews.ja.net!pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk!not-for-mail
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Jackson)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: adns -
Richard and all,
Richard J. Sexton wrote:
I did not conclude that all is lost, so long as I see some progress. The
alternatives scare me too. So that is where we disagree.
Hi Tamar,
What progress have you seen?
A larger board?
[...]
Some discussion of these matters would be useful.
Andy and all,
Well yes it is funny in several ways, but also serious in some as well.
As you MAY?? know, there have already been US DIstrict court
rulings determining that DN's indeed property. Some of those rulings
have seen some press coverage. Many have not.
Andy Oram wrote:
I just
I must go, but will return in a few days and we can continue the
discussion. Thanks for responding.
Tamar
At 01:22 PM 11/24/99 -0800, you wrote:
Richard and all,
Richard J. Sexton wrote:
I did not conclude that all is lost, so long as I see some progress. The
alternatives scare me too. So
Dear Tony,
you wrote:
... a "good ICANN" is one that does nothing
or disappears. About the only exception, is the
introduction of new TLDs.
I have a great respect for your positions about
many themes related to the Internet and ICANN.
But I have to disagree with you about that the
best ICANN
Kathy and all,
Thank you for sharing this note with us, as I am sure it will be
helpful for some to get a idea anyway of how these meetings
were conducted and some ideas of what the ICANN membership
organization can or should be about.
In this light I have some comments and questions I
Javier and all,
You know Javier, there was once a child much like you liken
ICANN to be some 50 odd years ago. That child had defects,
although they mostly mental ones, much like ICANN's. His name
was Adolf Hitler...
So, what I am getting at here is that sometimes the cure, kills
the
THE BEST ICANN is the one that you, me, and
many other people is building around the whole
world. This ICANN is like a child that has been
born with huge, enourmous defects, imperfections,
limitations. But it is OUR little child.
Not me, I wasn't even in town that month. Roger Cochetti was
From: d3nnis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IFWP] ICANN is intended for...
Cc: Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think this is perhaps the most interesting dialog I have observed
since coming to the Cyberspace regime called ICANN.
It seems to me that Cyberspace is torn between the extremes that
Dennis, Javier and all,
d3nnis wrote:
Javier and Jeff --
I think this is perhaps the most interesting dialog I have observed
since coming to the Cyberspace regime called ICANN.
I don't believe I would want to characterize ICANN and most
especially it's (Initial?) Interim board and now
From: d3nnis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IFWP] ICANN is intended for...
In-reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeff Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED],
d3nnis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1";
22 matches
Mail list logo
