Re: [IFWP] Re: Kent's Rhetoric and Bombast - and ICANN the Scam..

2000-05-17 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Jeff Williams wrote: > As for Kent, well the bullshit flowith! Joe B. How about a > .GOD special domain for Kent and Songbird. I know you can come > up with something wholesome! >;) Send me the bill on the registration. songbird.god is taken. any other choices? or

[IFWP] Re: Kent's Rhetoric and Bombast - and ICANN the Scam..

2000-05-17 Thread Jeff Williams
John the Repoman and all, John, you have aptly captured in your own adept manner the scam that ICANN has become to anyone that has half a brain, and exercises it just a tad. >;) Maybe we should hang a label on it as "ICANN-ISCAM"? Has a ring to it doesn't it? >;) As for Kent, well the b

Re: [IFWP] RE: S.D.Dellheim Companies?

2000-05-17 Thread Dan Steinberg
ONly people who are reading this list now will know that (Or people who read enough of the archives to find this thread). Someone just surfing in at random stands a good chance of NOT knowing and getting the impression the list isn't a complete reflection of the message s. Come to think of it, i

Re: [IFWP] dot.god on internet news

2000-05-17 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
Yes - jeff - how true. Very accurate. I was actually surprised he quoted me verbatim with respect to "farting judges" - but was very glad he did. ICANN could learn from such honesty - could it not? Regards Joe Baptista On Wed, 17 May 2000, Jeff Williams wrote: > Joe and all, > > This is a

Re: [IFWP] RE: S.D.Dellheim Companies?

2000-05-17 Thread Richard J. Sexton
ok At 06:23 PM 5/17/00 -0700, you wrote: >>Doesn't seem that important. It's not like poeple can't >>figure out [deleted] means S.D.Dellheim Companies > >Not to belabor the point, but Richard, if you do it for one, you may have >to do it for othersand NO, there's no way for people new to this

Re: [IFWP] dot.god on internet news

2000-05-17 Thread Jeff Williams
Joe and all, This is a nice and truthful piece of journalism at least and at last. Nice work Joe. May God be with you! >;) !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > http://www.internetnews.com/wd-news/article/0,2171,10_364761,00.html > > Regards > Joe Baptista Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman I

Re: [IFWP] RE: S.D.Dellheim Companies?

2000-05-17 Thread Ellen Rony
>Doesn't seem that important. It's not like poeple can't >figure out [deleted] means S.D.Dellheim Companies Not to belabor the point, but Richard, if you do it for one, you may have to do it for othersand NO, there's no way for people new to this discussion to have a clue who [deleted] means.

Re: [IFWP] S.D.Dellheim Companies?

2000-05-17 Thread Ellen Rony
Richard, I think this is an inappropriate request. You can post that the company wanted to be deleted, but those archives are part of Internet history, NOT revisionist, years-down-the-line, second-thoughts history. Please don't cave under such requests and restore the name in the messages. It's

[IFWP] dot.god on internet news

2000-05-17 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
http://www.internetnews.com/wd-news/article/0,2171,10_364761,00.html Regards Joe Baptista

[IFWP] RE: S.D.Dellheim Companies?

2000-05-17 Thread Richard J. Sexton
Doesn't seem that important. It's not like poeple can't figure out [deleted] means S.D.Dellheim Companies At 04:30 PM 5/17/00 -0700, Roeland Meyer (E-mail) wrote: >Boy, it's a good thing that I pulled down my own copy . > >Not meaning to be too argumentative Richard, but wy did you give >in and w

Re: [IFWP] S.D.Dellheim Companies?

2000-05-17 Thread Jeff Williams
Richard and all, I did some time ago now, and told the guy to bugger off. Than hung up the phone on him and blocked his dial in number perminantly. Richard J. Sexton wrote: > I got a few phone calls and emails from this fellow asking me to > remove all references to his name from the PAB arc

[IFWP] S.D.Dellheim Companies?

2000-05-17 Thread Richard J. Sexton
I got a few phone calls and emails from this fellow asking me to remove all references to his name from the PAB archives that I maintain a mirror of on newdom.com. I really didn't like the idea of doing this, to my mind archived are either complete or they're not, but he was veryu polite, firm an

Re: [IFWP] Re: Fw: Your names council at work

2000-05-17 Thread Jeff Williams
Michael and all, I can't disagree with you proposed remedy here Michael. I for one appreciate you frankness in this regard. Michael Sondow wrote: > Jeff Williams wrote: > > > > DOn't forget Joe that Ken was elected illegitimately as the history > > of the DNSO clearly shows... > > The DNSO

Re: [IFWP] Re: Fw: Your names council at work

2000-05-17 Thread Michael Sondow
Jeff Williams wrote: > > DOn't forget Joe that Ken was elected illegitimately as the history > of the DNSO clearly shows... The DNSO is an invention of CORE and the CORE leadership. Mssrs. Stubbs, Crispin, Abril i Abril, Sola, and the the others from CORE who co-opted the DNSO with the ICANN B

Re: [IFWP] Re: Fw: Your names council at work

2000-05-17 Thread Jeff Williams
Joe and all, DOn't forget Joe that Ken was elected illegitimately as the history of the DNSO clearly shows... !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > Ken - your full of shit. Forgive me - but truth in advertising. Your a > names council exec - you should conduct yourself accordingly and not put > ICANN

Re: [IFWP] Were you consulted?

2000-05-17 Thread Christian . Ahlert
Hi, I am a member of the Western European Membership Implementation Task Force. I was not consulted! Andrew McLaughlin replied to my similar question: "The selection of the nominating & election committees was done by the Board. Under the election structure, anybody who can demonstrate a cer