> In this case I believe the distinction is moot since the ability of
> shareholders to file derivative suits (in most cases) allows them to *be* the
> corporation for these purposes. A very powerful weapon in the hands of the
> right attorney.
And a powerful weapon that ICANN has removed fro
Dan Steinberg wrote:
> In this case I believe the distinction is moot since the ability of
> shareholders to file derivative suits (in most cases) allows them to *be*
the
> corporation for these purposes. A very powerful weapon in the hands of the
> right attorney.
Right, and the shareholder bri
> Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>
>
>
> > I thought that as CEO he is accountable to his shareholders, not to the
> > Internet Community (not even to speak about the IFWP list).
>
> No, that's what Telage says when he threatens ICANN and the NTIA, but unless
> corporate law is fundamentally different
Craig McTaggart wrote:
>
> Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>
>
>
> > I thought that as CEO he is accountable to his
> shareholders, not to the
> > Internet Community (not even to speak about the IFWP list).
>
> No, that's what Telage says when he threatens ICANN and the
> NTIA, but unless
> corporat
Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> I thought that as CEO he is accountable to his shareholders, not to the
> Internet Community (not even to speak about the IFWP list).
No, that's what Telage says when he threatens ICANN and the NTIA, but unless
corporate law is fundamentally different in Virginia (or D
At 10:41 AM 9/15/99 , Gordon Cook wrote:
>yes of course from his position at NSI. he presented himself as someone
>who knew and cared about the Internet as well as about his shareholders.
Gordon,
I have no idea whether an agreement will be signed
or not. However, no matter how Jim Rutt feels
:47 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [IFWP] Jim Rutt Should Resign
> >
> >
> > Rutt in his Rutt report said he cared about the internet. That one
> > of his highest priorities was to preserve the freedom and
> > independence of the Internet.
> &g
Internet Community (not even to speak about the IFWP list).
>
> Regards
> Roberto
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gordon Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 14 September 1999 9:47 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [IFWP] Jim
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 September 1999 9:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [IFWP] Jim Rutt Should Resign
>
>
> Rutt in his Rutt report said he cared about the internet. That one
> of his highest priorities was to preserve the freedom and
> independence of the Inter
Rutt in his Rutt report said he cared about the internet. That one
of his highest priorities was to preserve the freedom and
independence of the Internet.
Today I heard from a source with primary knowledge that Pincus wasn't
lying.that NSI rather than fight ICANN will enable it by signing
10 matches
Mail list logo
