Syracuse, NY
November 9, 2000
The international method of resolving disputes over Internet domain names favors
trademark holders over those seeking to register an Internet site, according to a
study by researchers at Syracuse University's School of Information Studies. The study
was released N
FYI:
Original Message
Subject: News Blackout Creates Chaos
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 02:03:17 -0500
From: Jay Fenello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Fenello.com, Inc.
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.reform,alt
.politics.greens,a
At 08:10 AM 8/12/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Gordon Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Nick Patience wrote:
No I didn't, so don't attribute this to me. Gordon wrote the paragraph
starting "If they want a comment from me..."
All I said was that there was a comment facility on the ZD site and I was
sup
Gordon Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Nick Patience wrote:
>If they want a comment from me they can cut and paste jay fenellos
>first internet civil way item in the comment space, or they can have
>the following from an earlier private message this morning. As you
>know Nick, this issue is
If they want a comment from me they can cut and paste jay fenellos
first internet civil way item in the comment space, or they can have
the following from an earlier private message this morning. As you
know Nick, this issue is bloody complicated and not amenable to the
simplistic treatment
Wednesday, August 11, 1999, 8:59:38 AM, Mikki Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Gordon Cook - ignorant and illiterate fool.
>>Neurotic and obsessive.
>>'The only good ICANN is a dead ICANN'
>>Hey, that's clever.
> So much for cutting out the fighting amongst ourselves, eh?
Mikki,
Surely you
On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, A.M. Rutkowski wrote:
>
> >randy barret. ignorant fool
>
> Who is he? What gives him special
> insight or stature? (Other than some
> people agree or disagree with him. :-) )
Randy is a pretty clueful reporter who has been doing work for Interactive
Week and others fo
0)171 291 3900
>+44 (0)468 625546 Mobile
>+44 (0)171 291 3939 (Fax)
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: A.M. Rutkowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: 11 August 1999 16:53
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [IFWP] N
Luc and all,
Here is my original response in full again (Also see below):
" Luc, your contention here has SOME merit. There has been allot
of name calling false aspersions thrown around, and other nonproductive
comments made to be sure. But you ore only half right in this
contention. Many o
Luc and all,
Well Luc, in all honesty, that is exactly what the writer is displaying,
ignorance... I know this seems denigrating, and I am sure that Gordon
Cook did not intend it that way. But not doing your homework is not
a valid excuse for the article that he/she wrote or writes. Hence
Go
Jay Luc and all,
Luc, your contention here has SOME merit. There has been allot
of name calling false aspersions thrown around, and other nonproductive
comments made to be sure. But you ore only half right in this
contention. Many on the various lists have made many suggestions
good and bad.
>I thought it was a brilliant and necessary piece. Telling everyone a bit of
>home truth.
>Tony's response is typical of the arrogant NSI approach: whatever we do,
>we're always right, we never made a mistake.
Hi Ivan,
Bad day? Do you communicate with another "Tony?"
Here is what I said:
>Wh
There is a comment option on the site, I'm surprised it's still empty :)
http://www.zdnet.com/tlkbck/comment/321/0,7091,68185-new,00.html
At 11:55 AM 8/11/99 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>At 11:27 AM 8/11/99 , Gordon Cook wrote:
>>>http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/stories/news/0,4164,2311649,00.html
>>
>>
At 12:14 PM 8/11/99 , Luc Hatlestad wrote:
>I'm not sure how I got included on this list, but I assume it was because
>of the story I wrote about NSI. Since I'm here, an observation: From what
>I've seen so far, you guys are quite good at name calling but haven't
>offered up much in the way of r
>Gordon Cook - ignorant and illiterate fool.
>Neurotic and obsessive.
>'The only good ICANN is a dead ICANN'
>Hey, that's clever.
So much for cutting out the fighting amongst ourselves, eh?
At 11:27 AM 8/11/99 , Gordon Cook wrote:
>>http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/stories/news/0,4164,2311649,00.html
>
>randy barret. ignorant fool
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/comment/0,5859,2298770,00.html
Ziff/Davis, the publisher of Inter@ctive Week,
PC Week, Sm@rt Reseller, and a slew
Gordon Cook - ignorant and illiterate fool.
Neurotic and obsessive.
'The only good ICANN is a dead ICANN'
Hey, that's clever.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 11 August 1999 16:27
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
om
180-182 Tottenham Court Road
London, W1P 9LE
+44 (0)171 291 3900
+44 (0)468 625546 Mobile
+44 (0)171 291 3939 (Fax)
> -Original Message-
> From: A.M. Rutkowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 11 August 1999 16:53
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, A.M. Rutkowski wrote:
>
> >randy barret. ignorant fool
>
> Who is he? What gives him special
> insight or stature? (Other than some
> people agree or disagree with him. :-) )
Who is he? He's a member of the press who has just given everyone here a
black eye. He's a
>randy barret. ignorant fool
Who is he? What gives him special
insight or stature? (Other than some
people agree or disagree with him. :-) )
cheers,
--tony
>http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/stories/news/0,4164,2311649,00.html
randy barret. ignorant fool
The COOK Report on InternetIndex to seven years of the COOK Report
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA http://cookrepo
In four years of involvement, this is the best thing I've ever read. I can't
resist sending it in full so we all get to read it :-)
http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/stories/news/0,4164,2311649,00.html
Enough already!
By Randy Barrett
I'm just plain sick of the Domain Name System dispute.
It's an i
http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/stories/news/0,4164,2311649,00.html
BWG DISPUTES ICANNS DOMAIN NAME COMPETITION CLAIMS
(Boston, April 23, 1999) The Boston Working Group (BWG) today
challenged ICANN's claim that it had opened up the domain name
registration market to competition. The group also criticized
the
contract ICANN has imposed upon its registrars, noting
24 matches
Mail list logo
