> Can u tell me is it brawser depended or css does not get reflected in Mozilla
> or Mozilla Firefox ?
>
> I m sending u my html file and css file.
Hi Nisha,
The issue is using pixels for font sizing. IE does not support text resizing
on pixel- based font sizes. Better to use percents or ems
Hi All,
I m facing
this problem—
Run the application in Internet Explorer and then
increase the text size,
the application is not affected by the size change.
Now run the application in Mozilla or Mozilla Firefox
and then increase
the text size, the application is aff
we are wating for it :)
Neo
On 7/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks everyone for your input. That clarifies thing for me now. I havedeveloped a pretty cool form layout which I really like and it works well
across all browsers I have tested with. Plus it is built on ems,
there is a disccussion next door to you
[WSG] target=_blank
there u could find this link
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/popup_window_with_no_extra_markup.asp
hope its helpfull
NeoSwf
On 7/25/06, Donna Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought this was a very neat solution (without popup
On 7/25/06, TuteC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Excellent, I think this is what I was searching...
TuteC, what is the advantge of this approuch?
it only helps when u open a new window for a known page, so u dont have to write the url over and over.
but if u change the URL that u wish to open, u wil
I thought this was a very neat solution (without popups):
http://juicystudio.com/article/form-help-without-popups.html
I just triple-bookmarked that (a habit when i consider something
important). very neat and i like the fact that the "help" icon toggles
with "enter key", all of it is very ke
Ian Pouncey wrote:
TuteC wrote:
Hello everyone. I have a web page that I use as a public favorites. I
have around a hundred different links to outside sites, and I use the
target=blank for each one. I searched at W3schools for a way to making
all the links in the page target=blank with CSS but
Excellent, I think this is what I was searching... cause it´s the
function of the site: to open links in new windows while the
"favorites" page never goes until you want to. I know it is a personal
preference... :-)
Thank you all very much;
Eugenio.
On 7/24/06, Thierry Koblentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TuteC wrote:
> Hello everyone. I have a web page that I use as a public favorites. I
> have around a hundred different links to outside sites, and I use the
> target=blank for each one. I searched at W3schools for a way to
> making all the links in the page target=blank with CSS but couldn´t
> find
Steve Eades wrote:
Hi, I have been playing with Spiffy Corners @
http://www.spiffycorners.com/ for an Intranet but the Spiffy assures
that it is "Anti-aliased rounded corners using pure CSS. No Images. No
Javascript. No fluff." I can assume you that it is very easy to
implement and scalable.
TuteC wrote:
Hello everyone. I have a web page that I use as a public favorites. I
have around a hundred different links to outside sites, and I use the
target=blank for each one. I searched at W3schools for a way to making
all the links in the page target=blank with CSS but couldn´t find one.
Hi, I have been playing with Spiffy Corners @ http://www.spiffycorners.com/ for an Intranet but the Spiffy assures that it is "Anti-aliased rounded corners using pure CSS. No Images. No _javascript_. No fluff." I can assume you that it is very easy to implement and scalable. Works on Macs too.
C
Hello everyone. I have a web page that I use as a public favorites. I have around a hundred different links to outside sites, and I use the target=blank for each one. I searched at W3schools for a way to making all the links in the page target=blank with CSS but couldn´t find one. Is just that in a
Thanks everyone for your input. That clarifies thing for me now. I have
developed a pretty cool form layout which I really like and it works well
across all browsers I have tested with. Plus it is built on ems, so it zooms
too. Once I get it all rock solid I will post a link and get some feedbac
IAN CHAMBERLAIN wrote:
I need
to find an accessible way to deliver a small number of pop-ups on a CSS
+ XMTML strict E-commerce site, offering help as required to some
complex forms that can't be fixed at the moment.
I thought this was a very neat solution (without popups):
http://juicystudio
Yes, and that´s my problem: sometimes I finish a standards compliant website but it doesn´t function as I want in IE6, and 90% of my visitors uses it. Some people doesn´t like the idea of using "dirty" sheets because it´s not standards compliant, but if my visitors can´t see the site as I designed
I hope someone out there can help.
It goes without saying that pop-ups are a rather
nasty thing, but I need to find an accessible way to deliver a small number of
pop-ups on a CSS + XMTML strict E-commerce site, offering help as required to
some complex forms that can't be fixed at the mom
On 7/21/06 9:08 PM, "Steve Olive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can use the "target" attribute in XHTML, just not with Strict Doctypes,
> and none of the postings have mentioned doctype or whether this is being
> served as application/xhtml+xml or text/html.
>
> Ted and Thierry's script is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None of these solutions have much to do with semantics, and none of them
appear to be fool-proof.
If at all possible, stick with the standards - CSS3 includes a
declaration for rounded corners, which has been supported by Mozilla for
a long time.
Mike
-
Good idea
Hi Mike,
I absolutely agree.
Janos
On 7/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
None of these solutions have much to do with semantics, and none of them
appear to be fool-proof.
If at all possible, stick with the standards - CSS3 includes a
declaration for rounded corners, which h
I think that JavaScript has more need of this notation than other languages,
precisely because of the weak typing. However, those who try and use the same
notation rules for say Java as for JavaScript are going to have trouble. I find
objNAME arrNAME etc useful, and things like txtNAME a
Just be aware that Mac/IE follows the CSS 2.0 spec,
and will make any floated block elements fill the
available horizontal space. This can seriously break
your layout in Mac/IE.
One way to address this is to hide the "display:
block" and "float: left" rules from Mac/IE, and tell
it to simply "dis
On 7/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My understanding is that you must declaire a width for floated block level
elements (i.e. div, p, ul etc.) But is this the same for inline elements?
You don't HAVE to declare a width for floated elements.
A floated element with no width
Nathan,
on Monday, July 24, 2006 at 13:48 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote:
> My understanding is that you must declaire a width for floated block level
> elements (i.e. div, p, ul etc.) But is this the same for inline elements?
> Specificaly, I want to float an input feild and its associated labl
None of these solutions have much to do with semantics, and none of them
appear to be fool-proof.
If at all possible, stick with the standards - CSS3 includes a
declaration for rounded corners, which has been supported by Mozilla for
a long time.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: listd
I think that JavaScript has more need of this notation than other languages,
precisely because of the weak typing. However, those who try and use the same
notation rules for say Java as for JavaScript are going to have trouble. I find
objNAME arrNAME etc useful, and things like txtNAME an
Hi,
My understanding is that you must declaire a width for floated block level
elements (i.e. div, p, ul etc.) But is this the same for inline elements?
Specificaly, I want to float an input feild and its associated lable, but I
DONT want to give a width (to allow for the form to be liquid). F
I disagree with Patrick's assessment on several points:
10.2 - Some user agents such as Lynx linearise the page but do not support
elements so it is still important to correctly position the labels.
1.5 - Some users are not able to use image maps for a variety of reasons so
I would always provid
http://www.cmsmatrix.org/ is an excellent CMS comparison site - it
lets you define your own criteria, and contrast several cms-es at
once.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia.html
>
> http://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence/
>
> may be worth a look as well
Lindsay Evans wrote:
I'm in the process of defining accessibility guidelines for a new
site, and am thinking it would be helpful to eliminate certain WCAG
checkpoints that are no longer relevant and could possibly lead to
usability problems if followed to the letter
Here are my thoughts on whi
Hi all,
I'm in the process of defining accessibility guidelines for a new
site, and am thinking it would be helpful to eliminate certain WCAG
checkpoints that are no longer relevant and could possibly lead to
usability problems if followed to the letter - eg. "10.4 Until user
agents handle empty
31 matches
Mail list logo
