Re: [WSG] i want my svg

Matthew Cruickshank wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: would you look at the image now with css constraints /**/ out? a year ago i put up a svg file and set the width to 100% and the file sized to the window regardless of resolution. this one doesn't seem to do that. what i read the other nigh

RE: [WSG] i want my svg

> opera 9.01 is the only browser to render the page properly. in my book, > that doesn't speak very highly of the beloved firefox. maybe, just > maybe, opera has taken over as "the" standards compliant browser. Actually, Opera 9 has passed the Acid2 test. Firefox has not. Just thought I'd poi

RE: [WSG] Safari Rendering on Windows / MacPro

I agree - about the only reason I ever fire up Safari (for testing) is to check whether I have got a drop-shadow correct. Mike > -Original Message- > From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dani > Nordin | 401.787.5178 > Sent: Wednesday, August 09,

Re: [WSG] Safari Rendering on Windows / MacPro

As a PC/Mac (primarily Mac) user, I've also found this to be true. Safari has had a tendency to look fine no matter what I've thrown at it; the one that tends to break is IE for Windows. Cheers, Dani ~~ Dani Nordin the zen kitchen Graphic and web design with a touch of gre

[WSG] getting javascript as a ajx response

Hi , I want to change one image in my web site dynamically after 5 sec using ajax. I m using rico for this. The problem is that , the image name should be constructed dynamically( in javascript). So my ajax response xml file should look like document.write('

Re: [WSG] IE7 standards support very bad according to some

Tom Livingston wrote: On 8/9/06 6:36 AM, "Nick Fitzsimons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm not sure what he's trying to achieve with markup like: Maybe it's me. Is the issue was that he had this empty UL sitting around in his code or is there something wrong with this that I am too un-caffi

Re: [WSG] IE7 standards support very bad according to some

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: lack of craftsmanship. haha..great insight :-) Did you comment to his blog? Maarten No, because one has to register to comment. I don't really have time to give my details to some random guy on the net, just so I can insult his work :-) Anyway, there are already

Re: [WSG] IE7 standards support very bad according to some

Quoting Nick Fitzsimons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Looks to me like he's blaming ie for his design problems. On www.newscloud.com there is 226 errors returned by the validator. Scrollbars at 800px in all browsers, image distortion and o

Re: [WSG] IE7 standards support very bad according to some

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Looks to me like he's blaming ie for his design problems. On www.newscloud.com there is 226 errors returned by the validator. Scrollbars at 800px in all browsers, image distortion and odd text sizes... might some of those things

Re: [WSG] IE7 standards support very bad according to some

Thanks for all the responses so far Rene, Gunlaug, Bruce and Terrence, I have learned alot already from this :-) Maarten Quoting Rene Saarsoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I was under the impression that IE 7's standards support was much improved, but this article, http://www.idealog.us/2006/08/mic

Re: [WSG] IE7 standards support very bad according to some

I was under the impression that IE 7's standards support was much improved, but this article, http://www.idealog.us/2006/08/microsoft_drops.html, and the Paul Thurrot article it links to both think it is bad. On one side, yes, the CSS support in IE 7 has improved quite a bit - fixes for most

Re: [WSG] i want my svg

On Aug 9, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Matthew Cruickshank wrote: Here's some versions with SVG's width/height removed... http://holloway.co.nz/wellypug/svg/svg-test1a.html http://holloway.co.nz/wellypug/svg/svg-test1b.html In test1a the SVG now scales based on CSS constraints which are a fixed pixel

Re: [WSG] i want my svg

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: would you look at the image now with css constraints /**/ out? a year ago i put up a svg file and set the width to 100% and the file sized to the window regardless of resolution. this one doesn't seem to do that. what i read the other night on the w3c site on svg is

Re: [WSG] IE7 standards support very bad according to some

Bruce wrote: Looks to me like he's blaming ie for his design problems. On www.newscloud.com there is 226 errors returned by the validator. Scrollbars at 800px in all browsers, image distortion and odd text sizes... Since I always add a bit of user-preference on any site (minimum font size = 1

Re: [WSG] IE7 standards support very bad according to some

Quoting Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Looks to me like he's blaming ie for his design problems. On www.newscloud.com there is 226 errors returned by the validator. Scrollbars at 800px in all browsers, image distortion and odd text sizes... might some of those things not be because of IE(6/7) wo

Re: [WSG] IE7 standards support very bad according to some

Looks to me like he's blaming ie for his design problems. On www.newscloud.com there is 226 errors returned by the validator. Scrollbars at 800px in all browsers, image distortion and odd text sizes... Bruce Prochnau bkdesign - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent:

Re: [WSG] IE7 standards support very bad according to some

On 9/08/2006, at 7:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was under the impression that IE 7's standards support was much improved. What are the experiences of folks on this list? It's way better than IE6... but I'm going to kick it into quirks mode so I can cover most of the last 4 iterations o

Re: [WSG] Least ugly way to achieve multiple backgrounds

At 11:11 PM 8/8/2006, Pamela Jones wrote: Thanks for your reply, Paul. I'm not sure I understand what you mean. My problem is not so much with the visibility, stacking them in the right order will work, it's more a matter of I don't know which elements / DIVs to attach them to because you can't

[WSG] IE7 standards support very bad according to some

hi, I was under the impression that IE 7's standards support was much improved, but this article, http://www.idealog.us/2006/08/microsoft_drops.html, and the Paul Thurrot article it links to both think it is bad. What are the experiences of folks on this list? cheers, Maarten