Mobile: +91 9820766147
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Swabey
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 1:49 PM
To: WSG Mailing List
Subject: [WSG] Pixel to EM conversion
Hi all
I came across a very neat, and immensely useful tool
Thank you, but there seems to be more to it than that. I've put width:220px; on #sidebar and margin-right:220px; on #content, but the design breaks badly. I think I need to set some % or em units on the header and menu, but I don't quite understand how to. The header has a middle gif that repeats
morten fjellman wrote:
Thank you, but there seems to be more to it than that. I've put
width:220px; on #sidebar and margin-right:220px; on #content, but the
design breaks badly. I think I need to set some % or em units on the
header and menu, but I don't quite understand how to. The header
Outstanding! :)Thanks a lot! Can I trouble you for an explanation on how to get the menu to compress as well? You don't have to set up the code, but I would be gratefull for a push in the right direction.Regards
MortenOn 4/27/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
morten fjellman wrote: Thank
morten fjellman wrote:
Outstanding! :) Thanks a lot! Can I trouble you for an explanation on
how to get the menu to compress as well? You don't have to set up
the code, but I would be gratefull for a push in the right direction.
Easier to push with a bit of CSS-code :-)
Browsers like it
I thought I had a good handle on things...until I met you. Thank you .)That hit spot!*imponert!*C.KOn 4/27/06, Gunlaug Sørtun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:morten fjellman wrote:
Outstanding! :) Thanks a lot! Can I trouble you for an explanation onhow to get the menu to compress as well? You don't
Thank you for your input, but all issues have been resolved so there is no need for further assistance.Thanks anyway :)RegardsMortenOn 4/27/06,
Joseph R. B. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All opinions on your design decisions aside,this is the easiest way todo what you are trying to do.1. wrap
Felix Miata wrote:
Why not use text relative widths? Make the left 36em wide and the
right 12em wide. That's a fluid design, just what the web was
designed to be. Everyone with a reasonably sized window will see the
same line lengths, regardless of their default text size, like here:
irony-warning
Obviously you guys are not up on the latest... Spacer gifs. You can
add them into each table cell and force the cell to any width. I'm
thinking of writing a tutorial on it...
Never mind that... we're to busy adding the even more unobtrusive
spacer divs to our XHTML, so we can
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
irony-warning
Never mind that... we're to busy adding the even more unobtrusive
spacer divs to our XHTML, so we can replicate tables with divs - even
when tables are the right thing for the job. Much more semantic.
Wow,
What are you guys thinking!?
You have built
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En
nombre de morten fjellman
Enviado el: Miércoles, 26 de Abril
de 2006 07:02 p.m.
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Asunto: [WSG] Pixel to Em
conversion.
Hi,
I'm trying to get this layout to work with min- and max-width. The max-width
needs to be 880px wide and the min-width must
morten fjellman wrote:
I'm trying to get this layout to work with min- and max-width. The
max-width needs to be 880px wide and the min-width must be 680px. I have
made the header and menu in such a way that they can be compressed (to a
point), but I can't seem to figure out how to set the
Susie Gardner-Brown wrote:
Back in the olden days of table layouts, you’d have the right col (td)
at 220px, and the rest at 100%!
Actually, you wouldn't. You'd have the *table* set to 100%, and the left
column to 220px.
--
Patrick H. Lauke
-Original Message-
From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Susie Gardner-Brown wrote:
Back in the olden days of table layouts, youd have the
right col (td)
at 220px, and the rest at 100%!
Actually, you wouldn't. You'd have the *table* set to 100%,
and the left
column to
I think I understand what you are saying and i actually used this tutorial to help me with a similar problem (may or may not help)http://css.maxdesign.com.au/floatutorial/tutorial0816.htm
On 4/27/06, Lachlan Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
morten fjellman wrote: I'm trying to get this layout to
take too long to load for ppl with a slow modem among other reasons why you wouldnt do thatOn 4/27/06, Herrod, Lisa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:-Original Message-
From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Susie Gardner-Brown wrote: Back in the olden days of table layouts, you'd
Herrod, Lisa wrote:
Surely you'd just insert the concept design as one big img and ensure the
alt was sufficiently descriptive...?
Nah, you'd chop up the big image into 30+ small images because, you
know, the small files load faster than the single big image (which is
disputed anyway). And
Actually, you wouldn't. You'd have the *table* set to 100%,
and the left
column to 220px.
Surely you'd just insert the concept design as one big img and ensure the
alt was sufficiently descriptive...?
Obviously you guys are not up on the latest... Spacer gifs. You can add them
into
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:37 pm, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Herrod, Lisa wrote:
From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can use the alt tag for keyword stuffing to help boost your search
engine rankings. Also remember to use alt=spacer for spacer gifs so
that screen readers can
Im one of the ppl tat still have a 56k modem. Its impossible for me to get broadband were I live and tat is in Perth Oz, let alone in the country areas.On 4/27/06,
Mark Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Germ wrote:
take too long to load for ppl with a slow modem among other reasons why you wouldnt
also don't have cable TV available here.
- Original Message -
From:
Germ
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 10:10
PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Pixel to Em
conversion.
Im one of the ppl tat still have a 56k modem. Its impossible
for me to get
Title: Re: [WSG] Pixel to Em conversion.
On 27/4/06 1:10 PM, Germ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im one of the ppl tat still have a 56k modem. Its impossible for me to get broadband were I live and tat is in Perth Oz, let alone in the country areas.
Looks like your keyboard might be missing the h
OK, I'm getting a little worried here. Some of the recent posts have used a
relatively new concept called irony. For those who haven't heard of this,
here is a brief description:
Irony is a form of speech in which the real meaning is concealed or
contradicted by the words used. Irony involves the
Russ,I always thought irony was like goldy and silvery. Thanks for the clarification.SteveOn 27/04/06, russ - maxdesign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:OK, I'm getting a little worried here. Some of the recent posts have used a
relatively new concept called irony. For those who haven't heard of this,here
russ - maxdesign wrote:
Irony is a form of speech in which the real meaning is concealed or
contradicted by the words used. Irony involves the perception that things
are not what they are said to be or what they seem.
So irony isn't a a black fly in your Chardonnay or a traffic jam when
russ - maxdesign wrote:
OK, I'm getting a little worried here. Some of the recent posts have used a
relatively new concept called irony.
I thought it was sarcasm.
Irony is a form of speech in which the real meaning is concealed or
contradicted by the words used. Irony involves the perception
From: Lachlan Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And I thought irony was what my mum does to get the wrinkles out of my
clothes. :-)
yes, just before she puts them in the 'Cupboardy'
:)
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
27 matches
Mail list logo
