I use Wine fortnightly development version from WineHQ in Ubuntu Xenial.
This is a package called winehq-devel from their PPA.
Trouble is, when I compile latest LMMS from git, cmake doesn't recognise
the Wine development headers as being present.
How do I point cmake at the Wine headers? Is there
saving even a single time is not a good idea, ever.
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:13 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>>
>> Unlikely, unfortunately. Sorry :-(
>>
>> However, there is a useful tick-box: Edit -> Settings ->
>> lightning-bolt -> Enable auto-save featur
Unlikely, unfortunately. Sorry :-(
However, there is a useful tick-box: Edit -> Settings ->
lightning-bolt -> Enable auto-save feature - so if LMMS crashes, then
next time it opens you will have a recovered copy of your track to
save immediately :-)
On 26 June 2016 at 22:09, Benton Warner wrote:
LMMS has a fast limiter you can put on FX channel 0, and I frequently
do. Or do you mean something else? (A more complex fast limiter?)
On 18 June 2015 at 13:49, musikbear wrote:
> I have previously said, that lmms is more 'quiet' than the other DAWs out
> there.
> DAWs like fls is more 'in your
e 2015 at 23:30, Tobiasz Karoń wrote:
> That might be very cool. I don't know the internal workings of Audacity's
> EQ, but we already have wavetable hand-drawing widget, right?
>
> ---
> Tobiasz Karoń
> http://soundcloud.com/unfa
>
> On 7 Jun 2015 19:46, "Davi
ml
- d.
On 7 June 2015 at 17:28, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> @Dave,
>
> Does @curlymorphic's EQ do the job?
>
> Per: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/1376#issuecomment-66907732
>
> - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
>
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 12:20 PM, David Gerard wrote
I EQ every track so I can do the mixing in LMMS. But doing it with the
knobs is a goshdarn nuisance.
What I would really like: draw-your-graph EQ, like in Audacity
(Generate->Equalization).
I'd say use theirs, except they're GTK+ not Qt ... Is there a GTK+
open source project with such a widget t
yeah, that's trademark, not copyright. How lawyered-up is LMMS? (my
guess: not very.)
On 28 May 2015 at 22:30, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
>> This is not technically illegal
>
> Yeah, I'm not sure about that. They claiming to offer one thing and giving
> you something else. This bait and switch is
What they've been doing with many projects is taking the binaries and
putting them up under the open source licence ... with adware in the
downloader. This is not technically illegal, just incredibly sleazy.
On 28 May 2015 at 21:58, Spekular R wrote:
> Wouldn't it be safer to completely remove LM
blaming sourceforge for this, we don't know that for sure,
>> so be careful to blame them for this without knowing all of the information.
>>
>> -Tres
>>
>> - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
>>
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:33 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>
https://plus.google.com/+gimp/posts/cxhB1PScFpe
They just took the GIMP for Windows project, locked out the maintainer
and started serving a malwared .exe.
Nonapology for malware:
https://sourceforge.net/blog/gimp-win-project-wasnt-hijacked-just-abandoned/
I see LMMS has all .exe files off there
occhiaro wrote:
> @David,
>
> Thanks for sharing!
>
> - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 3:37 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>>
>> ... after many years of LMMS, including compiling and bug reporting.
>> https://soundcloud.com/diva-rose
>&
... after many years of LMMS, including compiling and bug reporting.
https://soundcloud.com/diva-rose
Mostly SF2 with Fluidsynth sound font and ZynAddSubFx.
- d.
--
One dashboard for servers and applications across Phys
Audacity is ridiculously easy to use. To the point that, the first
time I had occasion to use it, I went from "sudo apt-get install
audacity" to finished product[1] in a couple of hours. I sorta went
"HOLY SHIT it's the four-track we REALLY WANTED MORE THAN ANYTHING in
the 1990s." You know, the 199
On 28 January 2015 at 23:44, Amadeus Folego wrote:
> If there are compelling reasons they'll move.
> Wouldn't you prefer starting a project on LMMS 2.0 if it has LV2
> support? No crashes? A lot of usability improvements? Improved midi
> capabilities? Export individual FX Channels? Etc...
If yo
On 28 January 2015 at 22:58, Phil (list) wrote:
> Not yet having an understanding of what sort of cruft is involved, I
> have no idea if the effort involved in doing this is worth it. But
> dropping compatibility for existing work seems extreme.
Just picture the FB page when 2.0 is released a
Is there anything that can be done to avert the future where none of
our files work any more?
(I note your original plan would also mean the entire contents of the
LSP won't work any more.)
On 26 December 2014 at 21:32, Vesa wrote:
> So I feel like I have to document the changes so that other de
On 11 December 2014 at 13:55, Tres Finocchiaro
wrote:
> If you can reproduce your problem, please file a bug report. There may also
> be some issues that are XP only that you are suffering from. If you can set
> up an Ubuntu VM and recreate your crash in Wine, that generally has a usable
> back
On 28 November 2014 at 18:49, Dave French wrote:
> I am thinking of developing a parametric eq, simular in use to the calf 8
> band eq. With a spectrum analizer showing before and after displays.
One that shows the resulting curve? YES PLEASE!
- d.
---
OH YES PLEASE!!
This might be one of the most-requested features. I found mailing list
requests back to 2009 ...
LMMS can specify things you can't specify in MIDI, but not many of
them. So in an ideal world (once we have something it can be
iteratively improved), this could become a pretty good e
I'm not sure I understand the other options ... I've only just started
using automation much at all.
On 20 November 2014 20:25, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
> This is where Rob Kudla and David Gerard opinions would be great, no? :) For
> me it is the same.
>
>
> diiz wrote
&g
Getting LMMS files added to the Archive Team File Formats wiki. .mmp
is just XML, I'm presuming .mmpz is the same thing compressed ... but
what compression is it? It doesn't seem to be ordinary gzip.
- d.
--
Download BIR
'Cos someone would have to sit down and write the exporters.
(We still don't even have a direct MIDI export.)
On 19 November 2014 13:58, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Here is some probably crazy food for though. If there is potential for mmp
> and mmpz being dropped. Why dont we allow users to expo
On 19 November 2014 04:27, Vesa wrote:
> If we're going to add any compat code for 1.x projects, that should be
> done as an import plugin. That way we can confine any legacy code into a
> neat little box that doesn't clutter the rest of the codebase.
Yes, that's reasonable. It could even get
On 18 November 2014 22:19, Rob Kudla wrote:
> On 11/18/2014 02:23 PM, Vesa wrote:
>> Well, if you have old projects, you'll just have to finish them with 1.1
>> or 1.2 and render them to wavs. Then publish them, forget about it, and
>> make new music with 2.0.
> If this is the current developmen
On 18 November 2014 21:43, Vesa wrote:
> Well, there are ways to export MIDI out of LMMS. You can route the MIDI
> out from LMMS into some kind of MIDI sequencer, set it on record, and
> then save the MIDI file. Then import the resulting MIDI files to 2.0.
Is there a written procedure to do thi
I mean, the LMMS 1 userbase is trivial, and perhaps there's a much
bigger one that LMMS 2 thinks it can net.
On 18 November 2014 21:42, David Gerard wrote:
> Yes. I'm afraid I'm now asking around friends for software that may be
> proprietary, but has a track record of
Yes. I'm afraid I'm now asking around friends for software that may be
proprietary, but has a track record of caring about backward
compatibility - since LMMS 1 doesn't have export for data [*] and I'm
going to have to reprogram everything anyway.
[*] It's XML, I could write some XSLT! To get eve
Um ... so from the user viewpoint, LMMS 2 will be a completely
different project from LMMS 1?
(I'm not questioning your rationale, but I *am* thinking in terms of
how to get my music out.)
On 18 November 2014 18:38, Vesa wrote:
> On 11/18/2014 08:07 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> Rig
to list as well
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Gerard
Date: 18 November 2014 18:07
Subject: Re: [LMMS-devel] Moving on...
To: Vesa
On 18 November 2014 15:35, Vesa wrote:
> On 11/18/2014 04:39 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> btw - just how far back will compati
Have we got a dev blog about this sort of thing? Or perhaps a wiki page.
On 16 November 2014 09:41, Vesa wrote:
> Since one contributor recently asked about signals and slots, I thought
> it'd be good to write a bit about them.
>
> The Qt documentation already explains them pretty extensively, so
Yeah. With Windows, drivers come on disk and sometimes they work and
sometimes they don't.
With Linux, either (a) the drivers are there and everything is lovely!
or (b) you're out of luck.
Ubuntu lets you put on some proprietary drivers, but they're not going
to be persistent with the live versio
Basically - we cannot *possibly* be the first project to have this problem.
Therefore, there should be examples (successful and unsuccessful) we
can look to.
On 12 November 2014 13:55, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
>> > What country, should be the first thing to determine. Here i think the
>> > questi
At this point, I think the problems are well beyond LMMS ... first hit
a general Ubuntu board (askubuntu is the official one, and they're a
very helpful bunch), and once you have a well-behaving system, then
try building LMMS on it and things should go smoothly :-)
(I routinely build LMMS on Xubun
Yeah, we'd have to think about a legal entity to associate ourselves
with and handle the money. (Again, should we be so lucky :-D )
On 11 November 2014 14:53, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
>> Getting too much money should not be a problem. These money can be put to
>> a more long-term relationship with
[reincluding dev list]
Yeah. After a while you just need to install the requisite packages by
hand, try again, install another, repeat ... Eventually you get them
all!
On 11 November 2014 13:41, William Karlsson wrote:
> When I tried, (both the automatic and manual ones) it threw quite a bit of
Did you install the build-deps?
On 11 November 2014 12:49, Spekular R wrote:
> I recently decided to try to build LMMS on a copy of Ubuntu I installed on a
> memory stick, and when I run "cmake .. -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../target", I
> get a bunch of errors. Here are the errors I get:
> -- The C
On 10 November 2014 18:00, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> We have to be careful too... when the FOSS community sees we are doing a
> crowdfunding, we'll likely get inundated with tens or hundreds of thousands
> of dollars in donations when all we really want is enough for a single
> developer for a sm
aro wrote:
> At a glance, they seem quite comparable. Thanks kindly for the benchmark
> results.
>
> - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
>
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 5:55 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>>
>> So I finally got around to doing this. Here is today's master, plotte
+1 YES PLEASE
On 4 November 2014 20:45, Vesa wrote:
> So I was talking with some musicians today and a subject came up:
> relative automations. Particularly, how almost DAW offers this simple
> feature that would be very useful and practical in almost any DAW.
>
> The idea is, that you could crea
No time before the weekend, but I will do then!
On 22 October 2014 13:18, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> I've been busy with the lmms.io repo, terribly sorry for lack of involvement
> on this one. I've been following the chain of emails, just short on time
> this month.
>
> - tres.finocchi...@gmail.c
or
> not. Simply right click on a window hearder and choose stay on top.
>
>
> David Gerard-2 wrote
>> Yes, I mean that I want it to stay on top :-) I'm using LMMS on a
>> laptop, not a 24" screen.
>>
>> On 21 October 2014 16:32, Stian Jørgensrud <
>
&
ou close it... I
> don't see any other logic that would work here, unless you want to take away
> the ability to close it while marked as check up. Or did you just mean that
> it automatically should have on-top ability?
>
>
> David Gerard-2 wrote
>> Some would really ben
On 21 October 2014 11:50, musikbear wrote:
> I wonder if 'Stay-up' should be /default/ behavior?
> I find myself constantly bringing a controller, preset, FX- and other
> small-forms up, and then next to emediatly 'loosing' them again, when i
> click in song-editor. Because of that, i would like
On 19 October 2014 14:14, Vesa wrote:
> Idea:>
> - Project files (mmpz, mmp) get saved under "projects" as they are now
> - Rendered audio (wav, ogg) get saved under another directory, because
> it's kind of annoying to mix them all together
> - Configurable in prefs, so people who want to preser
On 4 October 2014 09:01, Vesa wrote:
> With per-track automations, it would be as easy as just connecting the
> track and bam, all patterns connected. One more entry on the pros-list.
>From a usability standpoint, this is a no-brainer IMO...
+1
Could we have multiple independent automations p
On 1 October 2014 21:35, Vesa wrote:
> So, an EQ in a separate tab. There's still problems there...
> For instance: what point in the chain would the EQ be in? Would it be
> before the rest of the FX chain or after it? What if you need it the
> other way around? If you have to enable the EQ anywa
On 3 September 2014 03:06, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> STOP USING SENDSPACE. DONT USE IT.
> This is the garbage that people get when they click your links:
> http://i.imgur.com/2N79I4n.png
That's ... nasty.
/me goes to tell everyone everywhere not to go near Sendspace
- d.
-
Your planned cull will break stuff and it's entirely unclear how doing
that will help LMMS.
On 26 August 2014 14:56, Ian Sannar wrote:
> The preset still needs a bit of work.
>
> @musikbear
> But Google has forms, which we could use.
> Find the top 100 or so used presets, and keep those included.
getting long in
>> the tooth anyway.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:48 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>>>
>>> I like all the presets in Zyn, but it would be nice if others got
>>> love. Perhaps the authors could prepare a few presets that serve as
&g
I like all the presets in Zyn, but it would be nice if others got
love. Perhaps the authors could prepare a few presets that serve as
good demos of just what a given plugin can do ... I suspect there are
so many for Zyn because there are so many for Zyn.
On 25 August 2014 20:51, Stian Jørgensrud
Aug 2014 12:43, "David Gerard" wrote:
>>
>> The LO version gets bugfixes.
>>
>> On 18 August 2014 11:17, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
>> > What is the difference in terms of using the original source vs the LO
>> > version?
>> >
>>
The LO version gets bugfixes.
On 18 August 2014 11:17, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> What is the difference in terms of using the original source vs the LO
> version?
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:00 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Use the Freedes
+1
Use the Freedesktop/LibreOffice version, it's actively maintained (LO
use it extensively) and thus in the distros.
On 18 August 2014 09:58, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Hey guys I would loke to begin working on integration of unit tests and
> cppunit would be a good way to go for this. What do
On 1 July 2014 08:59, Vesa wrote:
> On 07/01/2014 10:52 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>> On 1 July 2014 01:53, Nicholas Cosens wrote:
>>> Then I hit upon a solution that so far has yet to produce any issues.
>>> That is to set the lmms sound output to SDL. For whatever
On 29 July 2014 06:39, Vesa wrote:
> No, CC0.
Yup, CC0 or other public domain equivalent. People have to be able to
use these samples in proprietary music.
- d.
--
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms ap
If I hit control-Z, it doesn't undo the last thing I did, but some
other past thing I did. I've completely failed to have a mental model
of what it does. (As a user, I would expect it to include every knob
tweak - basically, every action in a stack, go back down through that
stack.)
On 29 July 201
On 26 July 2014 11:56, Vesa wrote:
> I think the whole samples issue becomes moot if we first introduce the
> feature where it's possible to embed all sample data in the project
> file. Then introduce the sample library changes only after that, and the
> problem will be solved as old samples will
On 25 July 2014 22:58, Vesa wrote:
> On 07/26/2014 12:49 AM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
>> From my research I began to suspect that LMMS has to have the same licence
>> as the LADSPA plugins we ship with.
> No we don't. The LADSPA plugins are separate programs and not a part of
> LMMS. They can, an
How easy would it to be to make the last setting sticky in .lmmsrc.xml ?
- d.
On 12 July 2014 23:27, Tobiasz Karoń wrote:
> As for 32 bit vs 16 - I used to use 32 all the time, but now I frequently go
> with 16.
> Also 32-bit WAVs are not supported by some portable devices, while 16-bit
> WAVs
On 12 July 2014 13:10, Vesa wrote:
> 1. Why do we still default to 16 bits? 16 bit samples were used in like,
> late 90s or so. Let's make 32 the default.
+1 - I have to make this change every ... single ... time.
> 2. Since "sinc medium" is "recommended", shouldn't it be the default
> option
aise.c:56
56../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c: No such file or directory.
On 6 July 2014 14:36, David Gerard wrote:
> Cheers :-) The answer to my original question is:
>
> -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
>
> On 6 July 2014 14:21,
Cheers :-) The answer to my original question is:
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
On 6 July 2014 14:21, Vesa wrote:
> Fix merged, try it now.
>
> --
> Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
> Tu
On 6 July 2014 14:04, Vesa wrote:
> On 07/06/2014 04:00 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> I run LMMS built from current master. Today's LMMS-master is crashing
>> with a segmentation fault whenever I try to play a piece. Is there a
>> cmake option to build a gdb-frien
I run LMMS built from current master. Today's LMMS-master is crashing
with a segmentation fault whenever I try to play a piece. Is there a
cmake option to build a gdb-friendly debug build or similar?
- d.
--
Open source
On 5 July 2014 16:07, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> We could also change the gate knob to a (logarithmic) volume knob
> where you can specify the minimum gate threshold/level in dB which
> would be the most intuitive solution. A rudimentary calculation could
> convert existing gate settings to the new
Some in A, some in C. It's a special experience.
On 1 July 2014 23:37, Gordon White wrote:
> I have noticed that some plugins start in different keys than others.
>
> --
> Open source business process management suite bui
On 1 July 2014 01:53, Nicholas Cosens wrote:
> Then I hit upon a solution that so far has yet to produce any issues.
> That is to set the lmms sound output to SDL. For whatever reason it
> works. I just tested it again while writing this message by listening to
> music in Clementine and a song in
I've suddenly discovered my old wiki login still works. I should
probably do stuff (and not just complain about Pulse) ... is there a
to-do list up anywhere?
On 30 June 2014 00:43, Ian Sannar wrote:
> I do tutorials on LMMS, I could possible help with the Using LMMS section.
>
> -
On 29 June 2014 21:33, Vesa wrote:
> On 06/29/2014 11:00 PM, Raine M. Ekman wrote:
>> If you don't need to do any MIDI communication in or out of LMMS, I'd
>> suggest ALSA out to the "default" device from LMMS and then in to PA.
>> It has a bit of latency, but it doesn't matter that much if you'r
On 28 June 2014 13:40, Vesa wrote:
> On 06/28/2014 03:28 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> At present I'm using LMMS with alsa as the selected backend, alsa-base
>> is installed. Presumably I've got pulse pretending to be alsa.
> You need to set the "device" set
At present I'm using LMMS with alsa as the selected backend, alsa-base
is installed. Presumably I've got pulse pretending to be alsa.
On 28 June 2014 13:21, Vesa wrote:
> On 06/28/2014 02:21 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> On 28 June 2014 12:11, Vesa wrote:
>>> On 06/28
a rather risky thing to try.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 1:21 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>>
>> On 28 June 2014 12:11, Vesa wrote:
>> > On 06/28/2014 01:47 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>>
>> >> So, sound on Linux ... continues to suck.
>> >
On 28 June 2014 12:11, Vesa wrote:
> On 06/28/2014 01:47 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> So, sound on Linux ... continues to suck.
>> I'm running Ubuntu 14.04 with the default Pulseaudio.
> Well, that's your problem there. PA is not meant for audio work. Stop
> using
So, sound on Linux ... continues to suck.
I'm running Ubuntu 14.04 with the default Pulseaudio. Every now and
then, running LMMS, the sound goes funny and turns into nothing but
noise. (LMMS also plays faster when this happens!) The only fix is
"pulseaudio --kil" and restart LMMS.
I've tried JACK
On 14 June 2014 13:55, Vesa wrote:
> On 06/14/2014 03:42 PM, musikbear wrote:
>> Diiz is 100% correct. the LB does not have legato, so one note over another
>> makes no sense. Yes notestacking is a no feature, and could definately be
>> disregarded, as of legato is no option
>> It will help in bu
On 26 May 2014 23:17, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> http://i.imgur.com/yZ3DnsE.png
That should go in the wiki :-D
- d.
--
The best possible search technologies are now affordable for all companies.
Download your FREE ope
On 26 May 2014 23:01, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> Just create a point and keep dragging it to the right. It's a manual
> process but it should work for now.
This works. Thank you!
> The code should probably set the automation viewable area in proportion to
> the pattern created rather than bas
On 26 May 2014 22:56, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
>> You know, a lot of my problems with apparently-missing features in
>> LMMS are that the features are not so easy to find or have
>> weirdly-abbreviated names ...
> http://i.imgur.com/NUNffbQ.png
Or reduction in discoverability. e.g. Triple Osci
I have a song 170 bars long. I am trying to edit song-global
automation for the volume (to fade in at the start and out at the
end). I right-click master, go to "Edit song global automation" ...
and I can only edit automation for a bit more than what display on the
screen. At 25%, there's 26 bars o
On 26 May 2014 21:23, Vesa wrote:
> On 05/26/2014 11:20 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> So (with Vesa's assistance) I got a bassline editor track to do
>> precisely what I wanted, a continuous glide in pitch using automation
>> on just that track. This is excellent!
>>
So (with Vesa's assistance) I got a bassline editor track to do
precisely what I wanted, a continuous glide in pitch using automation
on just that track. This is excellent!
The trouble is I wanted a three-semitone drop (300 cents), and LMMS
refuses to do more than 100. Even if I edit the .mmp file
I keep doing "git pull" and just getting "Already up-to-date." I ask
because Vesa mentioned committing a bug fix today ...
git-status gives:
$ git status --long
On branch master
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'.
nothing to commit, working directory clean
- d.
---
On 20 May 2014 18:02, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> This is a bit off topic, but there are certain windows that would benefit
> from an "always on top" option. The mixer and the spectrum analyzer are two
> I feel fall into this category.
*Definitely*. I've wanted that to be an always-on-top window
At some point, the word "bassloops" got misspelt as "bassloopes". So
now the samples directory tree, from my completely fresh pull just
now, has the misspelt name "bassloopes" in it. git grep doesn't show
it (it's filepath build/data/samples/bassloopes), so I'm not sure when
this happened ...
- d
On 12 May 2014 19:06, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> In order to build the current master branch I recommend to do a clean
> clone as otherwise you have to deinit and remove the ZynAddSubFX
> submodule manually.
Note: remember to do "git checkout master", as a checkout defaults to
stable-1.0 branch!
On 13 May 2014 14:34, Vesa wrote:
> So I'm looking for opinions... would panning knobs in FX Mixer channels
> be useful? It would probably make the mixer slightly larger vertically,
> taking more screen space... might also have a small performance cost,
> probably pretty negligible though.
Coul
On 13 May 2014 11:18, Vesa wrote:
> On 05/13/2014 09:12 AM, Lukas W. wrote:
>> Good to hear you drop the submodule. However, launchpad's PPA bzr
>> import will still be broken. As far as I know, it doesn't work with
>> any projects that have used submodules in their history…
>> So if we want that
On 8 May 2014 22:31, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> This might be a bit off topic, but why dont we get rid of the mmpt format
> and use mmpz as the template file format of choice.
An mmpt is just an mmpz with a different extension, isn't it? I can
see that being useful for keeping straight which fi
On 8 May 2014 18:35, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> 2014-05-08 19:34 GMT+02:00 Tres Finocchiaro :
>> From my testing, File --> Open still behaves this way as does the left pane
>> navigator. The only way which behaves properly is the toolbar button.
> The toolbutton is what I use and test. The regula
On 8 May 2014 16:21, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> The question is at this stage is it a good idea to leave the mmpt format
> visible in the save dialogue if its only going to export the files as mmpz's
I dunno, as a user I'd just like them to *act* more like templates.
i.e., if I load a template
On 8 May 2014 13:17, Tobiasz Karoń wrote:
> LMMS isn't complete when it comes to LADSPA specification and features.
> 1. Combo switches
> Steve Harris' Impulse Convolver is the perfect example - in Ardour you can
> read all the different options to choose - in LMMS it is just a knob with
> meanin
On 26 April 2014 22:34, Vesa wrote:
> The reason is simple: it's a single-stream instrument. The envelope thus
> would know nothing of the notes played and can't separate the notes from
> each other. Try it yourself - repeat your steps so that you get the
> envelope on a SF2 instrument, then try
So I was working on something, shuffling instruments in and out. I had
one sound that was a sample in AFP, with an envelope defined. I wanted
an SF2 sound, so I dragged SF2 on top and it switched to that. All
good ... except the envelope was clearly still affecting it. And I no
longer had a way to
On 12 April 2014 06:55, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> As there are no unit tests and no mechanism for them. I noticed through some
> emails on libreoffice they are using
> http://cppunit.sourceforge.net/doc/lastest/cppunit_cookbook.html
> Stian if you are in the mood for writing unit tests All the b
On 10 April 2014 21:56, Vesa wrote:
> Again, this is mostly academic speculation, as it's not all that likely
> that we're going to run into any issues very soon that prevent us from
> supporting XP. (Although in the long term, that becomes increasingly
> more likely.) But personally, if I tomorr
On 1 April 2014 08:11, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Are you using Israel's PPA? Or the other PPA that i know there is if that is
> the case I think that the packages in the PPA need to be updated to have
> fluid pulled in as a dependency.
I'm compiling from source, pulled from github, as I said.
On 1 April 2014 06:33, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> I am a bit suprised you had to install fluid seperatly, and that it wasnt
> pulled in as a dependency during install of the deb package.
I haven't installed it from the distro since 0.4.15 in 13.10, since
then I've been building from source and
On 31 March 2014 23:12, Vesa wrote:
> My advice is, remove your lmms-git directory and start over by cloning the
> repository from github:
> cd ~
> rm lmms-git -R
> git clone git://github.com/LMMS/lmms.git lmms-git
> cd lmms-git
> git checkout master
> git submodule init
> git submodule update
>
On 31 March 2014 22:06, Vesa wrote:
> As you can see here, they're clearly in the source:
> https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/tree/master/plugins
> Just to make sure you're on the correct branch - Go to your local git
> directory and type:
> git pull
> git checkout master
> git submodule i
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
