buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on log4j2-nightly

The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder log4j2-nightly while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/log4j2-nightly/builds/46 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu Build Reason: The Nightly schedule

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1094) Multi thread initialization problem

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14698203#comment-14698203 ] Bart S. commented on LOG4J2-1094: - I think expecting a subsystem to configure itself auto

Re: Version 2 outreach?

That doesn't really mean anything. I'm just saying that today feedback might be handy instead of that neediness. Sorry to say, but I have an interest in this project as well of course, and If I seem rude, it's just because I want things to be clear for me and for you as well. Maybe that is pre

Re: Version 2 outreach?

"I simply don’t have time to read long emails that a) don’t ask me how to solve a specific problem, b) don’t ask for a specific feature to be implemented, c) don’t ask me how to explain how something works or d) don’t say “What can I do to help”." All of what you say basically boils down to th

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1094) Multi thread initialization problem

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14698286#comment-14698286 ] Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1094: -- Note that there also is the Core's {{Configu

setting the level for a logger tree

Let's say I have a logger tree like: R R.P R.P.C1 R.P.C1.L1 R.P.C2.L2 R.P.C2 R.P.C2.L1 R.P.C2.L2 and I want to set R.P.C2 and all it's descendants to a given level. In Log4j 1.2, I do: public static void setChildren(final Logger parentLogger, final Level newLevel) { final Enumeratio

Re: Version 2 outreach?

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Xen wrote: > That doesn't really mean anything. I'm just saying that today feedback > might be handy instead of that neediness. > > Sorry to say, but I have an interest in this project as well of course, > and If I seem rude, it's just because I want things to be

Re: Version 2 outreach?

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Xen wrote: > That doesn't really mean anything. I'm just saying that today feedback > might be handy instead of that neediness. > > Sorry to say, but I have an interest in this project as well of course, > and If I seem rude, it's just because I want things to be

Re: Version 2 outreach?

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Xen wrote: > Currently I /can't/ work on Log4J because I have supplied a patch or at > least a request for comments on the Jira and I haven't had any feedback on > that. So how am I supposed to "go ahead and do stuff?". Okay it was also > because for a few days

Build failed in Jenkins: Log4j 2.x #1290

See Changes: [ggregory] [LOG4J2-1090] Add Core Configurator APIs to change a logger's level. App [ggregory] [LOG4J2-1090] Add Core Configurator APIs to change a logger's level. Add -- [...truncate

Re: Version 2 outreach?

Op 15-8-2015 om 17:26 schreef Gary Gregory: I am sorry to read that you are ill. I hope get better soon. Heh, you don't know half of half of half of half ;-). But thanks for the comment and the sweet words. Op 15-8-2015 om 17:27 schreef Gary Gregory: On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Xen

Re: setting the level for a logger tree

Why do you want to set the level on the LoggerConfig and all its descendants? Setting the level just on the LoggerConfig will achieve the same thing, so long as none of its descendants has a LoggerConfig Sent from my iPad > On Aug 15, 2015, at 8:25 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Let's say I have

Re: Version 2 outreach?

My plan is to write some code and then ask for feedback. That seems to have worked well for us in the past. Sent from my iPad > On Aug 15, 2015, at 8:36 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Xen wrote: >> >> >> Currently I /can't/ work on Log4J because I have suppl

Re: setting the level for a logger tree

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Why do you want to set the level on the LoggerConfig and all its > descendants? > Because I clearly did not educate myself fully in this topic. ;-) Hence I am looking for a shortcut by asking on the ML :-) > Setting the level just on the Lo

Jenkins build is back to normal : Log4j 2.x #1291

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org