Re: Using perl for a high performance mailer daemon ?

2001-06-19 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:39:32AM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote: > Greg Cope sent the following bits through the ether: > > I want to design a mailer for sending large numbers of individual > > messages to a large list. > > You're writing a mailer in Perl. Mailers have been done before. If > you're

Re: Templating Solutions

2001-06-19 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 08:08:50PM +1000, Ian Brayshaw wrote: > I am finding XSLT & XML to be a good alternative to normal templating > techniques. One of the biggest benifits I've found is being able to generate > the one data set and have it rendered in different ways for different > applicat

The List Has Moved

2001-06-19 Thread Dominic Mitchell
In case anybody hasn't noticed, [EMAIL PROTECTED] has now become [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your mail filters may need updating, you've probably got a ton of junk in your inbox in case you haven't noticed. :-) -Dom -- | Semantico: creators of major online resources | | URL: http://www.s

Re: Templating Solutions

2001-06-18 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 05:39:11PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 06:30:24PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: > > Simon Wilcox wrote: > > > I avoided HTML::Embperl, HTML::Mason & Apache::ASP because they all > > > embed perl into the template which is a Bad Thing (tm). > >

Re: Templating Solutions

2001-06-18 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 04:36:00PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > In a moment of stupidity[1] I agreed to write an article for lathos on > templating solutions for Perl. This was an attempt to finally break my > writing block/issues/mindset problems. It is going to be a compare and > contrast ar

Re: CMS frameworks

2001-06-18 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 10:33:57AM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > Some guys out here in Brizzle want to do "Yet Another CMS". Are there > any frameworks out there they can plug together to make something > plausible? > > I guess bits of the 2.0 slashcode do the job nicely, what with being > TT b

Re: YAPC::Europe (Ignore this request)

2001-06-15 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 08:20:15PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > or do they have unmetered called in Holland? If so and we had > > a direct line we could beg a Dutch Monger to call in and > > set up ppp to their broadband or similar connection >

Re: crazy golf

2001-06-15 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:41:43PM +0100, Chris Heathcote wrote: > Beware, it's in Flash (or Shockwave) > http://www.electrotank.com/lab/minigolf.html > > Hole 17 is a bugger How much time did it take you to find out this incredible fact? -Dom -- | Semantico: creators of major online resource

Re: your mail

2001-06-14 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:16:00PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > yet another test I'm sorry, but you appear to have failed again. This message is quite visible! :-( -Dom -- | Semantico: creators of major online resources | | URL: http://www.semantico.com/ |

Re: Online Bookshops

2001-06-14 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:42:30PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Robert Shiels wrote: > > Richard wrote: > > > If I'm trying to avoid Amazon for some technical books, what sites are > > > currently suggested? > > > > I think we need a FAQ, I'm sure this has come up a few time

Re: *Buffy's Not Included

2001-06-14 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:44:50AM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote: > At 10:01 14/06/01 +0100, you wrote: > >The data from these files will primarily be diplayed within an HTML page. > >A > >perceived advantage of XML here (for someone who has barely scratched the > >surface of what XML can do), i

Re: London.pm List Weekly Summary 2001-06-11

2001-06-13 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:41:56PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote: > In other news: Microsoft SQL Server sucking (SQueaL), Sun Ultra > Enterprise 1, google++, the Sony Clie being small and cute, > checking out pubs for the next meet, buffy, search.cpan.org being > hacked (Catalog module apparently)

Re: Upcoming technical meeting

2001-06-12 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If this is because you don't have somewhere to stay on the Thursday night, > > I'm sure we can collectively find a way around that. If you bring your > > passport, we'll even let y

Re: Persistent Perl

2001-06-12 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:31:44AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: > Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > > And you'd have to make the daemon threaded, or end up running multiple > > pre-forking daemons to do the job. At which point, you're only saving > > the fork time a

Re: Default library paths

2001-06-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 05:40:38PM +0100, Matthew Robinson wrote: > Apologies in advance if I have missed something blindingly obvious :) > > I need to change the default library paths in a compiled copy of perl. > Basically, I want to move /usr/lib/perl5 into /usr/local/lib/perl5. I am > unable

Re: www.gateway.gov.uk

2001-06-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:56:19AM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote: > At 18:51 09/06/01 +0100, you wrote: > > > >Precisely. And using Java et al is a discrimination against the mobility > >impaired. > > Not to mention the way it discriminates totally against people who can't > afford, don't ha

Re: London.pm posting stats

2001-06-07 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 04:26:44AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: > Dominic Mitchell: 152 Oh dear. And I haven't even been subscribed since the beginning of the year... -Dom -- | Semantico: creators of major online resources | | URL: http://www.seman

Re: Sony Clie (was: Re: Social meet)

2001-06-07 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:40:20AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote: > On Thu, 07 Jun 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > I tried looking up developer docs for the clie on the web, but there's a > > a dearth of information about it, and what there is is protected by > > so

Re: Sony Clie (was: Re: Social meet)

2001-06-07 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:10:48AM +0100, Robert Shiels wrote: > From: "Dominic Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:45:09AM +0100, Robert Shiels wrote: > > > Between 5 and 6pm I'll be wandering up and down TCR looking for a new

Sony Clie (was: Re: Social meet)

2001-06-07 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:45:09AM +0100, Robert Shiels wrote: > Between 5 and 6pm I'll be wandering up and down TCR looking for a new PDA. > Sony Clie is my preferred choice at the moment. If anyone knows a good shop, > or is good at haggling and wants to help, I'm on 07801 814138. Has anybody g

Re: [Possible Job] Perl, Linux

2001-06-07 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 08:46:39AM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I presume that this is a permie thing? > > Yes. And I'd estimate that _most_ of you I know would be, um, a bit > too "heavyweight" for them... You calling me fat, boy? -Dom -- |

Big Shiny Toys (was: Re: M$ SQueaLServer)

2001-06-06 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 12:42:34AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote: > Leons links to TPC are ace .. thats amazing .. the best NT powered thing > is at a piss poor 1700 ... presumably NT doesnt scale well to a 128 > processor UltraSparc then ;))) AFAIK, the starfire (Sun Ultra Enterprise 1) only g

Re: [OT] BUFFY No spoilers

2001-06-04 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:34:10AM +0100, Dean wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:29:14AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > > ah well, we can probably also expect "The Rock" from WWF > > to show up and lay the smack down on some vamps, also > > expect to here plans for a BtVS movie as well, so they

Re: crazy golf

2001-06-01 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 01:16:51PM +0100, Cross David - dcross wrote: > From: Paul Mison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:07 PM > > > (Anyone standing on the platform of reforming bank holidays? > > I'd buy that for a dollar.) > > Whatever happened to the plan to do away with

Re: Slow disks under linux

2001-05-31 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 05:05:28PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: > Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > > I'd like to tell you how to get the flash plugin working, but I couldn't > > because it's a Linux .so and can't be linked in to my FreeBSD konqueror. :-( > &

Re: Slow disks under linux

2001-05-31 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 08:47:28AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:41:11PM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote: > > Are you using xinerama (i.e. so your monitors are spliced together into > > one display?) > > No, it's KDE2 which seems to split them into separate desktops. The > mo

Re: Slow disks under linux

2001-05-31 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 08:42:50AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:26:14PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > You might need to run a 2nd copy of kwin, like this: > > > > % kwin -- display :0.1 > > (--display) Sorry, saw that after I

Re: Slow disks under linux

2001-05-31 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 08:12:30AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: > OK, getting more esoteric now -- is anyone running dual monitors? I > finally got my G450 running with KDE2 but the window manager doesn't add > decoration to the windows on the 2ndary monitor, i.e. I can't move > windows and they d

Re: Slow disks under linux

2001-05-31 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:27:07AM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:19:21AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: > > Paul, who will probably end up using FreeBSD since its hardware RAID > > (HPT370) and video (Matrox G450 dual) is apparently better... > > vinum in mirror mo

Re: Email::Valid

2001-05-30 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:40:03AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote: > All the one's that claimed to be valid from E::V failed chaddr! > [EMAIL PROTECTED] had this result from chaddr: > user: andyw. is good > host: hillway.com is good > address `[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is bad: rfc822 failure > > So I guess

Re: l337

2001-05-30 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:37:48AM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote: > At 10:28 30/05/01 +0100, you wrote: > > >> my name is jon i have installed an irc client on my linux shell account > >can u tell me where the c00lest irc places are like what server and channel > >and stuff u all use so i can le

Re: Decisions decisions

2001-05-25 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 02:51:44PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > * Dominic Mitchell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 02:30:23PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > > > It seems that a PDP 11/73 is small enough to run at home. So do I get one > > > or

Re: Decisions decisions

2001-05-25 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 02:30:23PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > It seems that a PDP 11/73 is small enough to run at home. So do I get one > or not? Yes! You'll have enough blinkenlights then. You can always get 7th Edition running on it. http://minnie.tuhs.org/PUPS/index.html -Dom

Re: POSIX::localeconv()/Germany

2001-05-24 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:05:59PM -0500, Mike Jarvis wrote: > Wednesday, May 23, 2001, 2:45:24 PM, Dave Cross wrote: > > DC> Haven't tried the routine you're talking about, but if you ever decide to > DC> give up on them, the Number::Format module (from CPAN) will solve all of > DC> your probl

Email Style (was: Re: Election Manifestos)

2001-05-23 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:32:09PM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote: > At 07:49 23/05/01 +0100, you wrote: > >At 17:37 22/05/2001, Roger Burton West wrote: > > > > > >>And get a shell account, why don't you? > > > >Thanks. I already have several. > > [snip] > > > >Much as I'd love it if everyone

Re: MIME stuff - Am I missing something?

2001-05-22 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 03:06:39PM +0100, Barbie wrote: > From: "Robert Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > From: Roger Burton West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > man 1 file > > > man 5 magic > > > less /usr/share/misc/magic # on many systems > > > > > > > except anything written my MS of

Re: MIME stuff - Am I missing something?

2001-05-22 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 01:27:10PM +0100, Barbie wrote: > Using the code below, and calling the routine with a *.jpg file. Why does > the mime_type return "text/plain"? I've also tried using MIME::Head->read > with a filehandle and it returns the same. I would investigate CPAN further > for clues

Re: Long shot

2001-05-21 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:30:27PM +0100, Paul Mison wrote: > On 21/05/2001 at 14:15 +0100, Mike Wyer wrote: > >On Mon, 21 May 2001, Robert Shiels wrote: > > >>I use Outlook Express, I like it a lot. It works for me. > > > >Much badness. We are withdrawing Outlook and associates from all our > >W

Re: Long shot

2001-05-21 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:15:28PM +0100, Mike Wyer wrote: > On Mon, 21 May 2001, Robert Shiels wrote: > >From: "Jonathan Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: 21 May 2001 13:28 > >Subject: Long shot > > > > > >> Anyone know a windows IMAP client that: > >> 1. Isn't Net

Re: O'Reilly Safari - anyone use it?

2001-05-21 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 05:05:20PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > At 13:27 20/05/2001, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote: > > >You can't expect to steal music and then bitch about how someone is > >stealing copies of your book on line. > > True. But just so as we know where we all stand. I have only ever us

Re: Some Northern Irish Fun and Games ...

2001-05-18 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 07:27:10AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > > This is the sort of thing that happens in the country i grew up in > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/northern_ireland/newsid_1336000/1336347.stm Is that Alan Cox in the Red Hat in that photo? Inquiring minds wish t

Re: pc components

2001-05-17 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 02:18:16AM +1000, Ian Brayshaw wrote: > I saw Craig Charles at the Melbourne Comedy Festival a couple of years ago > and it was a waste of time and money. He walked out on stage, said he was > p1ssed, drank beer in front of the audience for an hour, occasionally > scream

Re: Shoot out

2001-05-17 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 03:12:58PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote: > I don't find that enormously convincing as a reason, though. > You may have noticed that it's possible to write obfuscated > Perl programs ;) No, I've only over seen pleasant, readable perl code posted to this list. > C++ is also p

Re: Shoot out

2001-05-17 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 03:04:47PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote: Statement: > (And _boy_ can you write obfuscated Ocaml programs if you try! > User-definable infix operators are an especially nice touch in > that regard) Answer: > Why isn't Ocaml more popular? Is there a good reason? -Dom

Re: pc components

2001-05-17 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 02:36:58PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 11:01:11AM +0100, Chris Ball wrote: > > > > find / -name "*your_base*" -exec chown us:us {} \; > > If I had a penny for every variation on this sig I'd seen, I'd... er, > well, I might have a cheap Mars bar. B

Re: test

2001-05-17 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:06:41AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > just a test You say that it's just test. Who are we to believe you. In fact, I think you're part of the US Govt consipracy to overload foreign networks with test messages. Prove that you're not. -Dom (Not My Real Name)

Re: Latest Perl Journal

2001-05-16 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 01:19:36PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:05:25AM +0100, Cross David - dcross wrote: > > > Loved the footnote on page 78. > > > > Thanks very much. It's one of my favourite jokes. It was trialed at a > > london.pm technical meeting some months ago

Re: Caller ID (was Re: Enough!)

2001-05-16 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:59:07AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote: > I do keep intending to do something cute with my ISDN adapter and log the > stuff coming out of the D channel and see whats in there ... but time has > prevented it etc. I'd be interested to hear how you get on... I was under the im

Re: Enough!

2001-05-15 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 10:04:45AM +0100, Cross David - dcross wrote: > From: Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > However what i'd really hate is any restrictions placed > > on the topics of London.pm , politics should be just as > > welcome as BtVS. > > Or, even, Perl :) Oh, please, we

Re: Enough!

2001-05-15 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:04:43PM +0100, Natalie Ford wrote: > At 15:09 14/05/01, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > >Please, would you take the politics elsewhere? Some of us really don't > >give a shit either way. > > Hear hear! I am getting tired of hitting delete... :) procmail++ If anybody wants a

Re: JAMES DUNCAN

2001-05-14 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 04:50:53PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 04:45:13PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > Particularly with the lack of an Internet Driving License, anyway. > > It's crap, but... http://www.ecdl.com/ Just quickly looking through

Re: JAMES DUNCAN

2001-05-14 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 04:42:27PM +0100, Roger Burton West wrote: > On or about Mon, May 14, 2001 at 03:32:32PM +, Steve Mynott typed: > >Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> If you really work for ebookers.com, why are you sending from a hotmail > &

Re: JAMES DUNCAN

2001-05-14 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 03:32:32PM +, Steve Mynott wrote: > Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If you really work for ebookers.com, why are you sending from a hotmail > > address? It doesn't lend credence to your request to have somebody else &g

Re: JAMES DUNCAN

2001-05-14 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 12:24:54PM +0100, Melissa Fivelman wrote: > Just to let you know that we have had numerous e-mails coming in addressed > to James Duncan from your address. > > He no longer works for ebookers. Please delete his address asap. > > Many thanks > > Melissa Fivelman > IT Adm

Bioinformatics jobs (was: Re: Politics (was RE: BOFHs requiring license))

2001-05-14 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:18:00PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:06:42PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote: > > Is this the point where I can try and recruit some of you compscis to the > > bioinformatics revolution? > > I've always thought it sounded like fun. > > How does

Re: Long Dark Teatime of the Soul

2001-05-14 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 11:56:48AM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/newsid_1326000/1326657.stm Amongst the many other tributes floating around, I found this one quite entertaining: http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20010513 -Dom

Re: Monitors

2001-05-14 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:52:06AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: > Me neither. I came to the startling conclusion about 5 years ago that I > don't really like. I don't hate it, just don't particularly enjoy it > except in odd moods and even then mostly dark chocolate. "Will drool for Green & Black's

Re: UK programmers left-wing? was Re: BOFHs requiring license

2001-05-14 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 10:19:27AM +, Steve Mynott wrote: > There are certainly far fewer left-wing bookshops now than twenty > years ago. Most of the young seem now more interested in single > issues like animal rights, globalisation etc then traditional > socialism. Hey, that's just the yo

Re: Long Dark Teatime of the Soul

2001-05-14 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 05:55:56PM +0100, Neil Ford wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 11:56:48AM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > > > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/newsid_1326000/1326657.stm > > > Unfortunately I got the phone call at 7:10 this morning :-( > > Definitely a strange day. I

Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:15:56PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2001, Mark Fowler wrote: > > (I don't eat chocolate.) > > *shock* It's not strictly necessary, as you still get the kinder egg toys... -Dom

Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:59:13PM +0100, Cross David - dcross wrote: > From: Dominic Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 4:22 PM > > > How many things do you have on top of your monitor? > > Here - none (not sure why my mini-Tux never made it

Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:51:40PM +0100, Robert Thompson wrote: > But at Torrington I had 8 items ( I think ) including marzipan models of > Bagpuss (complete with Organ Mouse) and Tux. > > They have yet to migrate to my job. They've probably been eaten by now... marzipan++ # tasty -Dom

Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:48:40PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: > Philip Newton wrote: > > I generally bring one of my small stuffed toys to work > ^ > or my wife's. She has me than I. Eeek, I have more than my SO and I am wondering if in f

Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:43:29PM +0200, Niklas Nordebo wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > How many things do you have on top of your monitor? > > I have a solitary copy of a japanese netsuke depicting a cat. > > My machine is

Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:33:42PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote: > > On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > > How many things do you have on top of your monitor? > > > None ;-) > Boring! You should be able to manage some clip on furry animals. For ref

Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell
How many things do you have on top of your monitor? -Dom

Re: (OT) constrained walk

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:17:10PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: > Paul Mison wrote: > > there may be a second constrained walk > > What's a "constrained walk"? Like a silly walk, but less offensive. -Dom

Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:14:08AM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:41:20AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: > > > Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > > > assuming you can get into a bourne shell, y

Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:41:20AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: > Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > assuming you can get into a bourne shell, you can > > still do things like write cat(1) in sh, as well. > > This is not going to help you pause output. > > > Although it&#

Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:10:13AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: > Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:25:00PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > > If your terminal has flow control enabled it will eat ^Q > > > and ^S for you. > > > s

Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:25:00PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > If your terminal has flow control enabled it will eat ^Q and ^S for you. > stty -ixon > removes this problem. But then how do you pause that long ls listing when your less,more,pg,sed,awk&perl binaries are all fscked? :-) -Dom

Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-10 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:44:41PM +0100, Struan Donald wrote: > > In Emacs, it's ^Q, then the character you want. > > only ^Q? that's not like emacs :) Well, it's assuming that nobody's fiddled with the keymaps. You could alternatively do: M-x quoted-insert RET RET -Dom

Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-10 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:35:29PM +0100, Struan Donald wrote: > kind of off topic but how do you get things like ^M and such like into > a file for, say, writing vi macros? > > i've had a look through some docs but i'm beggining to suspect it's > one of those bit of unix aracana know to a chosen

Re: Bah!

2001-05-10 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 11:18:22AM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:54:04AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: > > > David Cantrell wrote: > > > http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/cv > > > > I was going to post "I can't open that in Microsoft Word; please re-send it" > > as a jok

Re: Bah!

2001-05-10 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:54:04AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: > David Cantrell wrote: > > http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/cv > > I was going to post "I can't open that in Microsoft Word; please re-send it" > as a joke, but when I tried to open the PDF version using the Acrobat > plug-in in Nets

Re: More revolting natives

2001-05-04 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 04:47:43PM +0100, Dean wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 04:32:35PM +0100, Cross David - dcross wrote: > > Well, the 13 year old now claims to be 20. But no, this is his friend bk who > > "kills people for a living" in Hereford! > > Um. I no longer want children. You *want

Re: tube strike / may meeting postponed til 10th

2001-05-02 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:57:08PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > PO? ask po to do webby things like googling. He won't core dump. Promise. +or not dadadodo or not here while hitherto is on holiday Dom2? hmmm... Dom2 is still annoyed by how bad emacs is at doing xml, +actually, given how

Re: Stuffed camel

2001-05-02 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 12:00:11AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > At 19:25 29/04/2001, Leon Brocard wrote: > >Can *someone* please pick a date to go visit the camel? > > Can't be done until a) the foot and mouth stuff has died down and b) I've > worked out exactly who has paid for slices. Mmmm... S

Re: Mailbox power ..

2001-04-30 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 09:04:39AM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote: > > this mornings powerdown @ 06:00 .. what time did yours come back up and > > has it gone up and down again since then .. mines been down twice :( > > Oh bcks. Mine hasn't come back up at all. H.. I have a feeling > Sun

Re: Good Accountants

2001-04-27 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:30:20PM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote: > Philip Newton wrote: > > Chris Ball wrote: > > > Are postings subscriber only ..? ] > > Subscriber not even, more like. I bet this email never makes it to the > list for a start. > > I blame majordomo, when's that mailman thi

Re: Good Accountants

2001-04-27 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 01:59:53PM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, you wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:11:40AM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > > > > > Ho ho, you should have heard the stick that support got from that little > > > p

Re: Good Accountants

2001-04-27 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 09:23:16AM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote: > Robin Szemeti wrote: > > > > now I am absolutely totally 100% certain that some web browser (and thats > > all it is) should *not* mess around with the way I view folders. I think > > that was a turning point for me and my judge

Re: Good Accountants

2001-04-27 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:41:00AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote: > [ and don't even ask me about the time Demon distributed some pox ridden > disk with IE4.1 on it ..'err I just installed the latest version of > Turnpike and seem to have inherited IE4 .. how do I get rid of it as its > screwed my de

Re: London.pm List Weekly Summary 2001-04-23

2001-04-26 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:05:38PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote: > Jon Galliers asked about naming a file correctly when downloading from > a CGI. Niklas Nordebo and Merijn Broeren provided solutions: > http://www.mail-archive.com/london-pm%40lists.dircon.co.uk/msg04654.html Doh! We entirely missed

Online Banking (was: Re: Good Accountants)

2001-04-26 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > I went with Barclays because they gave 12 months free banking and > could group the online banking with my personal accounts. On a side issue, do you know of any online banks that allow personal accounts to download historical dat

Re: perlismybitch.com

2001-04-25 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 10:14:02PM -0500, will wrote: > An old boss of mine wanted a domain that was expiring in a few weeks once so > he ran a cron task that checked the status of the domain every hour and > automatically registered it when it became available. I am not sure but I > think they r

Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs

2001-04-24 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:58:23AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: > Here's a perl question (OK, not really).. Is anyone aware of a > compatibility/wrapper library which a developer could use to take an > app using the MySQL API and with some (ideally) minimal munging turn > it into Oracle OCI or Pro

Re: next social meeting vs tube strike

2001-04-19 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:40:02PM +0100, Mike Wyer wrote: > Camels are quite hard to see at London Zoo at the moment, owing to the > foot 'n mouth situation. I was there a couple of weeks back, and the > heffalump house was shut. The penguins ain't bad, though. Last time I saw penguins at a zoo,

Re: Komodo

2001-04-19 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:02:03AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: > Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 04:34:49PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > > Emacs has been able to do this for probably 10 years or more. I think > > > even vi

Re: Beginners Guide

2001-04-19 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:29:09AM +0100, Robert Shiels wrote: > From: "Dominic Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Dunno, but I sure hope the digital packages get a bit better than the > > current offerings otherwise I'll just switch off the telly and not turn

Re: Beginners Guide

2001-04-19 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:49:09PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > And there was me thinking that Chris was going to say that he doesn't have > a TV either. But he didn't. I don't have a TV. But I'm currently camped out > in my parents house, and they have 2. But I learn that they will both be > ob

Re: Mourning clothes for London.pm

2001-04-18 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 05:43:20PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: > Alexis Denisof (who plays Wesley) is going out with Alyson Hannigan > (Willow). For some reason, this is made even worse by the automatic word association of "Wesley" and "Crusher". Excuse me whilst I puke now. -Dom

Re: Komodo

2001-04-18 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 04:47:57PM +0100, Dean wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 04:34:49PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > Emacs has been able to do this for probably 10 years or more. I think > > even vim can do it now, too. > > Never noticed that! I normally edit my

Re: Komodo

2001-04-18 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 04:26:42PM +0100, Dean wrote: > I've been using this for C coding recently and its not too bad. It has a > couple of nice tricks though like clicking on the compile errors and being > taken to the line. Emacs has been able to do this for probably 10 years or more. I thin

Re: CPAN search from mozilla address bar

2001-04-18 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 01:35:25PM +0100, Struan Donald wrote: > no idea if anyone will find this useful but: > > if you use mozilla (on linux/*nix at least) stick this: > > name="CPAN" >description="CPAN Search" >method="GET" >action="http://search.cpan.org/search" > > > > >

Re: Broadcast datagrams

2001-04-18 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 04:26:56AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 12:11:45PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > You're probably going to have to grep through the kernel source to see > > why it's being returned in that case. And I have a snea

Re: Broadcast datagrams

2001-04-18 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 04:02:29AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 11:49:20AM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > If you have a complete /usr/src installed, look in there for examples > > of how it's done in C (it looks like you have a BSD machine - so i

Re: Broadcast datagrams

2001-04-18 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 03:25:09AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: > Anyone hackers here sent broadcast packets? I think this is how you > do it: > > #!/usr/bin/perl -w > use strict; > > use Socket; > my $dst = inet_aton("172.30.255.255"); > > socket(SOCKET, PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, getprotobyname("ud

Re: Komodo

2001-04-18 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 02:59:51AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: > Who said "release early, release often". Apple are doing the right > thing, IMO. Probably Eric Raymond. Which reminds me, there used to be a comment in the code for an authentication server at Demon: /* fork early, fork often

Re: TPJ Reborn

2001-04-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 05:44:57PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > Sorry, ol bean, I'm already piping this list through two bots (my archiver > and my URL-hunter). They don't say anything in public though. Yet. You could make them auto-send a rude message on encountering text/html... -Dom

  1   2   >