HTTP::Request & cookies

2001-09-30 Thread Paul Makepeace
I'm curious if anyone's familiar with how LWP gets cookies into the final request that's sent. AIUI, you create a request using an HTTP::Headers object. Then the request object is sent to the user-agent object. Now, the user-agent object has a cookie jar associated with it (not the request object

Re: London.pm List Weekly Summary 2001-09-24

2001-09-30 Thread Leon Brocard
Paul Makepeace sent the following bits through the ether: > What did you use to write/modify the game? The Inform Compiler, see http://www.gnelson.demon.co.uk/inform.html for way too much information about the topic. Leon -- Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/ Nanow

Re: My First Module

2001-09-30 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I think it's [EMAIL PROTECTED] again. That's always worked for me, anyway. > There is also now a handy web interface to this on pause.perl.org - it still mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it formats it correctly and you dont have to remember all the d

Re: HTTP::Request & cookies

2001-09-30 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Paul Makepeace wrote: > > How can I prove to myself it's really sending the cookies? > Write (or hack from other source) a baby httpd that prints the whole request to stdout ? /J\

Re: HTTP::Request & cookies

2001-09-30 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 02:16:50AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: > How can I prove to myself it's really sending the cookies? An excellent piece of software called netcat may help you here: nc -p 8080 -l and then add a cookie into the jar for :8080 then set LWP to point to :8080 with that same p

Re: HTTP::Request & cookies

2001-09-30 Thread Mark Blackman
> > How can I prove to myself it's really sending the cookies? > Could use (on either client or server) tcpdump -c 8 -w /tmp/rawpackets port 80 (8 is the number of packets, choose any number that suits you) followed by strings -a /tmp/rawpackets - Mark

Re: HTTP::Request & cookies

2001-09-30 Thread Mark Blackman
> > > > How can I prove to myself it's really sending the cookies? > > > > Could use (on either client or server) > > tcpdump -c 8 -w /tmp/rawpackets port 80 make that tcpdump -c N -w /tmp/rawpackets -s 1600 port 80 (to get the whole packet) - Mark

Re: London.pm List Weekly Summary 2001-09-24

2001-09-30 Thread Mark Fowler
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Leon Brocard wrote: > Paul Makepeace sent the following bits through the ether: > > > What did you use to write/modify the game? > > The Inform Compiler, see http://www.gnelson.demon.co.uk/inform.html > for way too much information about the topic. (Long post with no useful

Re: HTTP::Request & cookies

2001-09-30 Thread Mark Fowler
Paul wrote: > How can I prove to myself it's really sending the cookies? Deja other thread: A program I wrote in POE act as a proxy that prints out headers to STDOUT while it serves the request. http://2shortplanks.com/temp/verbose-proxy.txt Because it was written in a rush you'll need to spe

PGP::FindKey (more CPAN fun)

2001-09-30 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, all. There was a thread a while ago about an interface to a PGP web-keyserver I was thinking of writing, and it ended vaguely positively. It's stupidly few lines of code, so I went ahead and the finished .pm is up at: http://printf.net/FindKey.pm I'm really unsure about the namespace - I h

Re: London.pm List Weekly Summary 2001-09-24

2001-09-30 Thread Kate L Pugh
* WARNING. SPOILERS AT BOTTOM OF POST. * Paul Makepeace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> [...] (only ever tried HHGTTG). [...] Kate L Pugh wrote: >> This is the clue that enabled Jon to complete the last task. >> Leon, no fair :) Paul Makepeace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, you can

Re: HTTP::Request & cookies

2001-09-30 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Mark" == Mark Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mark> Paul wrote: >> How can I prove to myself it's really sending the cookies? Mark> Deja other thread: A program I wrote in POE act as a proxy that prints Mark> out headers to STDOUT while it serves the request. Mark> http://2shortplank

Re: Chocolate/beer (was Film Recommendation)

2001-09-30 Thread Lucy McWilliam
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 06:09:55PM -0400, David H. Adler wrote: > > What pretty pictures are those? we got plain colored lights and lights > > that actually say "walk" and "don't walk". > > > I have some vague memory of somewhere where the signs "hel

Re: Chocolate/beer (was Film Recommendation)

2001-09-30 Thread Lucy McWilliam
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 02:45:52PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, David H. Adler wrote: > > > I should also point out that I haven't paid much attention to the lights > > > as anything other than vague guides since I got hit by a taxi while I > > > had the right of way w

Re: My First Module

2001-09-30 Thread Tony Bowden
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 12:14:47PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > There is also now a handy web interface to this on pause.perl.org - it > still mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it formats it correctly and you dont > have to remember all the different options for the various columns in the > DLSO or

Re: Chocolate/beer (was Film Recommendation)

2001-09-30 Thread sue gray
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 09:38:32AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > * David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > And here I thought you wanted to come back and visit sometime. I'll > > alert the border guards... :-) > > > > Don't do that, please DHA, the US has the most insanely tight sec

Re: Chocolate/beer (was Film Recommendation)

2001-09-30 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
robin szemeti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A Brit whilst passing through immigration control in Sydney was stopped by an > Australian immigration officer who asked him : " ... and do you have a > criminal record?" .. to which the Brit replies "no, I'm sorry I don't ... I > didn't reallise you

Re: Chocolate/beer (was Film Recommendation)

2001-09-30 Thread Sue Spence
Nicholas Clark wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 06:09:55PM -0400, David H. Adler wrote: > > What pretty pictures are those? we got plain colored lights and lights > > that actually say "walk" and "don't walk". > > > > I should also point out that I haven't paid much attention to the lights > >

Films again (was Re: Chocolate/beer (was Film Recommendation))

2001-09-30 Thread Mark Fowler
DHA wrote, even though the quoting on the message I just replied to seems to imply otherwise : > Nope. The success of people like Pauly Shore (can't think of an English > equivalent offhand - which I suppose is a good thing) is still > unexplained. Interesting. Simon, Paul, Celia and I just wa

Re: HTTP::Request & cookies

2001-09-30 Thread Paul Makepeace
> > "Mark" == Mark Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Mark> Paul wrote: > >> How can I prove to myself it's really sending the cookies? > > Mark> Deja other thread: A program I wrote in POE act as a proxy that prints > Mark> out headers to STDOUT while it serves the request. > > Mark>

Re: Chocolate/beer (was Film Recommendation)

2001-09-30 Thread David H. Adler
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:59:42PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote: > > > > Oh, the "I'll be ba-ack" guy from 'California Man', known (for some > reason) in the US as 'Encino Man'. So as not to confuse the EVIL with the song by the Move, maybe? :-) dha -- David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

Re: Chocolate/beer (was Film Recommendation)

2001-09-30 Thread David H. Adler
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 11:17:00PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 06:09:55PM -0400, David H. Adler wrote: > > What pretty pictures are those? we got plain colored lights and lights > > that actually say "walk" and "don't walk". > > > > I should also point out that I haven