* David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:10:26PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >
> > Caffreys - brewed in Ireland since 1999, IIRC
>
> Brewed? Manufactured, you mean.
>
Yip, it was originaly made for girls and shandy drinkers, who didnt
like the taste of proper
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:54:31PM +0100, Chris Heathcote wrote:
> On Fri, 3 May 2002 21:10:26 +0100, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >Can we find a suitable Shepherd Neame pub? Or Adnams?
>
> Harveys?
(At the risk of being too IRC) I'd second a vote for Harveys.
How many peopl
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:20:10PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> Founders Arms gets my vote.
Sorry, you don't count because you're not voting for the Anchor.
Only the old bits or outside though.
--
Richard Clamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 3 May 2002 21:10:26 +0100, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Can we find a suitable Shepherd Neame pub? Or Adnams?
Harveys?
c.
--
Die von Ihnen angeforderte Seite konnte leider nicht gefunden werden.
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:10:26PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:15:11PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> > O'Neill's are those nasty fake Irish pubs aren't they?
> ^---^ ^^
> That's an oxymoron, isn't it? I was under the impression that fake
Pulled from Nicholas Clark's mail (Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:10:26PM +0100):
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:15:11PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> > O'Neill's are those nasty fake Irish pubs aren't they?
> ^---^ ^^
>
> That's an oxymoron, isn't it? I was under the impres
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:15:11PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> O'Neill's are those nasty fake Irish pubs aren't they?
^---^ ^^
That's an oxymoron, isn't it? I was under the impression that fake Irish pubs
were not nice by definition.
Caffreys - brewed in Ireland s
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 01:49:34PM +0100, Paul Mison wrote:
> Otherwise, we could go back to the Doggett's for a meeting, or to the
> Founder's Arms, if people like the riverside atmosphere of the South
> Bank.
>
> Any other suggestions? Or should we simply go back to the Cittie of
> Yorke in Ju
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 12:41:50PM +0100, Kate L Pugh wrote:
> PS Grue has mentioned another possibility -- an O'Neill's pub in Earl's
>Court -- but we haven't set a date to check that one out yet. Maybe
>it is too far West though.
O'Neill's are those nasty fake Irish pubs aren't they?
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Andy Williams wrote:
> I'm looking into putting some graphs on our stats pages (mainly for the
> marketing people *sigh*) and so far have 2 options:
What are you looking to graph?
--
Conformity: When People are Free to Do as They Please, They Usually
Imitate Each Othe
> Personally I don't want to go the Coldfusion as it's just one more
> technology for me to support (and it isn't free) so the
> question is
> are there any others out there that you can recommend/have used/hated.
RRDTool.
http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/rrdtool/
N
--
12345
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:58:42AM -0400, Andy Williams said:
> I'm looking into putting some graphs on our stats pages (mainly for the
> marketing people *sigh*) and so far have 2 options:
> Mine - Use Template Toolkit and the GD::Graph plugins
> My Boss - COLDFUSION - uses Flash Generator in the
Hi,
I'm looking into putting some graphs on our stats pages (mainly for the
marketing people *sigh*) and so far have 2 options:
Mine - Use Template Toolkit and the GD::Graph plugins
My Boss - COLDFUSION - uses Flash Generator in the back end
Personally I don't want to go the Coldfusion as it's j
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:08:19AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
>
> for (my $last = -1; 30 < length and $last != length; $last = length) {
> s/_[^_]+$//;
> }
>
> for(;;). Heh.
>
> This still leaves the possibility of a long URL. Perhaps shortening it
> to a certain length first, then
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:49:33AM +0100, Nick Cleaton wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 04:30:56AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
> >
> > $story_name = lc $form->{title};
> > for ($story_name) {
> > s/\s+/_/g; s/\W//g; s/__+/_/g; s/_+$//;
> > s/_[^_]+$// until 30 > length;
>
* Kate L Pugh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> after the summer; people have been saying that they'd rather be
> somewhere that sunlight was actually visible, in the summer months.
> (Opinions? Send 'em to the (non-announce) list.)
>
The Anchor! I saw again The Anchor!
--
Greg McCarroll
On 03/05/2002 at 12:41 +0100, Kate L Pugh wrote:
>Glasshouse Stores ... I would think though that if
>we do like it, we might still want to put it on the back burner until
>after the summer; people have been saying that they'd rather be
>somewhere that sunlight was actually visible, in the summe
Leo has come up with a suggested alternative venue for meets -- the
Glasshouse Stores in Brewer Street, very close to Piccadilly Circus tube.
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/streetmap.dll?P2M?P=W1F9UJ&Z=1
We are going to check it out on Tuesday 21 May from 6:30pm. Please
come along and join us.
Leo has come up with a suggested alternative venue for meets -- the
Glasshouse Stores in Brewer Street, very close to Piccadilly Circus tube.
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/streetmap.dll?P2M?P=W1F9UJ&Z=1
We are going to check it out on Tuesday 21 May from 6:30pm. Please
come along and join us.
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 04:30:56AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
>
> $story_name = lc $form->{title};
> for ($story_name) {
> s/\s+/_/g; s/\W//g; s/__+/_/g; s/_+$//;
> s/_[^_]+$// until 30 > length;
> }
I think that'll loop forever if $story_name is a single
very long
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 12:41:09PM +0200, Newton, Philip
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> My web hoster recently sent me email saying that they were upgrading their
> formmail script on 13 May and urged all customers who had installed their
> own copy to do the same.
>
> I took the opportunity and s
I'm trying to build up a list of companies using nms to put on the web site.
Currently, I've got a number of ISPd who are recommending them to their
clients, but it would be nice to be able to lsit some "real" companies to.
Have you instelled nms scripts on any sites? And would they be happy to
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Simon Wistow wrote:
> Ideas?
Lose the ".html"?
--
s'' Mark Fowler London.pm Bath.pm
http://www.twoshortplanks.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
';use Term'Cap;$t=Tgetent Term'Cap{};print$t->Tputs(cl);for$w(split/ +/
){for(0..30
On the matter of reducing titles down automagically..
Be careful out there,
Recently I've been looking into a problem we've
been having with a system which indexes business
names using stopword lists(The list of common
words not to include) and porter-stemming (Which
reduces a word to it's commo
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:48:57AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> My first thought would be to do something like ...
>
> 1. Lower case the title
> 2. Strip out common words like and, a, but, and, like, or etc etc.
> 3. Convert spaces to underscores.
> 4. Check to see if that's unique, if it's not t
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 07:14:32AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> * Paul Makepeace ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > perl -lpe '$_ = sprintf "%.2f",$_; 1 while s/(?<=[\d])((?:\d{3})+)(?=[.,])/,$1/'
> >
> > Is there an easier way to do this? London.pm meeting taken its toll?
>
> Are you just looking
* at 03/05 11:48 +0100 Simon Wistow said:
>
> My first thought would be to do something like ...
>
> 1. Lower case the title
> 2. Strip out common words like and, a, but, and, like, or etc etc.
> 3. Convert spaces to underscores.
> 4. Check to see if that's unique, if it's not then add a number
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:48:57AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
>My first thought would be to do something like ...
>Or I could just ask the editor everytime.
I'd say both: do as you suggested (not forgetting to strip out all
non-alphanumeric characters as well), then present this to whoever's
ent
I really hate URLs that look like this ...
http://foo.com/exec/perl/show.pl?article=0665747&type=feature&leftad=real&show=1
I prefer Amazon who have something like
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B5ICAW/
which I presume is a rewrite of
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos?ASIN=B000
My web hoster recently sent me email saying that they were upgrading their
formmail script on 13 May and urged all customers who had installed their
own copy to do the same.
I took the opportunity and suggested the look into replacing their formmail
script not with Matt's 1.92 but with the nms of
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 12:29:57AM +0100, Shevek wrote:
> That web page appears to prove fairly conclusively that Java programmers
> do NOT have a sense of humour.
I like the Onion. It provides a much more cohesive and intelligent view of
the world than most things that issue forth from the US m
31 matches
Mail list logo
