I just saw a post in uk.comp.os.linux that used this syntax:
use strict qw($var);
to declare a variable. I was about to point out that the syntax was
wrong but, on testing, I find that it works (it creates a package
variable).
I can't find this documented anywhere. Did anyone else know about
At 09:58 +0100 11/14/02, Paul Johnson wrote:
Dave Cross said:
I just saw a post in uk.comp.os.linux that used this syntax:
use strict qw($var);
to declare a variable. I was about to point out that the syntax was
wrong but, on testing, I find that it works (it creates a package
variable).
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:58:43AM +0100, Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Dave Cross said:
I just saw a post in uk.comp.os.linux that used this syntax:
use strict qw($var);
to declare a variable. I was about to point out that the syntax was
wrong but, on testing, I find that
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:33:30AM +, Dave Cross wrote:
I may have missed something obvious. It was early when I ran these
tests :)
Yes, you are. It's just hit me what's happening. You're not turning on
strict at all (look at the value of $^H afterwards). It's the equivalent
of doing use
Dave Cross said:
#! /usr/bin/perl
use strict qw($x);
use warnings;
$x = 1;
print $x;
works without errors.
I may have missed something obvious. It was early when I ran these tests
:)
I think what you are missing is that Cuse strict qw($x); has done
nothing. The program is running
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002 5:16 PM, Michael Stevens
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Can anyone in the UK recommend a good solicitor for employment law,
preferably one with free time in the next 24 hours :)
I can't recommend a solicitor, but for useful information, check out
At 09:51 + 11/14/02, Lusercop wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:33:30AM +, Dave Cross wrote:
I may have missed something obvious. It was early when I ran these
tests :)
Yes, you are. It's just hit me what's happening. You're not turning on
strict at all (look at the value of $^H
The nominations for leader of London.pm closed on Sunday at noon, GMT.
In total, there were six valid nominations and five invalid nominations,
as well as two that missed the deadline. However, none of the seven
nominations that I did not count would have affected the outcome of the
nomination
Manning have asked me to be a technical reviewer for one of their (non
perl) books.
I have heard that other people on this list have done technical reviewing too.
Is it standard practice that technical reviewers don't get paid? I am happy
to do the review anyway because I run DiverseBooks.com
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:15:54AM +, Billy Abbott wrote:
This seems to be true, and they even happily admit it on their website.
http://www.stpetersbrewery.co.uk/index.htm?p=developt=htm
Your session has timed out.
Click here to re-enter the shop or return to the St. Peter's
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:34:06AM +, Alex McLintock wrote:
Manning have asked me to be a technical reviewer for one of their (non
perl) books.
Yay. Which one?
Is it standard practice that technical reviewers don't get paid? I am happy
to do the review anyway because I run
Hi All
On this subject, how do you get involved in reviewing books, as I'd love to
do this, be there financial gain or not?
Thanks
Neil Fryer
-Original Message-
From: Ben [mailto:ben;bpfh.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Technical
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:34:06AM +, Alex McLintock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Manning have asked me to be a technical reviewer for one of their (non
perl) books.
I have heard that other people on this list have done technical reviewing
too.
Is it standard practice that technical
: -Original Message-
: From: Alex McLintock [mailto:alex;OWAL.co.uk]
:
: Is it standard practice that technical reviewers don't get paid? I am
happy
: to do the review anyway because I run DiverseBooks.com but I'd like to
know
: that I am not being taken advantage of.
I've done
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 11:28:07AM -, Cal Henderson wrote:
: -Original Message-
: From: Alex McLintock [mailto:alex;OWAL.co.uk]
:
: Is it standard practice that technical reviewers don't get paid? I am
happy
: to do the review anyway because I run DiverseBooks.com but I'd like
Nicholas Clark sent the following bits through the ether:
Do the publishers that pay their technical reviews tend to get better
quality technical reviews than those who don't?
Good question. Personally the one thing I don't understand is why they
use so few tech reviewers. Surely you'd improve
At 11:01 14/11/02, Neil Fryer wrote:
Hi All
On this subject, how do you get involved in reviewing books, as I'd love to
do this, be there financial gain or not?
You ask me for review books and I bring them to a technical meet, or find
some other way of giving them to you.
Or You ask David
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Alex McLintock wrote:
Is it standard practice that technical reviewers don't get paid? I am happy
to do the review anyway because I run DiverseBooks.com but I'd like to know
that I am not being taken advantage of.
they asked me to do a tech review of one of their palm
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:04:31AM +, Paul Mison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Voting will open on Monday, 18th November at 12:00 GMT
I assume that any votes received before voting opens will be ruled
as invalid and therefore ignored.
Dave...
--
Drugs are just bad m'kay
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 03:14:42PM +, Kate L Pugh wrote:
I have a lightweight server serving static content and server-parsed
files, and proxying dynamic content through to a mod_perl server.
Unfortunately the server-parsed pages have '#exec cgi' directives in
them, and the mod_perl server
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:34:06AM +, Alex McLintock wrote:
Manning have asked me to be a technical reviewer for one of their (non
perl) books.
I have heard that other people on this list have done technical reviewing too.
Is it standard practice that technical reviewers don't get
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Kate L Pugh wrote:
PerlRequire /usr/local/apache_perl_ukps/startup.pl
PerlFixUpHandler Apache::SizeLimit
but after about 5--10 minutes of starting up the server, one of the
child processes has got all excited again and I have to go killing stuff.
You have to
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:34:06AM +, Alex McLintock wrote:
Manning have asked me to be a technical reviewer for one of their (non
perl) books.
I have heard that other people on this list have done technical reviewing
too.
Is it standard practice that technical reviewers don't get
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 11:01:01AM -, Neil Fryer wrote:
On this subject, how do you get involved in reviewing books, as I'd love to
do this, be there financial gain or not?
Tech reviewing for publishers? Good question. I don't remember how I got
started for all of the publishers. I
Thought this might prove interesting to someone - slides from a talk
given at .net ONE in Frankfurt on embedding the mono runtime. Being
able to embed a runtime in an Apache handler was used as an example
for being able to serve Asp.NET from there. There's also a tarball
containing an example
25 matches
Mail list logo
