Re: Perl jobs in London?

2003-02-24 Thread Simon Wistow
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:18:49PM +, Bill Corr said: > No, I'm not looking for a job, although I might be forced to in a few > weeks time. What I'd like to know is what the job market is like for > Perl programmers in the London area. Contrary to other answers I'd actually say it's not as ba

Re: repeating dates

2003-02-24 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:17:27PM +, Simon Wistow wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:26:14PM +, alex said: > > I wonder if it's possible to store the crontabs in an SQL table (with > > columns for seconds, hours, days, months and day of week) and construct > > an SQL statement that would

Re: Perl jobs in London?

2003-02-24 Thread Dirk Koopman
> Another way of looking at the job market: rather than "how many perl > jobs are there?" is "how can I find people who have a problem I can > solve with perl, and persuade I'm the person to do it?". From my > experience the latter technique yields orders of magnitudes more work > opportunities tha

Re: Perl jobs in London?

2003-02-24 Thread Paul Makepeace
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:18:49PM +, Bill Corr wrote: > No, I'm not looking for a job, although I might be forced to in a few > weeks time. What I'd like to know is what the job market is like for > Perl programmers in the London area. Depending on your personality type, one suggestion is to

Re: Perl jobs in London?

2003-02-24 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Monday 24 February 2003 22:18, Bill Corr wrote: > No, I'm not looking for a job, although I might be forced to in a few > weeks time. What I'd like to know is what the job market is like for > Perl programmers in the London area. > > Is working as a contractor a viable proposition, or am I delud

Re: CPAN

2003-02-24 Thread Dirk Koopman
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 21:24, Chris Benson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 04:14:27PM +, Dirk Koopman wrote: > > Two little CPAN questions:- > > > > 1. what command do you use (I presume in 'cpan') to tell what modules > > you have installed (with which version). > > ITYW: > perl -MCPA

Re: Perl jobs in London?

2003-02-24 Thread Lusercop
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:18:49PM +, Bill Corr wrote: [stuff] Just in reply to the subject: hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha -- Lusercop.net - LARTing Lusers everywhere since 2002

Perl jobs in London?

2003-02-24 Thread Bill Corr
No, I'm not looking for a job, although I might be forced to in a few weeks time. What I'd like to know is what the job market is like for Perl programmers in the London area. Is working as a contractor a viable proposition, or am I deluding myself? What sort of level of experience is generally t

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-24 Thread Paul Makepeace
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:41:10PM +, Lusercop wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:08:22PM +, Paul Makepeace wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 05:49:49PM +, Lusercop wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:14:08PM +, Jason Clifford wrote: > > [ I'm such a DNS bad-ass] > > I think

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-24 Thread Lusercop
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:08:22PM +, Paul Makepeace wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 05:49:49PM +, Lusercop wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:14:08PM +, Jason Clifford wrote: > [ I'm such a DNS bad-ass] > I think both of you just volunteered lightning talks on your favourite > bi

Re: CPAN

2003-02-24 Thread Chris Benson
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 04:14:27PM +, Dirk Koopman wrote: > Two little CPAN questions:- > > 1. what command do you use (I presume in 'cpan') to tell what modules > you have installed (with which version). ITYW: perl -MCPAN -e autobundle > 2. some time ago someone kindly posted an UR

Re: get/put or read/write

2003-02-24 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 08:31:15AM -0800, Belden Lyman wrote: > Nicholas Clark wrote: > >On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:59:21AM +, Simon Wistow wrote: > >>I could change it to > >>==1234 or == 12345678 > >> > >>or to > >> > >>=~ m!^1234! > >=~ m!^1234(?:5678)$! would feel more defensive

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Call For Participation: March Techincal Meeting

2003-02-24 Thread Ivor Williams
From: Mark Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Call For Participation: March Techincal Meeting Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 13:03:20 + (GMT) Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > The next London Perl Mongers Tech meet will be held mid march, and I'm > looking for talks. > >

Re: Frontier::RPC2 and german!

2003-02-24 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 05:49:58PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote: > On 20 Feb 2003 at 16:16, Paul Makepeace wrote: > > > In the case where the vowel is alone and having its sound changed, > > the absence of an umlaut-enabled system an 'e' is appended to the > > vowel in question. (Munchen, Muenchen)

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-24 Thread Jason Clifford
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Paul Makepeace wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 05:49:49PM +, Lusercop wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:14:08PM +, Jason Clifford wrote: > [ I'm such a DNS bad-ass] /me sticks his tongue out and blows a raspberry! > I think both of you just volunteered lightni

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-24 Thread Paul Makepeace
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 05:49:49PM +, Lusercop wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:14:08PM +, Jason Clifford wrote: [ I'm such a DNS bad-ass] I think both of you just volunteered lightning talks on your favourite bits of DNS :-) Paul -- Paul Makepeace .

Re: Stokers Required

2003-02-24 Thread Natalie Ford
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:18:18 + (GMT), Mark Fowler wrote: > Congrats Robin, I think you just volunteered to organise this. Come up > with a plan (dates, times, venues.) And get back to to the list. If you > want any help with anything, let me know via email/msg/sms/carrier > pigeon. Um, is R

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-24 Thread Lusercop
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 05:33:51PM +, Paul Makepeace wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:14:08PM +, Jason Clifford wrote: > > I am unaware of any dns problems with .ORG name space. > Two weeks to delete a glue record, and it still hasn't happened. Is that > a separate issue from DNS too? I

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-24 Thread Paul Makepeace
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:14:08PM +, Jason Clifford wrote: > I am unaware of any dns problems with .ORG name space. Two weeks to delete a glue record, and it still hasn't happened. Is that a separate issue from DNS too? P -- Paul Makepeace ... http://pau

Re: Stokers Required

2003-02-24 Thread Mark Fowler
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Robin Szemeti wrote: > I think the technical term for this is "JFDI" ... :) ... anyway .. I say do > it. Its something we've talked about a lot in the past both on here and in > 'another place' .. there is mileage in it ... let the party commence. Congrats Robin, I think you

Re: Stokers Required

2003-02-24 Thread Ben
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 04:37:03PM +, Robin Szemeti wrote: > > I think the technical term for this is "JFDI" ... :) ... anyway .. I say do > it. Its something we've talked about a lot in the past both on here and in > 'another place' .. there is mileage in it ... let the party commence. I'

Re: get/put or read/write

2003-02-24 Thread Belden Lyman
Nicholas Clark wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:59:21AM +, Simon Wistow wrote: I could change it to ==1234 or == 12345678 or to =~ m!^1234! =~ m!^1234(?:5678)$! would feel more defensive to me, but I prefer the == 1234 or == 12345678 Any reason why (?:5678) isn't optional? =~ m!^12

Re: Stokers Required

2003-02-24 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Monday 24 February 2003 13:39, David Cantrell wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:19:56AM +, Mark Fowler wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Leon Brocard wrote: > > > I wonder if more people are interested in this kind of thing. Is > > > anyone interested in a weekly learning Perl evening? Perha

CPAN

2003-02-24 Thread Dirk Koopman
Two little CPAN questions:- 1. what command do you use (I presume in 'cpan') to tell what modules you have installed (with which version). 2. some time ago someone kindly posted an URL to a simple script which did the above and also installed stuff what was 'missing' or 'old' from a list. Could s

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-24 Thread Lusercop
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:14:08PM +, Jason Clifford wrote: > While the move to PIR has been a balls up that has not been down to DNS > or, indeed, anything to do with DNS at all. > The balls up has been to do with operation of whois which is a completely > separate service to dns. Thank yo

Re: repeating dates

2003-02-24 Thread Steve Keay
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 02:19:23PM +, alex wrote: > > i think what i'll do is just store the crontab line as a single text How about using bit fields to represent hour, minute, day-of-week, etc? You need a 64-bit int to store minutes, obviously. That would make it easy to find a match using

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-24 Thread Jason Clifford
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Paul Makepeace wrote: > > I think it still is. Most of the whois clients don't work properly > > (even asking org.whois-servers.net) let alone the fucked-up redirection > > that PIR.org use to redirect the whois back to the registrar. > > Don't you think, the fact that an acc

Re: Stokers Required

2003-02-24 Thread S Watkins
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Leon Brocard wrote: I wonder if more people are interested in this kind of thing. Is anyone interested in a weekly learning Perl evening? Perhaps something like reading through Learning Perl a chapter a week with assignments, a mailing list, and a real life meet every week. Th

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-24 Thread Dirk Koopman
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 14:57, Paul Makepeace wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:43:20AM +, Lusercop wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:23:21AM +, Paul Makepeace wrote: > > > I hear unofficially from a someone connected to ICANN that the PIR.org > > > changeover "was a disaster". > > > >

Re: Birthday drinks

2003-02-24 Thread Dirk Koopman
What you as well? How do you find being a fish then? On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 14:29, Leon Brocard wrote: > I'm getting older, again. This time I'm abandoning cosy Notting Hill > for drinks around my workplace in fashionable Hoxton. You're all very > welcome to pass by for a cocktail or two. > > Whe

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-24 Thread Paul Makepeace
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:43:20AM +, Lusercop wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:23:21AM +, Paul Makepeace wrote: > > I hear unofficially from a someone connected to ICANN that the PIR.org > > changeover "was a disaster". > > I think it still is. Most of the whois clients don't work prop

[ANNOUNCE] Emergency meet, The Windmill, Thursday 27 February

2003-02-24 Thread Kate L Pugh
We're going to check out another pub on our list of possibles for social meets - The Windmill, 6 Mill Street, Mayfair (just off Regent Street). http://grault.net/cgi-bin/grubstreet.pl?Windmill,_W1S_2AT http://www.streetmap.co.uk/streetmap.dll?G2M?X=529001&Y=180921&A=Y&Z=1 Young's pub, food so

Birthday drinks

2003-02-24 Thread Leon Brocard
I'm getting older, again. This time I'm abandoning cosy Notting Hill for drinks around my workplace in fashionable Hoxton. You're all very welcome to pass by for a cocktail or two. When: Wed 26th February 2002, 7pmish Where: Grand Central, 93 Great Eastern Street, EC2A 3HZ (Old Street tube

Re: repeating dates

2003-02-24 Thread alex
i think what i'll do is just store the crontab line as a single text field, then store the next occurrence (using http://search.cpan.org/author/PKENT/Schedule-Cron-Events-1.7/lib/Schedule/Cron/Events.pm). then when it occurs, deal with the event, and then calculate the next occurrence. alex --

Re: Stokers Required

2003-02-24 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:19:56AM +, Mark Fowler wrote: > On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Leon Brocard wrote: > > I wonder if more people are interested in this kind of thing. Is > > anyone interested in a weekly learning Perl evening? Perhaps something > > like reading through Learning Perl a chapter a

Re: repeating dates

2003-02-24 Thread Simon Wistow
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:26:14PM +, alex said: > I wonder if it's possible to store the crontabs in an SQL table (with > columns for seconds, hours, days, months and day of week) and construct > an SQL statement that would match events within a certain date range? my guess is that you have

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-24 Thread Lusercop
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:56:05AM +, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 09:44, Lusercop wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:58:58AM +, Robin Szemeti wrote: > > > ... MX records are not cached > > > (ie have no TTL) so that should work almost instantly > > What crack are you

Re: repeating dates

2003-02-24 Thread alex
[cc: to Sean Burke] On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 22:31, Joshua Keroes wrote: > Simon Wistow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there any modules on CPAN than can deal with Cron like repeating > > dates in any (sensible) way. > > Sean Burke wrote this script that explains crontabs in plain English. > It's

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-24 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 09:44, Lusercop wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:58:58AM +, Robin Szemeti wrote: > > ... MX records are not cached > > (ie have no TTL) so that should work almost instantly > > What crack are you on, and can I have some, please? > > Why is it that people find DNS so

Re: get/put or read/write

2003-02-24 Thread Simon Wistow
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:13:57AM +, Nicholas Clark said: > =~ m!^1234(?:5678)$! would feel more defensive to me, but I prefer the > == 1234 or == 12345678 Thanks, applied :)

Re: get/put or read/write

2003-02-24 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:59:21AM +, Simon Wistow wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:27:11AM +0100, Philip Newton said: > > On newer Perls you get 12345678 or 87654321 if you build with > > use64bitint IIRC. > > Yeah, I was ignoring the issue for the momennt, Well, there aren't that many W

Sat 15th March - DiverseBooks / DiverseDVD day

2003-02-24 Thread Alex McLintock
Alex McLintock & DiverseBooks.com party. Saturday 15th of March is my birthday. To celebrate we are having a "open house" party in 88 Poppleton Road, Leytonstone. From 12 noon to 12 midnight people are asked to turn up, submit a book or film review(*), take some review books, chat, and eat and

Re: get/put or read/write

2003-02-24 Thread Simon Wistow
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:27:11AM +0100, Philip Newton said: > On newer Perls you get 12345678 or 87654321 if you build with > use64bitint IIRC. Yeah, I was ignoring the issue for the momennt, I could change it to ==1234 or == 12345678 or to =~ m!^1234! I suppose --

Economists argue against copyright...

2003-02-24 Thread TSchutzerWeissmann
Title: Economists argue against copyright... I thought this might be of interest... http://www.reason.com/0303/fe.dc.creation.shtml Tom SW

Re: get/put or read/write

2003-02-24 Thread Philip Newton
On 24 Feb 2003 at 10:02, Simon Wistow wrote: >use Config; > >if ($Config{'byteorder' == 1234) { >return $LITTLE_ENDIAN; >} elsif ($Config{'byteorder' == 4321) { >return $BIG_ENDIAN; >} else { >carp "Unsupported architecture (probably a Cray or weird >

Re: Stokers Required

2003-02-24 Thread Dave Cross
From: Mark Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 2/24/03 9:19:56 AM On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Leon Brocard wrote: > >> I wonder if more people are interested in this kind of >> thing. Is anyone interested in a weekly learning Perl >> evening? Perhaps something like reading through Learning >> Perl a chap

Re: get/put or read/write

2003-02-24 Thread Simon Wistow
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 02:40:19PM +, David Cantrell said: > Why not supply both - both legacy methods *and* a method to set the word > length for all other methods. yeah, I'll probably do that. > How, BTW, are you detecting the native word size? This is hard to even > DEFINE on some syste

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-24 Thread Dirk Koopman
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 09:43, Lusercop wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:23:21AM +, Paul Makepeace wrote: > > I hear unofficially from a someone connected to ICANN that the PIR.org > > changeover "was a disaster". And they ought to know. They have caused several themselves... -- Please Note

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-24 Thread Lusercop
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:58:58AM +, Robin Szemeti wrote: > ... MX records are not cached > (ie have no TTL) so that should work almost instantly What crack are you on, and can I have some, please? Why is it that people find DNS so hard to do properly!? -- Lusercop.net - LARTing Lusers ev

Re: London List Weekly Summary 2003-02-17

2003-02-24 Thread Lusercop
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:23:21AM +, Paul Makepeace wrote: > I hear unofficially from a someone connected to ICANN that the PIR.org > changeover "was a disaster". I think it still is. Most of the whois clients don't work properly (even asking org.whois-servers.net) let alone the fucked-up red

Re: Stokers Required

2003-02-24 Thread Mark Fowler
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Leon Brocard wrote: > I wonder if more people are interested in this kind of thing. Is > anyone interested in a weekly learning Perl evening? Perhaps something > like reading through Learning Perl a chapter a week with assignments, > a mailing list, and a real life meet every

Re: lists.perl.org

2003-02-24 Thread Graham Barr
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 08:51:27AM +0100, Philip Newton wrote: > On 22 Feb 2003 at 21:54, Gabor Szabo wrote: > > > I have been trying to get a change in one of the listings > > on http://lists.perl.org/ for a couple of month now. > > > > I filled in the New List form and e-mailed the listmaster o

Re: Stokers Required

2003-02-24 Thread Leon Brocard
Earle Martin sent the following bits through the ether: > This whole self-teaching thing really isn't working out. Where can I hire > someone patient for one-on-one Perl lessons, and how much will it cost me? I wonder if more people are interested in this kind of thing. Is anyone interested in a

Re: get/put or read/write

2003-02-24 Thread Philip Newton
On 23 Feb 2003 at 12:06, Simon Wistow wrote: > 2. Should I provide legacy get_word and get_dword (or read_(d)word) > which give back 32 ints. Or should give back a native word size and give > method to force an n-bit architecture (there's already a set_endian > method) I think "native" words/dwo

Re: lists.perl.org

2003-02-24 Thread Philip Newton
On 22 Feb 2003 at 21:54, Gabor Szabo wrote: > I have been trying to get a change in one of the listings > on http://lists.perl.org/ for a couple of month now. > > I filled in the New List form and e-mailed the listmaster on > the feedback link but with no success. > > Is there anyone here with g