IMAP HILLWAY\ said:
Now... this works fine for almost every URL I can think of apart from 2:
http://www.acxiom.co.uk http://www.acxiom.com
These 2 both return 500 Internal Server Error but work fine if you go
to them with a browser!
bit of checking and it seems that they're using the
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Is one allowed to run very small low traffic mailing lists from
penderel? Come to that are there any FAQs guidelines on use of your
trusty penderel account?
I think I've suggested that all things penderel like should be evalutated
on a case by case
- Original Message -
From: Jody Belka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: URL wierdness...
IMAP HILLWAY\ said:
Now... this works fine for almost every URL I can think of apart from 2:
http://www.acxiom.co.uk
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:14:23PM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
Also, bear in mind that I've made public commitments in the past to moving
penderel over to siesta when it's ready. Be prepared for mailman to go
bye bye at some point, even if it technically possible to run them at the
same time.
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Paul Makepeace wrote:
I'm making the distinction between using another piece of software
(which you're advocating with sound reasons) and actually *un*installing
an existing, known working, mature piece of software others might wish
to use.
I was mearly implying that
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:57:37PM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
Be prepared for mailman to go bye bye at some point, even if it
technically possible to run them at the same time.
I was mearly implying that mailman would move from being something that is
very activly supported (as it is now) to
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Mark Fowler wrote:
In future I shall not bother warning people, less someone jumps down my
throat.
Excellent, it'll be an even more enchanting surprise for everyone when all
the other shells are pulled, and we all start using the perl shell.
Vaguely more on-topic though, I
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 11:02:43PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Whilst that doesn't cause mailman to become broken (as you point out), it
does mean that now two mailing list systems are being supported. Whilst that
support may be zero effort most of the time, as we all know the discovery of
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 23:27, Dirk Koopman wrote:
But the performance of the forking miniserver is a worry - I've
implemented a preforking version and although this is better the server
still melts.
Previously I've implemented this component using Java threads and I also
considered
A while ago I had a discussion in a pub[1] with various london.pm
people about how it would be interesting to have a record of
people's memories of the Golden Age of the Dotcom Boom in London.
A few months ago I started a discussion about it on the list
(see
Dirk Koopman wrote:
I hate to say this but, frankly, this is not (imho) a pure perl
application. I have spent quite a bit of time fiddling around with perl
as webserver type thing and done some benchmarks.
Me too!
I coded a few Perl implementations of the servers from Comer Stevens
[0]. The
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:53:08PM +, the hatter said:
That'd be handy. With mailman gone, I'm sure no one will need python any
more, anyway. We can get also get rid of sed/awk/grep/etc. Except all of
those which gnu configure and make require to actually make perl,
obviously.
Ah
Me too!
and me:
http://www.twoshortplanks.com:
:-)
a
I coded a few Perl implementations of the servers from Comer Stevens
[0]. The experience was extremely frustrating as performance stank and
under high load zombies always became a problem, whatever reaping code I
used. I guess
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Paul Makepeace wrote:
snip misunderstanding clearning up
And lo, it was proved once again that email sucks, and misunderstandings
happen when people like me write badly worded emails (twice, in this
case.) As I have stated many times before I is most defiantly crap.
Mark.
Damn. And I was going to do some work today, too...
Dave Cross wrote:
A while ago I had a discussion in a pub[1] with various london.pm
people about how it would be interesting to have a record of
people's memories of the Golden Age of the Dotcom Boom in London.
A few months ago I started a
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Nigel Wetters wrote:
Dirk Koopman wrote:
I coded a few Perl implementations of the servers from Comer Stevens
[0]. The experience was extremely frustrating as performance stank and
under high load zombies always became a problem, whatever reaping code I
used. I guess
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 12:32:41PM +0100, Shevek wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Nigel Wetters wrote:
Dirk Koopman wrote:
I coded a few Perl implementations of the servers from Comer Stevens
[0]. The experience was extremely frustrating as performance stank and
under high load zombies
17 matches
Mail list logo
