Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-13 Thread Jacqui Caren
On 12/12/2011 22:58, Simon Wistow wrote: This isn't meant to be a debate on where it's better or cheaper to live (especially since Leo has asked us to rename this thread) more the fact that I can imagine that it *is* more expensive to have a US based dev team. I blame evil, faceless

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-13 Thread Jason Clifford
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:58:29 -, Simon Wistow si...@thegestalt.org wrote: My health insurance premiums aren't much more than what I paid in NI back in the UK - about $100 a month I think. But in the US you have no cover once you stop paying so you need to factor in additional money to

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-12 Thread Peter Corlett
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 08:46:57PM +, David Cantrell wrote: [...] Of course, if your people are made of pure Awesomium then you might be OK with taking that performance hit because you're still coming out ahead despite your people being in Narsarsuaq and Tataouine compared to if you'd

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-12 Thread Jacqui Caren
On 09/12/2011 10:04, Aaron Trevena wrote: recruiters were telling candidates all sorts of things about why we weren't hiring them and it was very fraustrating when meeting people who apparently got turned down when nobody had even seen their CV. Hmm this explains a lot! Jacqui

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-12 Thread Adrian Howard
On 12 Dec 2011, at 11:49, Peter Corlett wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 08:46:57PM +, David Cantrell wrote: [...] Of course, if your people are made of pure Awesomium then you might be OK with taking that performance hit because you're still coming out ahead despite your people being in

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-12 Thread Richard Foley - WNBR Book Project
Let's also not forget the positive environmental, (and economic and health), effects from not having to sit in a car for an hour at both ends of the day. -- Ciao Richard Foley The WNBR Book Project http://www.naktiv.net/wnbr On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:49:11AM +, Peter Corlett wrote: On

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-12 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 11:42:14AM +, Smylers wrote: This is a followup to my post to the Perl jobs-discuss mailing list. Terrence picked it up here: http://livingcosmos.posterous.com/beware-of-net-a-porter-perl-jobs and the original can be found here: http://www.mail-archive.com

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-12 Thread Peter Corlett
On 12 Dec 2011, at 15:04, Adrian Howard wrote: On 12 Dec 2011, at 11:49, Peter Corlett wrote: [...] And there's another perspective: I'm prepared to offer a 20-40% discount on my usual daily rate if I don't have to waste several hours a day dragging my carcass over to an office in the arse

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-12 Thread Simon Wistow
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 08:49:16AM +0100, Richard Foley said: UK programmers are half the cost of US programmer? Wow, and I thought all the IT jobs were moving to India! Maybe it's time to move back to the UK, where the beer is warm and the girls are... That's not implausible. A good but

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-12 Thread James Laver
On 12 Dec 2011, at 22:16, Simon Wistow wrote: That's not implausible. A good but junior programmer in San Francisco is generally looking at a 100K USD salary which equates to about 65K UKP. Unless things have changed since I left London that would be high for a junior. Minus health

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-12 Thread Kieren Diment
On 13/12/2011, at 9:30 AM, James Laver wrote: On 12 Dec 2011, at 22:16, Simon Wistow wrote: That's not implausible. A good but junior programmer in San Francisco is generally looking at a 100K USD salary which equates to about 65K UKP. Unless things have changed since I left London

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-12 Thread Simon Wistow
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:30:28PM +, James Laver said: Minus health insurance premiums (and you'd want good cover, wouldn't you) for a start. And all of the other things you don't get included over there. My health insurance premiums aren't much more than what I paid in NI back in the

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-11 Thread Steve Mynott
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 07:11:58PM +, Paul Makepeace typed: I'm surprised you think food cheaper is cheaper in UK, unless you're comparing LIDL with Trader Joe's. Finding somewhere decent to eat requires some thought in London; requires no thought at all anywhere I've been in California

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-11 Thread Adrian Howard
On 11 Dec 2011, at 20:46, David Cantrell wrote: On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 05:23:40PM +, Adrian Howard wrote: On 9 Dec 2011, at 13:16, David Cantrell wrote: This idea that with the right magic pixie dust teleworking can be made to work regardless of the company, the colleagues, and the

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-10 Thread Steve Mynott
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 09:11:14AM -0500, Avleen Vig typed: US salaries (use payroll expense) is much higher than in the UK. Where in London I would pay a programmer or sysadmin about £45k - £55k, in New York I would pay at least $125k - $150k (about £78k - £93k). This sounds really great!

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-10 Thread Paul Makepeace
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:46, Steve Mynott st...@gruntling.com wrote: Until you realise that it's pretty much a wash. What does the final line mean? Six of one, half a dozen of the other. http://www.usingenglish.com/forum/english-idioms-sayings/25582-call-wash.html Paul

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-10 Thread Avleen Vig
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Steve Mynott st...@gruntling.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 09:11:14AM -0500, Avleen Vig typed: US salaries (use payroll expense) is much higher than in the UK. Where in London I would pay a programmer or sysadmin about £45k - £55k, in New York I

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Richard Foley
UK programmers are half the cost of US programmer? Wow, and I thought all the IT jobs were moving to India! Maybe it's time to move back to the UK, where the beer is warm and the girls are... -- Ciao Richard Foley http://www.rfi.net/books.html On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:54:58AM -0500,

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Rudolf Lippan
On Friday, December 09, 2011 at 02:23:22 AM, Avleen Vig wrote: Indeed. My impression of NaP was also that they're very good. Given that I know people there and have only heard good things (you know a company is good when people don't want to leave). So if you're a) good, and b) lucky and c)

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Rudolf Lippan
On Friday, December 09, 2011 at 02:10:22 AM, Aaron Trevena wrote: On 9 December 2011 06:54, Rudolf Lippan rlip...@remotelinux.com wrote: On Thursday, December 08, 2011 at 11:23:35 PM, Kieren Diment wrote: I suspect this is a symptom of the GFC rather than anything more sinister. I'm

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Uri Guttman
On 12/09/2011 02:58 AM, Rudolf Lippan wrote: On Friday, December 09, 2011 at 02:23:22 AM, Avleen Vig wrote: My understanding is that NAP had a very hard time finding people in the US---I know I passed their posts by before. I had serious concerns after talking to them, and the recruiter

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Raphael Mankin
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 02:23 -0500, Avleen Vig wrote: On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Aaron Trevena aaron.trev...@gmail.comwrote: [snip] At least here in the US, bypassing recruiters is the much preferred method. I don't know why they're still so heavily relied on in the UK. The agency does

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Leo Lapworth
Hi Raphael, I am very sorry to hear of your situation. That said, please could you give NaP a bit more time to get back to you before this discussion goes any further on a public list. Many thanks Leo (London.pm leader)

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Aaron Trevena
On 9 December 2011 08:10, Rudolf Lippan rlip...@remotelinux.com wrote: Your recruitment agent could well be telling porky pies NaP, are a Perhaps, but she seemed pretty willing to back it up... Hmm.. When at LOVEFiLM we had lots of recruiters telling fibs - we had an exclusive partnership with

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Adrian Howard
On 9 Dec 2011, at 07:49, Richard Foley wrote: UK programmers are half the cost of US programmer? Wow, and I thought all the IT jobs were moving to India! Cost of the developers is not the sole cost in building a team in another country ;-) Adrian -- http://quietstars.com

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Peter Edwards
I wouldn't put much faith in anything I didn't hear directly from a N-a-P employee on this matter. Hah. After chatting to NAP's HR person at YAPC::EU about a job, and then sending an email asking, and then a follow-up email checking why I hadn't heard anything, I gave up trying to do anything

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Jason Tang
they can clarify situation. Jason On 9 December 2011 03:13, Rudolf Lippan rlip...@remotelinux.com wrote: Good morning, Perl Mongers, This is a followup to my post to the Perl jobs-discuss mailing list. Terrence picked it up here: http://livingcosmos.posterous.com/beware-of-net-a-porter

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Dave Cross
Quoting Raphael Mankin r...@mankin.org.uk: The agency does the legwork, saving both the company time in going through lots of CVs, and the contractor in having to trawl through hundreds of company web sites looking for jobs. The agency centralises the billing so that the company has to deal

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Steve Mynott
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 10:13:49PM -0500, Rudolf Lippan typed: About six weeks ago, I was contacted by a recruiter and asked if I was interested in a team lead position in New Jersey, and so begins my story. I've no particular reason to defend NAP or doubt your story but publically

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Jérôme Étévé
On 9 December 2011 10:57, Steve Mynott st...@gruntling.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 10:13:49PM -0500, Rudolf Lippan typed: I've no particular reason to defend NAP or doubt your story but publically publishing complaints about recruitment doesn't strike me as professional. Well, to be

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Ian Knopke
Actually, I'm finding this quite informative. From what I've seen Net a Porter does quite a bit to maintain good relationships with the Perl community and I've heard a lot of good things about them in the past from friends working there. It sounds like the recruitment agency could be the real

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread James Laver
On 9 Dec 2011, at 10:57, Steve Mynott st...@gruntling.com wrote: I've no particular reason to defend NAP or doubt your story but publically publishing complaints about recruitment doesn't strike me as professional. Shit happens. Deal with it. We have all been messed around. Save the

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Smylers
-of-net-a-porter-perl-jobs and the original can be found here: http://www.mail-archive.com/jobs-discuss@perl.org/msg01469.html Hmmm, I thought one of the features of the job discuss list was that it isn't archived, but apparently it is. 1) That NET-A-PORTER was fully aware of the contract rate

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Kieren Diment
On 09/12/2011, at 22:25, Ian Knopke ian.kno...@gmail.com wrote: Actually, I'm finding this quite informative. The whole corporate behaviour thing is pretty interesting. When I do research on the topic, me and my ethics committee are generally pretty careful about the who and how we mention

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Zbigniew Łukasiak
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Steve Mynott st...@gruntling.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 10:13:49PM -0500, Rudolf Lippan typed: About six weeks ago, I was contacted by a recruiter and asked if I was interested in a team lead position in New Jersey, and so begins my story. I've no

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Will Crawford
On 9 December 2011 11:42, Smylers smyl...@stripey.com wrote: Rudolf Lippan writes: [...] 3) That NET-A-PORTER was aware that I let another opportunity go based    on my understanding that my employment was pending a 'final    signature'. [...] 4) That as a condition of final sign off [...] I

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Jones, Christopher
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Steve Mynott st...@gruntling.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 10:13:49PM -0500, Rudolf Lippan typed: About six weeks ago, I was contacted by a recruiter and asked if I was interested in a team lead position in New Jersey, and so begins my story. I've no

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Richard Foley
Quite right, careless phrasing, I shall re-work it: Building a team in the apparently UK costs half what it does in the US? Wow, and I thought all the IT projects were moving to India, (or Ireland...)! Seriously, if some of these managers could get their heads around leveraging the power of

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread James Laver
On 9 Dec 2011, at 12:51, Jones, Christopher c.jo...@ucl.ac.uk wrote: And anyway if NAP don't like this being made public, they should get their shit together and call the disgruntled parties to explain themselves. Alternatively, they equally have to accept that Shit happens. Deal with it.

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread David Cantrell
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:57:56PM +0100, Richard Foley wrote: Seriously, if some of these managers could get their heads around leveraging the power of telecommuting project teams, they'd not have to worry too much about the respective costs of having a team in any one country. This idea

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Christopher Jones
On 9 Dec 2011, at 13:10, James Laver wrote: On 9 Dec 2011, at 12:51, Jones, Christopher c.jo...@ucl.ac.uk wrote: And anyway if NAP don't like this being made public, they should get their shit together and call the disgruntled parties to explain themselves. Alternatively, they equally

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Avleen Vig
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Uri Guttman u...@stemsystems.com wrote: On 12/09/2011 02:58 AM, Rudolf Lippan wrote: On Friday, December 09, 2011 at 02:23:22 AM, Avleen Vig wrote: My understanding is that NAP had a very hard time finding people in the US---I know I passed their posts

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Avleen Vig
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Richard Foley richard.fo...@rfi.net wrote: UK programmers are half the cost of US programmer? Wow, and I thought all the IT jobs were moving to India! Maybe it's time to move back to the UK, where the beer is warm and the girls are... The true answer, of

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Avleen Vig
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Richard Foley richard.fo...@rfi.net wrote: UK programmers are half the cost of US programmer? Wow, and I thought all the IT jobs were moving to India! Maybe it's time to move back to the UK, where the beer is warm and the girls are... The true answer, of

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Jason Clifford
On 09/12/2011 13:10, James Laver wrote: You've never dealt with a vulturous recruiter, have you? Is there any other kind of recruiter?

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Avleen Vig
On Dec 9, 2011 8:22 AM, David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk wrote: On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:57:56PM +0100, Richard Foley wrote: Seriously, if some of these managers could get their heads around leveraging the power of telecommuting project teams, they'd not have to worry too much about

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Dominic Thoreau
On 9 December 2011 14:24, Jason Clifford ja...@ukfsn.org wrote: On 09/12/2011 13:10, James Laver wrote: You've never dealt with a vulturous recruiter, have you? Is there any other kind of recruiter? If had some dealings with a company I consider a good recruiter. Although in fairness, last

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Chisel
Hi there, I'm an employee at NET-A-PORTER. I've been asked to forward the response from our head of recruitment, which I've pasted in full below. I've also posted this to the Perl Jobs discussion list. (I was unable to continue the thread there as I wasn't a member of that list until earlier

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Uri Guttman
On 12/09/2011 09:08 AM, Avleen Vig wrote: On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Uri Guttmanu...@stemsystems.com wrote: On 12/09/2011 02:58 AM, Rudolf Lippan wrote: On Friday, December 09, 2011 at 02:23:22 AM, Avleen Vig wrote: My understanding is that NAP had a very hard time finding

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Uri Guttman
On 12/09/2011 09:32 AM, Avleen Vig wrote: Not entirely true. Telecommuting doesnt erect barriers, it results in different barriers which need ti be handled differently. I worked for a distributed company for almost to years. Since then I've worked from home for almost 18 months. It's not more

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Jason Tang
On 9 December 2011 15:14, Uri Guttman u...@stemsystems.com wrote: On 12/09/2011 09:32 AM, Avleen Vig wrote: Not entirely true. Telecommuting doesnt erect barriers, it results in different barriers which need ti be handled differently. I worked for a distributed company for almost to years.

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Rudy Lippan
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 04:09:00 -0500, Uri Guttman u...@stemsystems.com wrote: where did you get that figure? given the standard rate of 20% (and i know since i recruit) or even less, that would mean a salary of over 250k which is ridiculous but for a handful of perl hackers i know about

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Rudy Lippan
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:02:12 +, Leo Lapworth l...@cuckoo.org wrote: Hi Raphael, I am very sorry to hear of your situation. That said, please could you give NaP a bit more time to get back to you before this discussion goes any further on a public list. I just saw your email, and I am

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Uri Guttman
On 12/09/2011 10:36 AM, Jason Tang wrote: On 9 December 2011 15:14, Uri Guttmanu...@stemsystems.com wrote: On 12/09/2011 09:32 AM, Avleen Vig wrote: Not entirely true. Telecommuting doesnt erect barriers, it results in different barriers which need ti be handled differently. I worked for

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Uri Guttman
On 12/09/2011 10:48 AM, Rudy Lippan wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 04:09:00 -0500, Uri Guttmanu...@stemsystems.com wrote: i don't have a deal with NaP so i can't say anything about this blowup. but i wouldn't ever keep someone from taking the bird in the hand. it is unprofessional and #^#^@ed

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Rudy Lippan
Exactly. I have been lucky in that I have been able to pick and choose among positions. I may have damaged my reputation with some companies by posting, and I may have harder time finding work now. -r On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 12:46:41 +, Will Crawford billcrawford1...@gmail.com wrote: On 9

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER - END OF THREAD

2011-12-09 Thread Leo Lapworth
Hi All, Do continue discussing general recruiters, processes, remote working etc, but please start a new thread. Everyone has had a chance to comment on the specifics of this, including NaP. I think Rudy and NaP can now take this into a private discussion, we don't need a he said/she said back

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Chisel
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Rudy Lippan rlip...@remotelinux.com wrote: I just saw your email, and I am fine with that.  I await their response. I've shared NAPs response in this thread and on the Perl Jobs discussion list. [

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Richard Foley
I couldn't agree with you more, Uri. When anyone mentions Telecommuting, hackles seem to rise, it's like the religious wars between vi and emacs, perl and java, mac + windoze, linux + the rest of the world, etc. I've worked in many places both onsite and offsite, and both situations have pros

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Adrian Howard
On 9 Dec 2011, at 13:16, David Cantrell wrote: On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:57:56PM +0100, Richard Foley wrote: Seriously, if some of these managers could get their heads around leveraging the power of telecommuting project teams, they'd not have to worry too much about the respective costs

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Uri Guttman
On 12/09/2011 12:03 PM, Richard Foley wrote: I couldn't agree with you more, Uri. When anyone mentions Telecommuting, hackles seem to rise, it's like the religious wars between vi and emacs, perl and java, mac + windoze, linux + the rest of the world, etc. I've worked in many places both

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-09 Thread Paul Makepeace
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 14:11, Avleen Vig avl...@gmail.com wrote: The true answer, of course, depends on your definition of half. US salaries (use payroll expense) is much higher than in the UK. Where in London I would pay a programmer or sysadmin about £45k - £55k, in New York I would pay at

Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-08 Thread Rudolf Lippan
Good morning, Perl Mongers, This is a followup to my post to the Perl jobs-discuss mailing list. Terrence picked it up here: http://livingcosmos.posterous.com/beware-of-net-a-porter-perl-jobs and the original can be found here: http://www.mail-archive.com/jobs-discuss@perl.org/msg01469.html

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-08 Thread Kieren Diment
-posting, brevity, etc. On 09/12/2011, at 14:13, Rudolf Lippan rlip...@remotelinux.com wrote: Good morning, Perl Mongers, This is a followup to my post to the Perl jobs-discuss mailing list. Terrence picked it up here: http://livingcosmos.posterous.com/beware-of-net-a-porter-perl-jobs

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-08 Thread Avleen Vig
. And we're definitely up front about things! On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Rudolf Lippan rlip...@remotelinux.comwrote: Good morning, Perl Mongers, This is a followup to my post to the Perl jobs-discuss mailing list. Terrence picked it up here: http://livingcosmos.posterous.com/beware-of-net

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-08 Thread Rudolf Lippan
On Thursday, December 08, 2011 at 11:23:35 PM, Kieren Diment wrote: I suspect this is a symptom of the GFC rather than anything more sinister. I'm sorry you and your not-to-be colleagues appear to be friendly fire in this circumstance. I don't know if I buy that: 6 December 2011:

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-08 Thread Aaron Trevena
On 9 December 2011 06:54, Rudolf Lippan rlip...@remotelinux.com wrote: On Thursday, December 08, 2011 at 11:23:35 PM, Kieren Diment wrote: I suspect this is a symptom of the GFC rather than anything more sinister. I'm sorry you and your not-to-be colleagues appear to be friendly fire in

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-08 Thread Kieren Diment
On 09/12/2011, at 5:54 PM, Rudolf Lippan wrote: On Thursday, December 08, 2011 at 11:23:35 PM, Kieren Diment wrote: I suspect this is a symptom of the GFC rather than anything more sinister. I'm sorry you and your not-to-be colleagues appear to be friendly fire in this circumstance.

Re: Beware: NET-A-PORTER

2011-12-08 Thread Avleen Vig
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Aaron Trevena aaron.trev...@gmail.comwrote: On 9 December 2011 06:54, Rudolf Lippan rlip...@remotelinux.com wrote: On Thursday, December 08, 2011 at 11:23:35 PM, Kieren Diment wrote: I suspect this is a symptom of the GFC rather than anything more sinister.