Re: Hundredweight was Re: UK Money, again

2003-07-07 Thread Andrew Beattie
yobibyte. That's a big number To get my head round it, I recently did some math to put it in context. My head is too frazzled to reproduce the proof on a Monday morning, but within reasonable tolerences: If you were to store a yobibite of data on modern laptop drives, (say 70Gb capacity - that

Re: Hundredweight was Re: UK Money, again

2003-07-07 Thread Paul Johnson
Andrew Beattie said: On the other hand, if you were somehow able to store a byte of information in a single molecule, then you could store a yobibyte in a single cup of really hot tea. The problem would then become one of how you could use your laptop without spilling some of your data and

Re: Hundredweight was Re: UK Money, again

2003-07-04 Thread Alex McLintock
At 11:31 04/07/03 +0100, Peter Haworth wrote: Come to think of it, why aren't zetta and yotta the other way round? That way you'd at least get (e)x y z at the end, which would make some kind of sense. Cause zetta and yotta are greek letters and that is the order they come in the greek alphabet?

Re: Hundredweight was Re: UK Money, again

2003-07-04 Thread Roger Burton West
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 11:56:04AM +0100, Alex McLintock wrote: Cause zetta and yotta are greek letters and that is the order they come in the greek alphabet? At least that is what my greek teacher told me. http://www.ibiblio.org/koine/greek/lessons/alphabet.html He was, as you see, lying. R

Re: Hundredweight was Re: UK Money, again

2003-07-04 Thread Paul Johnson
Peter Haworth said: On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:28:07 -0400, muppet wrote: kbyte 1024 byte megabyte 1024 kbyte gigabyte 1024 megabyte +terabyte1024 gigabyte +petabyte1024 terabyte +exabyte 1024 petabyte

Re: Hundredweight was Re: UK Money, again

2003-07-04 Thread Tom Hukins
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 11:31:46AM +0100, Peter Haworth wrote: megabyte 1024 kbyte gigabyte 1024 megabyte +terabyte 1024 gigabyte +petabyte 1024 terabyte +exabyte1024 petabyte +zettabyte 1024 exabyte +yottabyte

Re: Hundredweight was Re: UK Money, again

2003-07-04 Thread Piers Cawley
Steve Mynott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Roger Horne wrote: On Fri 27 Jun, Philip Newton wrote: You have: cwt You want: Definition: hundredweight = 100 pounds = 45.359237 kg which sounds as if it *is* 100 somethings. But is wrong. There are 112 pounds in a hundredweight (or were when

Re: Hundredweight was Re: UK Money, again

2003-07-04 Thread Chris Devers
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Tom Hukins wrote: I wonder what the value should be for a trilobyte. /me, impressed by this riff, tries to pick up from there... $ grep 'byte$' /usr/share/dict/words presbyte $ dict presbyte 1 definition found From Webster's Revised Unabridged

Re: Hundredweight was Re: UK Money, again

2003-07-01 Thread Tom Hukins
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 06:44:55PM +0100, Steve Mynott wrote: GNU units has 'brhundredweight' defined whereas the FreeBSD 4.5 units(1) doesn't (and probably should). You've inspired me to write this simple patch, which is now waiting for the approval of a src committer:

Re: Hundredweight was Re: UK Money, again

2003-07-01 Thread muppet
On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 05:59 AM, Tom Hukins wrote: http://people.freebsd.org/~tom/tmp/units/ i've always loved the sound of yottabyte. yotta yotta yotta. anyway, i read these aloud to my wife: kbyte1024 byte megabyte 1024 kbyte gigabyte

Hundredweight was Re: UK Money, again

2003-06-30 Thread Steve Mynott
Roger Horne wrote: On Fri 27 Jun, Philip Newton wrote: You have: cwt You want: Definition: hundredweight = 100 pounds = 45.359237 kg which sounds as if it *is* 100 somethings. But is wrong. There are 112 pounds in a hundredweight (or were when I was at school). See