There was me expecting the net to be flooded with freeware web site load
testers that just GET a bunch or URLs and draw a graph of times taken.
Apparently I was wrong. I have discovered an impressive number of
unuseably bad Java applications and some very simple command line things
that mostly are
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
> Load testing
For what it's worth:
http_load - http://www.acme.com/software/http_load/
+ throttling (28.8KBps mode)
+ takes a list of urls
+ runs as a multithreaded (select based) process
+ from the same people that brought u
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
> There was me expecting the net to be flooded with freeware web site load
> testers that just GET a bunch or URLs and draw a graph of times taken.
> Apparently I was wrong. I have discovered an impressive number of
> unuseably bad Java applications an
"Jonathan Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There was me expecting the net to be flooded with freeware web site load
> testers that just GET a bunch or URLs and draw a graph of times taken.
> Apparently I was wrong. I have discovered an impressive number of
> unuseably bad Java applications
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 04:28:52PM +, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
> There was me expecting the net to be flooded with freeware web site load
> testers that just GET a bunch or URLs and draw a graph of times taken.
http://www.loadtesting.com/ (commercial)
http://www.pushtotest.com/ptt
http://www
On Wednesday, March 06, 2002 @ 4:28 PM, "Jonathan Peterson" did scribble:
| There was me expecting the net to be flooded with freeware web site load
| testers that just GET a bunch or URLs and draw a graph of times taken.
| Apparently I was wrong. I have discovered an impressive number of
| unuse
Pulled from Steve Norman's mail (Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 10:40:02PM -):
> On Wednesday, March 06, 2002 @ 4:28 PM, "Jonathan Peterson" did scribble:
>
> | There was me expecting the net to be flooded with freeware web site load
> | testers that just GET a bunch or URLs and draw a graph of times t
hipps wrote:
>
> Pulled from Steve Norman's mail (Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 10:40:02PM -):
> > On Wednesday, March 06, 2002 @ 4:28 PM, "Jonathan Peterson" did scribble:
> >
> > | There was me expecting the net to be flooded with freeware web site load
> > | testers that just GET a bunch or URLs
> Well, I will probably be beaten to a pulp for this but who cares :)
>
> I have been doing some load/stress testing against an IIS box over the
past
> couple of days using Microsoft Web Application Stress Tool
> (http://homer.rte.microsoft.com).
> OK, you will need a windows box to run the test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Paul Golds, who's really sorry about this bit added after his
> posts so is being remarkably quiet here..
Well, you could try adding sigdashes (a line consisting only of
dash-dash-space) after the body of your message, which will cause many email
clients to ignore the
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 06:47:18PM +0100, Newton, Philip wrote:
> However, you also suffer from what German Usenetters call "Kammquoting"
> ("comb quoting") -- that is, alternate long and short lines due to bad
FWIW --
It's referred to in RFC2646 as "embarrassing line wrap"
http://www.zvon.org/tm
11 matches
Mail list logo
