Hi Folks,
I've been asked to get a company in to help improve
our search engine ranking (which no one has even
considered in recent years). Does anyone have
any recomendations ?
Yea, I know the basics, meta tags, robots, links
I even get the concept of mini sites to feed traffic
but I really nee
Buy google keywords. Really.
--
David Hodgkinson, Wizard for Hirehttp://www.davehodgkinson.com
Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star http://www.deep-purple.com
All the Purple Family Tree news http://www.slashrock.com
Interim Technical Director, Web Architecture Co
> I've been asked to get a company in to help improve
> our search engine ranking (which no one has even
> considered in recent years). Does anyone have
> any recomendations ?
Write relevant and interesting content that encourages other
people to link to you.
N
--
Global Messaging Victor
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 03:23:16PM +, Leo Lapworth wrote:
> I've been asked to get a company in to help improve
> our search engine ranking (which no one has even
> considered in recent years). Does anyone have
> any recomendations ?
Yes, it's simple. Make sure that the content is relevant,
--GpGaEY17fSl8rd50
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
An entity claiming to be Clayton, Nik [IT] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
:=20
: > I've been asked to get a company in to help improve
: > our search engine ranking (
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 03:23:16PM +, Leo Lapworth wrote:
>
> > I've been asked to get a company in to help improve
> > our search engine ranking (which no one has even
> > considered in recent years). Does anyone have
> > any recomendations ?
>
>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 05:06:44PM +, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> Not true. You're in a chicken and egg situation. Google ranks by the
> number of people that link to you. How do people link to you unless they
> know you are there ?
Google does not rank purely by the number of people who link to yo
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 05:06:44PM +, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, David Cantrell wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 03:23:16PM +, Leo Lapworth wrote:
> > > I've been asked to get a company in to help improve
> > > our search engine ranking (which no one has even
> > > consid
> Perhaps that tells you something about heavily "designed" sites. I didn't
> make any special effort to make my sites search-engine-friendly, they just
> turned out that way because they weren't built by some overpaid crack
> monkey with three-quarter-length khaki trousers and an amusing T-shirt
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 02:33:09PM +, Leo Lapworth wrote:
> Personally I think that the site we have is the best estate agent site
> for London (notice I said best not prefect).
That may be the case. However, as a user, I'm not in the slightest bit
interested in which agent a property is lis
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 04:03:08PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 02:33:09PM +, Leo Lapworth wrote:
> > Personally I think that the site we have is the best estate agent site
> > for London (notice I said best not prefect).
>
> That may be the case. However, as a user
11 matches
Mail list logo
