On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 11:01:01AM -, Neil Fryer wrote:
> On this subject, how do you get involved in reviewing books, as I'd love to
> do this, be there financial gain or not?
Tech reviewing for publishers? Good question. I don't remember how I got
started for all of the publishers. I rem
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:34:06AM +, Alex McLintock wrote:
> Manning have asked me to be a technical reviewer for one of their (non
> perl) books.
>
> I have heard that other people on this list have done technical reviewing
> too.
>
> Is it standard practice tha
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:34:06AM +, Alex McLintock wrote:
> Manning have asked me to be a technical reviewer for one of their (non
> perl) books.
>
> I have heard that other people on this list have done technical reviewing too.
>
> Is it standard practice that technic
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Alex McLintock wrote:
> Is it standard practice that technical reviewers don't get paid? I am happy
> to do the review anyway because I run DiverseBooks.com but I'd like to know
> that I am not being taken advantage of.
they asked me to do a tech review of one of their palm b
At 11:01 14/11/02, Neil Fryer wrote:
Hi All
On this subject, how do you get involved in reviewing books, as I'd love to
do this, be there financial gain or not?
You ask me for review books and I bring them to a technical meet, or find
some other way of giving them to you.
Or You ask David Cant
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Leon Brocard wrote:
> Good question. Personally the one thing I don't understand is why they
> use so few tech reviewers. Surely you'd improve the book / catch many
> more typos if you used, say 20 tech reviewers, instead of the 5-10
> that most publishers seem to use.
While
Nicholas Clark sent the following bits through the ether:
> Do the publishers that pay their technical reviews tend to get better
> quality technical reviews than those who don't?
Good question. Personally the one thing I don't understand is why they
use so few tech reviewers. Surely you'd improv
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 11:28:07AM -, Cal Henderson wrote:
> : -Original Message-
> : From: Alex McLintock [mailto:alex@;OWAL.co.uk]
> :
> : Is it standard practice that technical reviewers don't get paid? I am
> happy
> : to do the review anyway because I run DiverseBooks.com but I'd
: -Original Message-
: From: Alex McLintock [mailto:alex@;OWAL.co.uk]
:
: Is it standard practice that technical reviewers don't get paid? I am
happy
: to do the review anyway because I run DiverseBooks.com but I'd like to
know
: that I am not being taken advantage of.
I've done technic
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:34:06AM +, Alex McLintock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Manning have asked me to be a technical reviewer for one of their (non
> perl) books.
>
> I have heard that other people on this list have done technical reviewing
> too.
>
> Is it s
nical Reviewer
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:34:06AM +, Alex McLintock wrote:
> Manning have asked me to be a technical reviewer for one of their (non
> perl) books.
Yay. Which one?
> Is it standard practice that technical reviewers don't get paid? I am
happy
> to do the revie
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:34:06AM +, Alex McLintock wrote:
> Manning have asked me to be a technical reviewer for one of their (non
> perl) books.
Yay. Which one?
> Is it standard practice that technical reviewers don't get paid? I am happy
> to do the review any
Manning have asked me to be a technical reviewer for one of their (non
perl) books.
I have heard that other people on this list have done technical reviewing too.
Is it standard practice that technical reviewers don't get paid? I am happy
to do the review anyway because I run DiverseBook
13 matches
Mail list logo
