irc dead?

2002-02-28 Thread Natalie Ford
is london.rhizomatic.net down? is dipsy alive again yet? I can't get onto rhizomatic this morning... -- Natalie Ford .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: irc dead?

2002-02-28 Thread Natalie Ford
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 08:55:57AM +, Natalie Ford wrote: is london.rhizomatic.net down? is dipsy alive again yet? I note that scribot is dead too :( I can't get onto rhizomatic this morning... As you can tell from the scribot comment above, i got onto grou.ch via irc.rhizomatic.net.

Re: irc dead? -- MISLEADING, IRC ACTUALLY STILL ALIVE

2002-02-28 Thread Jonathan Peterson
Natalie Ford wrote: via irc.rhizomatic.net. It is just london.rhizomatic.net, dipsy and scribot that are dead... That's _SO_ unfair. For a moment I actually thought my prayers had been answered and that irc was, finally, dead. Instead, the only thing that's died is one poxy server and a

Re: irc dead?

2002-02-28 Thread Simon Wistow
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 09:12:56AM +, Natalie Ford said: I note that scribot is dead too :( I can't get onto rhizomatic this morning As you can tell from the scribot comment above, i got onto grouch via ircrhizomaticnet It is just londonrhizomaticnet, dipsy and scribot that are

Re: irc dead?

2002-02-28 Thread Newton, Philip
Simon Wistow wrote: For future reference, one can always connect to bullfrog or irc.rhizomatic.net should the need arise. Isn't irc.rhizomatic.net a DNS round robin that includes london.rhizomatic.net? So I suppose it might take a couple of connections in the worst case, until you get an IP

Re: irc dead?

2002-02-28 Thread Paul Makepeace
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 12:10:16PM +0100, Newton, Philip wrote: Simon Wistow wrote: For future reference, one can always connect to bullfrog or ircrhizomaticnet should the need arise Isn't ircrhizomaticnet a DNS round robin that includes londonrhizomaticnet? I've seen times when

Re: irc dead? -- MISLEADING, IRC ACTUALLY STILL ALIVE

2002-02-28 Thread Natalie Ford
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 10:30:56AM +, Jonathan Peterson wrote: That's _SO_ unfair. For a moment I actually thought my prayers had been answered and that irc was, finally, dead. Instead, the only thing that's died is one poxy server and a couple of bots. I mean that's a bit like saying

Re: irc dead?

2002-02-28 Thread Mark Fowler
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Simon Wistow wrote: predicted : a future Mark will travel back in order to hunt down the big blue box in Mailboxe's rack. He'll find it quickly because it's the only big blue box in Mailboxes's rack. He'll realise that I was

Re: irc dead?

2002-02-28 Thread Peter Sergeant
For future reference, one can always connect to bullfrog or ircrhizomaticnet should the need arise Or if you're looking for something a little closer to home, grouch:6667 Alternatively, there's always http://ircclueballcom/ if you want a firewall-proof way to get online Isn't

Re: irc dead?

2002-02-28 Thread anathema
Peter Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: scatha (Austin, Texas) I always seem to end up connected to scatha. Maybe god hates me. -- http://www.the-anathema.org Sometimes I worry about becoming a success in a mediocre world. - Lily Tomlin

Re: irc dead?

2002-02-28 Thread Newton, Philip
Peter Sergeant wrote: Alternatively, there's always http://irc.clueball.com/ if you want a firewall-proof way to get online. That just connected me to token. Is that hardwired? So far, I've always used http://www.chickshardware.com/emb/mouselike/008846881x3.html (Mouselike IRC) which uses

Re: ircd (was Re: irc dead?)

2002-02-28 Thread Peter Sergeant
/me notices email domain assumes you're an/the op/admin? Which ircd does *rhizomaticnet/clueballcom run? I run grouch/grouchrhizomaticnet ircclueballcom is simply a wrapper script grouch runs hybrid, as do the other rhizomatic servers, and most of Efnet Do you get much aggravation and