Gyan –
Your comments are lengthy – I will start with some general explanation.
I believe that you are confused about the hierarchy between PDUs types and
scopes. If that were more clear to you, I believe many of your comments would
no longer need to be made.
PDUs are a container for sending pr
Hi Les & Peter
Thank you for the offer to join the Event Notification draft. I agree the
Event Notification draft is an innovative solution to the problem statement
presented by PUA using a new pulse PDU. I read through the draft and even
though it’s a major IGP change to add event notification,
Tony,
Thank you very much for the constructive feedback.
More questions to your suggestions are inserted below:
Linda
From: Tony Li On Behalf Of Tony Li
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 11:28 AM
To: Linda Dunbar
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Looking for feedback of using Flex Algo to adve
Hi Linda,
Thank you for your contribution. I have several comments:
1) I think you could abstract this out from 5G and have a much stronger
contribution. If I understand correctly, your goal is to route to optimal
instances of anycast load balancers. There’s nothing radio specific about that.
Hey Tom,
If you can't get this fixed, you know there are alternative Email services that
you could use for IETF work. We're not going to change the protocol name...
I'll make it a point to use "IS-IS" (with the hyphen) since that should be
easier to get removed from your ESP's filters.
Thanks,
From: Christian Hopps
Sent: 14 October 2021 13:13
Does it junk the mail if the one true and proper form is used: "IS-IS" (i.e.,
with the hyphen)? :)
Yes. That is what the thread about Prefix unreachable that Acee kicked off has
in the Subject: and it has junked about 60 of those for me. O
Speaking as WG chair:
Agree totally with Chris here.
Thanks,
Acee
On 10/14/21, 5:26 AM, "Christian Hopps" wrote:
> On Oct 14, 2021, at 1:25 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
wrote:
>
>
> The rest of your argument seems to be that we should move forward w the
PUA solution jus
Thanks Tom.
We will try to avoid use the coined abbreviation during the discussions.
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On Oct 14, 2021, at 19:16, tom petch wrote:
> Top posting for a different topic
>
> My ESP, one of the larger ones in the world, is classifying most of the LSR
> e-mails as junk.
Does it junk the mail if the one true and proper form is used: "IS-IS" (i.e.,
with the hyphen)? :)
Thanks,
Chris.
> On Oct 14, 2021, at 7:15 AM, tom petch wrote:
>
> Top posting for a different topic
>
> My ESP, one of the larger ones in the world, is classifying most of the LSR
> e-mails as
Top posting for a different topic
My ESP, one of the larger ones in the world, is classifying most of the LSR
e-mails as junk. Yes, I have reported them as not junk but doubt if it will
make a difference.
To me it is obvious that anything with that well known abbreviation that was
coined by
Hi, Christian:
We all know these principles.
Don’t you realize there are some preferences existing?
Let's focus on the solutions analyzes.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Message-
From: Christian Hopps
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 5:26 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsber
> On Oct 14, 2021, at 1:25 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> wrote:
>
>
> The rest of your argument seems to be that we should move forward w the PUA
> solution just because the draft has been around for a long time. Sorry, that
> isn’t a valid argument.
I sort of got this feeling as well.
>
Hi Acee,
On 14/10/2021 00:36, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Speaking from the deepest, darkest depths of WG membership:
Again, assuming that putting this unreachability information in the IGPs is a good idea,
here are the things I like an don't like about "IGP Event Notification"
I like the fact
Hi, Les:
I know you are the main person that guards the improvement of IS-IS protocol,
but the liveness of this protocol should be from various contributions.
I admire your opinions, but think you should be more flexible to hear/adopt
other options.
What I worry is that do we need the seemed
Greg,
On 13/10/2021 22:45, Greg Mirsky wrote:
Hi Les, et al.,
I've just read the draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-event-notification. Event
notification is usually viewed as the function of the Fault Management
OAM, not of a control plane protocol. Thus, I find the idea of using an
IGP protocol to distr
Tony,
On 14/10/2021 07:50, Tony Li wrote:
Les,
If you’re advertising loopbacks that are outside of the summarized
space, then you end up with reachability and liveness. Yes, there’s a
cost in scalability… it ain’t free.
the whole point is to summarize loopbacks of PE devices, so above wou
16 matches
Mail list logo
