t;> Cc: Christian Hopps ; lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; lsr-
>> cha...@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Guidance for IANA flags field registry creation.
>>
>>
>> Les,
>>
>>> I did (an admittedly casual) review of such fields in all TLVs defined
&
sr-...@ietf.org; lsr-
> cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Guidance for IANA flags field registry creation.
>
>
> Les,
>
> > I did (an admittedly casual) review of such fields in all TLVs defined
> > during
> the existence of the IS-IS/LSR WGs - which covers over 2
Les,
> I did (an admittedly casual) review of such fields in all TLVs defined during
> the existence of the IS-IS/LSR WGs - which covers over 20 years. I did not
> find a single occurrence where the flags field ever got extended.
draft-ietf-isis-te-app defines the Application Specific Link
.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Guidance for IANA flags field registry creation.
>
> Hi Les,
>
> This isn't a proposal, it is the guidance we have come up with based on what
> we read in the WG discussion.
>
> We were asked to make this call so
0, 2021 5:24 PM
> To: lsr@ietf.org
> Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org
> Subject: [Lsr] Guidance for IANA flags field registry creation.
>
> LSR WG,
>
> After going through the various emails on whether and when to allocate
> an IANA
e on the WG website?
>
> Les
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 5:24 PM
>> To: lsr@ietf.org
>> Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org
>> Subject: [Lsr] Guidance for
uot; which is
documented somewhere on the WG website?
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 5:24 PM
> To: lsr@ietf.org
> Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org
> Subject: [Lsr] Guidance for IANA f
LSR WG,
After going through the various emails on whether and when to allocate
an IANA registry for a flags field, the chairs do not believe we have a
strong enough consensus to choose a policy as of yet; however, we feel
we do have a rough consensus that would allow us to issue guidance.
After
