> > but the refresh rate is still set too high for my monitor.
> > Where can I change this?
> Also, in the /opt/ltsp/i386/etc directory, there is a file
> called 'lts.conf.readme' that contains a full list of the
> available entries.
>
I checked that file and there is a line
x_mode_0 = 800x600
I have two copies of lts.conf
One in
/etc/
and one in
/opt/ltsp/i386/etc
Changes to both seem to affect the way ltsp works.
Do they do the same thing?
Should I use one over the other?
Does one override the other?
Why are there 2?
Help
ChrisJ
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checke
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 14:34, Chris Johnson wrote:
> I have two copies of lts.conf
>
> One in
> /etc/
> and one in
> /opt/ltsp/i386/etc
>
The /opt/ltsp/i386/etc/lts.conf is the correct file. Is the other file a
link? That could explain the chanes to any effecting the system? check
with ls -l /e
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Chris Johnson wrote:
> I have two copies of lts.conf
>
> One in
> /etc/
> and one in
> /opt/ltsp/i386/etc
>
> Changes to both seem to affect the way ltsp works.
>
Chris you don't have two lts.conf files, you have just one file with an
additional link. what you see is normal, de
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Chris Johnson wrote:
> I have two copies of lts.conf
Actually, one is lts.conf and the other is ltsp.conf
>
> One in
> /etc/
This one should be 'ltsp.conf'
It is there mostly for when packages are installed, the location
of the ltsp root directory is specified.
> and
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Julius Szelagiewicz wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Chris Johnson wrote:
> > I have two copies of lts.conf
> >
> > One in
> > /etc/
> > and one in
> > /opt/ltsp/i386/etc
> >
> > Changes to both seem to affect the way ltsp works.
> >
> Chris you don't have two lts.conf files, you
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Don Burns wrote:
>
> Hi ltsp list.
>
> I'm back after a year or so, working on a new configuration of diskless
> clients. I've noticed a few things have changed and I am also trying to
> clean the cobwebs from my memory on how this stuff all works. Some help
> would be
Thanks to all that helped clear this up. I'll read it a bit more thoroughly
next time
ChrisJ
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.522 / Virus Database: 320 - Release Date: 29/09/2003
--
I've just installed a Linux box from the iso images for k12ltsp. It gave me
four options to choose from ltsp, workstation server and custom. I went for
custom and put loads of stuff on. However does anyone know if the LTSP
option does anything different to make setting up any easier? I'm trying
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 12:33, Jonathan Villa wrote:
> My company just received 2 Wyse Thin Clients (Winterm 5455XL). From
> what I understand so far, I need to install the required packages onto
> our Linux DHCP Server which will provide the Thin Client an image
> created by etherboot via a script
The LTSP option DOES make installation easier. A breeze, in fact. If
you've got the time, do the install again. Then it's "almost" as easy
as plugging in your first thin-client and powering it up.
Thanks,
Steve
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 08:44, Chris Johnson wrote:
> I've just installed a Linux box
Ken Yap wrote:
Make a skeleton directory so that when you create a new user they get a
new set of settings. You might want to make some of the config files
owned by root or even automatically overwritten by a system version.
But still that wouldn't work. If I need to set OO.org Graphics dir
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the response...
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Don Burns wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi ltsp list.
> >
> > I'm back after a year or so, working on a new configuration of diskless
> > clients. I've noticed a few things have changed and I am als
Sorry, the line in the previous email that read:
echo "This is a test" /tmp/dummy
Should have been
echo "This is a test" > /tmp/dummy
-don
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Don Burns wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Thanks for the response...
>
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Don Burns wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Thanks for the response...
>
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Don Burns wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi ltsp list.
> > >
> > > I'm back after a year or so, working on a new configuration of diskless
I tried the thing with netboot.
here i'm able to download and start the Kernel!
so i think:
the nic is not kaput ( i also tried different ones)
dhcp and settings are fine
the funny thing now is:
after the kernel configured the nic, the second DHCP request comes
and my second dhcp offer also comes
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Don Burns wrote:
>
> I see my problem. Since I am using pxe instead of PXELINUX, the kernel
> argument root=/dev/ram0 was not being passed to the kernel. So, I started
> with a fresh initrd from the ltsp distribution and set pxe to provide this
> argument. First hiccup i
I see my problem. Since I am using pxe instead of PXELINUX, the kernel
argument root=/dev/ram0 was not being passed to the kernel. So, I started
with a fresh initrd from the ltsp distribution and set pxe to provide this
argument. First hiccup is again the usage message from init (there is, by
So, it occurs to me that I'm trying to beat this with the wrong hammer.
Do you have any clues as to why I couldn't get PXELINUX to work? Perhaps
that would behave a bit better than using pxe.
-don
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Don Burns wrote:
>
> >
>
Ah... another kernel argument. init=/linuxrc . I was wondering what magic
was making linuxrc run even though I was not adding that command line
argument.
Ok.. I'm getting further. I'm not carefully setting the kernel arguments
to be just as they are in the pxelinux.cfg/default file:
ini
> the funny thing now is:
> after the kernel configured the nic, the second DHCP request comes
> and my second dhcp offer also comes, but the nic dosn't accept the
offer
> just like the problem with etherboot before
I assume this is with Netboot. If you are able to download the kernel
but can
> I assume this is with Netboot. If you are able to download the kernel
> but cannot get the nic to accept the dhcp reply it is possible that
the
> card has an incorrect irq. Ken responded to an issue I am having with
> one of my cards. Etherboot and probably netboot does not care about
the
> ir
Hello,
I have a client who we just set up LTSP for. It is working well except
for on minor issue.
GDM will not come up (we are running Ximian Gnome) unless a user is
logged into the server.
As long as a user is logged into the server everything is cool but
Any ideas on how to fix this?
S
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 09:44, Chris Johnson wrote:
> I've just installed a Linux box from the iso images for k12ltsp. It gave me
> four options to choose from ltsp, workstation server and custom. I went for
> custom and put loads of stuff on. However does anyone know if the LTSP
> option does any
Hi,
I'm getting this messages when I want to start my DHCP service.
*
Starting dhcpd: Internet Software Consortium DHCP Server V3.0pl1
Copyright 1995-2001 Internet Software Consortium.
All rights reserved.
For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/products/DHCP
Wrote 1 leases to l
Has anyone developed any metrics for determining LTSP
server requirements. I made some that seem to work
pretty well. But it's for memory and CPU, what about
disk performance? At how many simultaneously active
users should we require what kind of performance in a
typical office environment?
Ha
>To understand all this here a few questions:
>The eepro driver in the 2.4.22 kernel is from version 0.12c by aris
>is this the same driver which is used for etherboot?
No, Etherboot drivers are different from Linux drivers although usually
the Linux driver is used as a starting point. You'd have
> Timothy Legge may be willing to suggest some debugging code you can
try
> inserting to observe what's happening, but that's up to him.
>
As ken said, I might be willing, but first confirm whether that card
works in that PC under Linux. I have a similar problem with an old ISA
card and it is eit
> Timothy Legge may be willing to suggest some debugging code you can
try
> inserting to observe what's happening, but that's up to him.
>
As ken said, I might be willing, but first confirm whether that card
works in that PC under Linux. I have a similar problem with an old ISA
card and it is eit
Dear Dieter,
On Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:32 AM, you wrote:
> Are you sure your dhcp-server is running?
> rcdhcpd status
Yes, it is running. I can boot and login regular ethernet workstations
without problems.
> If it is running, send your dhcp.conf.
--- 8< --- [dhcpd.conf] --- [workstatio
hi...
i'm trying to use my Diskless Computer (DC) with LTS
(latest :: 3.0), when i start my Server (RedHat80
+NFS+TFTP+DHCP3) there isn't problem... but when i
try to start my DC, i only see :
"Caught SIGHUP"
... i'm using Ehterboot and, i can see the Linux
Kernel is loaded!!, the FS (NFS) is m
I am using the nasd sound daemon and so far have only got OpenOffice to play
any sound. Has anyone got anything else to work and if so could you point me
in the right direction?
kind regards
garry
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGee
32 matches
Mail list logo
