Re: [Ltsp-discuss] video problem

2003-11-15 Thread hazzmat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hazzmat, I've used lots of S3 cards with LTSP. You said you installed the ltsp_x336_s3 package. Did you also set XSERVER = XF86_S3 ?I'm guessing you did, but just figured I'd make sure. Yep. Adding swap via NFS won't help the video at all. it's only gonna help

[Ltsp-discuss] wierd behavior

2003-11-15 Thread andre azaroff
I just now started having a weird problem with my ltsp server. an hour ago i was running fine. everything worked. I logged out and now when I try to log back in my X on my client workstation recycles and takes me back to the login prompt. The logs on the server (I checked from the console) only

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] video problem

2003-11-15 Thread jam
Hazzmat, I've used lots of S3 cards with LTSP. You said you installed the ltsp_x336_s3 package. Did you also set XSERVER = XF86_S3 ?I'm guessing you did, but just figured I'd make sure. Adding swap via NFS won't help the video at all. it's only gonna help system ram. with only 1mb of vide

[Ltsp-discuss] LTSP and HT processor

2003-11-15 Thread grendel
Hi, can Linux kernel and so LTSP get useful from an HT Intel processor? Somone tells me that HT may even slow down some applications... so I'm a bit worried about buying something wrong. Thanks --- This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC

[Ltsp-discuss] video problem

2003-11-15 Thread hazzmat
Hello, I have just made my first experimental install of LTSP. The server is Mandrake 9.0 and I used rpms from sourceforge as they seemed to install OK. The etherboot nic is a tulip lne100 from diskless workstations with onboard bootrom. Between the ws001 (which is an old p166 desktop w/32 MB o

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Status of LTSP 4.0?

2003-11-15 Thread jam
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Barnowl wrote: > I have not been tracking LTSP 4 Dev. Does this mean that LTSP 4 > willship with the X server/client,TFTP and DHCP daemons as a package? > what will happen to the script based setup? LTSP does not include the tftp or dhcp daemons. those are expected to be on

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] Redhat becomes Linux Microsoft

2003-11-15 Thread wouter . debacker
An annual fee of $379 per machine to run Linux ??? Try Gentoo Linux (http://www.gentoo.org). It comes at the cost of downloading two ISOs and roasting them onto a CD-R. After that you install and upgrade packages whenever you feel like it over the Internet. Mind you, the install is done at the co

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Status of LTSP 4.0?

2003-11-15 Thread Barnowl
I have not been tracking LTSP 4 Dev. Does this mean that LTSP 4 willship with the X server/client,TFTP and DHCP daemons as a package? what will happen to the script based setup? Evan On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:01:35 -0500 (EST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Charles Marcus wrote:

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] slyslogd not working, XF86config "striking", security breached!!

2003-11-15 Thread Peter V. \(LTS\)
Tnx to [EMAIL PROTECTED], what about my 1-3 points? Can anyone help? They are also in RUNLEVEL 5. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Peter V. (LTS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 3:28 PM Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] slyslogd

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] slyslogd not working, XF86config "striking", security breached!!

2003-11-15 Thread jam
Peter, When you set RUNLEVEL = 3 on the workstation, you are running in diagnostics mode. This is NOT intended for normal use. Only for troubleshooting problems. Jim McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Peter V. (LTS) wrote: > Hi all, > thanks to every1 who will try to help me.

[Ltsp-discuss] slyslogd not working, XF86config "striking", security breached!!

2003-11-15 Thread Peter V. \(LTS\)
Hi all, thanks to every1 who will try to help me. terminal = t2 = 10.0.5.12 ltsp-serv = ltsp = 10.0.5.7 problems: 1. tftpd: read: Connection refused /var/log/syslog on ltsp_server: Nov 15 13:03:52 ltsp dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:0a:cd:01:9f:4d via eth0 Nov 15 13:03:52 ltsp dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 10

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Redhat becomes Linux Microsoft

2003-11-15 Thread M. Balakrishna Pillai
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:35:53AM -0800, Kevin Humphries wrote: > What impact will this major change have on LTSP? Will LTSP run on other > vender distributions of Linux just as well? Which vender would you recommend > I switch to as a replacement to Redhat? > Use Debian GNU/Linux. with rega

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Redhat becomes Linux Microsoft

2003-11-15 Thread jam
Hi > > While Fedora is great for the hobbist, it will not cut it for many > > comercial even small comercial operations do to the lack of > > "professional" support. And given some of teh bigs that have shown up in > > Fedora that are not present in RH9 this could possibly be a very big issue.

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] client Hung after downloaded the kernel

2003-11-15 Thread jam
Kien, Etherboot 4.5.8 is quite old. Too old in fact to load the latest LTSP kernels that have been tagged with more recent versions of mknbi-linux. But, there is a way around this. You can actually use the old Etherboot to load a newer version of etherboot that will then load the Linux kernel.