Re: [Ltsp-discuss] rdesktop lock ups

2009-04-30 Thread Job Cacka
" Providing you have a single gateway on your network, and providing it is set up as the default gateway in dhcpd.conf, and providing that gateway has the hosts properly defined (or dns set up), then it should just work." I totally understand, but this is an ideal situation. Maybe my experience ha

[Ltsp-discuss] ltspfsmounter

2009-04-30 Thread Robert Rebstock
Hi, I need to mount "ltsp LOCALDEV's" with the fuse option "allow_other" in order to share them via samba, remount them with clamfs etc. >From what I can tell "ltspfsmounter" is the right place for this to happen, and consequently the reason for my contacting this list. I am hoping someone might

[Ltsp-discuss] Jaunty very slow

2009-04-30 Thread Simon Schmidig
Hi, We had update our server to Jaunty / Ubuntu 9.04 and we observe different problems: * The CPU works now at 75% - before ~20% * The system-charge is now 4 or more - before ~1 or 2 * The work on the thin-client becomes very slow !!! (evolution - create a email: ~1min

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] rdesktop lock ups

2009-04-30 Thread Chris Roberts
On Wednesday 29 Apr 2009, Job Cacka wrote: > So after reading through your thread I would ask if you found any > documentation on how the routing should be setup. Specifically a best > practice for LTSP environments. I have seen other problems with LTSP > performance because we do not use an intern

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp backports

2009-04-30 Thread Chris Roberts
On Wednesday 29 Apr 2009, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > well, there haven't been any official Debian backports of LTSP, but i've > generally managed to maintain backports for the current Debian stable > release for most of, if not the whole cycle of of stable releases. And HUGELY appreciated it is, t