> The embedded nics are the worse. Sending some one a $20 NIC is one
> thing, a pc is quite another. I normally don't work on any drivers
that
> I don't have a NIC for so unless I buy an ASUS board (unlikely) or
> someone else writes the driver you are out of luck.
>
> The existence of the drive
> Eh he he, the "card" is on-board my new Dell inspiron, so you want me
to
> send you the card? Hmmm, well after considering it for a nano second
or
> two.. nah I don't think so, might hang onto my new toy for a while
> just the same thanks. But hey, I do understand your position re your
> los
Otherwise I'd put a ltsp (/opt/ltsp/i386) install on the HD (150 odd Mb) and
grub/lilo from that when needed.
Eh, Oh ok kinda didn't follow what you meant there but now I got it.
That's not a bad idea, kinda like a Claytons diskless workstation.
Doesn't really boot from the network but is still c
If there is enough interest in this card it could be supported in
Etherboot. These days (after spending a small fortune on NICs) I define
enough interest as someone willing to send me a card).
Eh he he, the "card" is on-board my new Dell inspiron, so you want me to
send you the card? Hmmm, well
> > I have a Dell laptop which I'd like to boot as an LTSP client but
> > rom-o-matic doesn't list a driver for the broadcom 440 10/100 card
that
> > is in it. Does anyone have any info that might help, (like maybe
it's a
> > re-badged chip set, ok ok but I can hope can't I? ;-)
> >
> > Under RH9.0
Pete
> I have a Dell laptop which I'd like to boot as an LTSP client but
> rom-o-matic doesn't list a driver for the broadcom 440 10/100 card that
> is in it. Does anyone have any info that might help, (like maybe it's a
> re-badged chip set, ok ok but I can hope can't I? ;-)
>
> Under RH9.0 i
G'day,
I have a Dell laptop which I'd like to boot as an LTSP client but
rom-o-matic doesn't list a driver for the broadcom 440 10/100 card that
is in it. Does anyone have any info that might help, (like maybe it's a
re-badged chip set, ok ok but I can hope can't I? ;-)
Under RH9.0 it uses the
