[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
> Thank you to everyone for your feedback. We're currently using SLES 10 sp1
> (SuSE Linux Enterprise Server), and are at some point going to have to move
> off of LTSP 4.2 in favor of a version that gets security updates.
Just being curious: did you ask SUSE/Novell? What
Thank you to everyone for your feedback. We're currently using SLES 10 sp1
(SuSE Linux Enterprise Server), and are at some point going to have to move
off of LTSP 4.2 in favor of a version that gets security updates.
CyberOrg: How hard is it for things to progress from OpenSuSE to SLES?
Jeremy
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 20.11.2008, 20:23 -0600 schrieb Peter Scheie:
>
> Oliver Grawert wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 20.11.2008, 10:08 -0600 schrieb
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> Are any distributions supporting LTSP 5 in their enterprise level
> >> offerings? Biggest thing that we're curious abou
Oliver Grawert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 20.11.2008, 10:08 -0600 schrieb
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> Are any distributions supporting LTSP 5 in their enterprise level
>> offerings? Biggest thing that we're curious about would be security
>> updates for more than 3 years.
>
> ubuntu LTS (8.04) get
Am Donnerstag, den 20.11.2008, 10:08 -0600 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Are any distributions supporting LTSP 5 in their enterprise level
> offerings? Biggest thing that we're curious about would be security
> updates for more than 3 years.
ubuntu LTS (8.04) gets support for 3 years for LTSP and
Are any distributions supporting LTSP 5 in their enterprise level
offerings? Biggest thing that we're curious about would be security
updates for more than 3 years.
Jeremy D. Young
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
O'Reilly Auto Parts
(417) 862-2674 x1858
---
: Chris Puttick; 'Mike Hjorleifsson '; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/3/03 3:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Commercial LTSP
Isn't this what the Mandrake mosix terminal server project is trying to
do for free? Can't wait to see what comes from it.
As for hardware, I'm thinki
ged with it (i.e. plug in extra
servers
>as your needs grow), then yes...
>
>Cheers
>
>Chris
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Mike Hjorleifsson
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 12/31/02 11:42 PM
>Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] Commercial LTSP
>Importance: High
>
>
tra servers
as your needs grow), then yes...
Cheers
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Mike Hjorleifsson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/31/02 11:42 PM
Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] Commercial LTSP
Importance: High
If someone were to provide a turnkey server with a neat little web
interface for LTSP
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Michael Marschall wrote:
> I did not realize Sun Ray's are a dead end. Has Sun stated they will no
> longer produce them?
I don't think they are dead yet, but it is a proprietary product,
so death is sure to follow at some point.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Michae
I did not realize Sun Ray's are a dead end. Has Sun stated they will no
longer produce them?
Michael Marschall
President
Pipeline Networks
2385 Executive Center Drive Suite 100
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Phone 561.962.2774
Cell 305.502.8959
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, John McCreesh wrote:
> I believe th
I believe the SunRay strategy is perceived as too high risk by
corporates who have had their fingers burnt by buying proprietary kit
which proved to be a technological dead-end.
See http://www.wohl.com/wa0284.htm for why I think LTSP is a much
better bet. The white paper referred to there eventu
-- Original Message -
> > > From: "Baeseman, Clifford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 9:53 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Commercial LTSP
> > >
> > >
&
an, Clifford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 9:53 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Commercial LTSP
> >
> >
> > > Well it is a great idea if you have a gig running on everything. We
&
o: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 9:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Commercial LTSP
>
>
> > Well it is a great idea if you have a gig running on everything. We
> > tried this on production machines one time and saturated the switches .
>
What were you running?
- Original Message -
From: "Baeseman, Clifford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Commercial LTSP
> Well it is a great idea if you have a gig running on every
gt; Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 8:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Commercial LTSP
>
>
> > I don't know what the sales of the Cobalt Qube (now owned by Sun) are.
> > It's operating in a similar space. If Sun's marketing hon
nt: Thursday, January 02, 2003 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Commercial LTSP
> I don't know what the sales of the Cobalt Qube (now owned by Sun) are.
> It's operating in a similar space. If Sun's marketing honchos had half a
> brain they'd be doing an 'Office Q
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, John McCreesh wrote:
> I don't know what the sales of the Cobalt Qube (now owned by Sun) are.
> It's operating in a similar space. If Sun's marketing honchos had half a
> brain they'd be doing an 'Office Qube' running LTSP, StarOffice, and
> Samba to provide MS-Office in a box
I don't know what the sales of the Cobalt Qube (now owned by Sun) are.
It's operating in a similar space. If Sun's marketing honchos had half a
brain they'd be doing an 'Office Qube' running LTSP, StarOffice, and
Samba to provide MS-Office in a box.
But they haven't, so they won't.
John
http://w
If it had a scaleable solution packaged with it (i.e. plug in extra servers
as your needs grow), then yes...
Cheers
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Mike Hjorleifsson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/31/02 11:42 PM
Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] Commercial LTSP
Importance: High
If someone were to
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Shane wrote:
> I would love to see it, but
> Will the chip, and MoBo manufacturers ever STOP the performance race,
> and bring the prices of current, or older units way DOWN.
> Without a source of CHEAP, medium performance boards, the whole point of
> server apps goes down the
I would love to see it, but
Will the chip, and MoBo manufacturers ever STOP the performance race,
and bring the prices of current, or older units way DOWN.
Without a source of CHEAP, medium performance boards, the whole point of
server apps goes down the tubes. It's all very well for schools, an
> If someone were to provide a turnkey server with a neat little web
> interface for LTSP and a list of compatible "terminal" equipment along
> with tech support do the folks on THIS LIST think people would by it ?
>
> Curious...
> Mike
Given that there is going to be a pretty significant push fo
If someone were to provide a turnkey server with a neat little web
interface for LTSP and a list of compatible "terminal" equipment along
with tech support do the folks on THIS LIST think people would by it ?
Curious...
Mike
---
This sf.net em
25 matches
Mail list logo
