Yea, I just read it too and was amazed at the complete lack of competence in
the company (actually, it looks like they have a few pro-Micro$oft engineers
who started slinging the FUD as much as possible to prevent themselves from
actually having to learn anything about linux.
Unfortunately, the
I just read this PPT file. It is nothing but lies and false information.
I question why any company would go to such an effort to do this. It's
clear to me that these people are suffering from a Fatal Deception
Error: ID10T
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 10:44 -0600, Petre Scheie wrote:
jackpc
Hi All:
We recently discovered JackPC (http://www.chippc.com/products/jackpc/). The
product looks really cool; its very small (fits into a standard single-gang
network box), uses little power (powered by PoE; uses only 5W), and appears
to be reasonably powerful. In addition, its in the nomral
This was discussed on the K12LTSP list a few months ago. The consensus seemed
to be
that while it's kinda neat technology, the company is pretty hostile to Linux.
Google for
jackpc site:www.redhat.com/archives/k12osn
and find the message with the link to their PPT presentation about how
Alvin Starr wrote
It would be a chunk of work but creating an ARM LTSP should be quite
doable and as for no PXE it is quite possible to put the ltsp kernel on
flash and boot it from there. We have had to do this to support wireless
PCI cards
I am working on an ARM based solution for a while
Are you building this system from scratch as in designing the main board and everything?
That seems like a lot of work. It could be great if you do find the funding.
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 12:45 +0100, Eckhard Jokisch wrote:
Alvin Starr wrote
It would be a chunk of work but creating an
Guys,
I think I can help with some of the questions raised in relation to the
jackPC. I had a quick look at the website and the CPU is a AMD Au1550
which is a SOC based on the MIPS32™ instruction set.
The biggest problem would be developing a Linux or NetBSD kernel that is
compatible with their
Just a heads up for those who may not have seen these..
http://www.chippc.com/products/thinclients/jackpc/
Definitly a very nice idea.
Does anybody have any ideas RE: LTSP compatibility?
Cheers
--
Alex Harrington - IT Support, Longhill High School
t: 01273 304086 | e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Freitag, den 04.11.2005, 11:15 + schrieb Alex Harrington:
Just a heads up for those who may not have seen these..
http://www.chippc.com/products/thinclients/jackpc/
Definitly a very nice idea.
Does anybody have any ideas RE: LTSP compatibility?
This looks like a nice-to-have on
Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:
Am Freitag, den 04.11.2005, 11:15 + schrieb Alex Harrington:
Just a heads up for those who may not have seen these..
http://www.chippc.com/products/thinclients/jackpc/
Definitly a very nice idea.
Does anybody have any ideas RE: LTSP compatibility?
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:
Am Freitag, den 04.11.2005, 11:15 + schrieb Alex Harrington:
http://www.chippc.com/products/thinclients/jackpc/
Does anybody have any ideas RE: LTSP compatibility?
This looks like a nice-to-have on the first moment. But: It will not
I then removed the flash disk, switched it on and up popped a boot menu
including a PXE option. :)
No guarantee this one will be the same, but it's worth a closer look.
I've approached the manufacturer about PXE option and have a phone-meeting
booked with one of their technical staff on
12 matches
Mail list logo
