On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 09:06:22PM -0500, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote:
> On 21/12/10 08:20 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
> > I had some success today. I got a fat client working after addressing
> > two issues:
> >
> > 1) Booting would hang on network-manager and/or
> > network-manager-dispatcher
Στις 21-12-2010, ημέρα Τρι, και ώρα 21:06 -0500, ο/η Jonathan Carter
(highvoltage) έγραψε:
> > 1) Booting would hang on network-manager and/or
> > network-manager-dispatcher.
> >
> Vagrant, did Debian strip away the fat client plugin switches? In Ubuntu
> the above is taken care of for the user.
Hi
On 21/12/10 08:20 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:57:03PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> more likely your LTSP chroot doesn't have the backported versions of
>>> ltsp-client*, ldm, and ltspfsd*:
>>>
>>> ltsp-info
>>>
>>> if the versions of ltsp-client*/ltspfsd*/ldm don
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:57:03PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > more likely your LTSP chroot doesn't have the backported versions of
> > ltsp-client*, ldm, and ltspfsd*:
> >
> > ltsp-info
> >
> > if the versions of ltsp-client*/ltspfsd*/ldm don't include ~bpo50, you
> > probably
> > d
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:57:03PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 09:10:55PM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 08:10:13PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:05:29PM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> > > > I haven't tried using LTSP
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 09:10:55PM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 08:10:13PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:05:29PM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> > > I haven't tried using LTSP fat client mode yet -- ltsp-server 5.2.4-2 in
> > > Debian backports doesn'
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 08:10:13PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:05:29PM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> > But today I tried
> > using a netboot image from Debian Live, and it was pretty nice. I'm
> > wondering how it compares to an LTSP fat client.
> >
> > The Debian Liv
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 08:10:13PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:05:29PM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> > I haven't tried using LTSP fat client mode yet -- ltsp-server 5.2.4-2 in
> > Debian backports doesn't seem to support that yet.
>
> it definitely has support for it
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 08:10:13PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:05:29PM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> > I haven't tried using LTSP fat client mode yet -- ltsp-server 5.2.4-2 in
> > Debian backports doesn't seem to support that yet.
>
> it definitely has support for it
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:05:29PM -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> I haven't tried using LTSP fat client mode yet -- ltsp-server 5.2.4-2 in
> Debian backports doesn't seem to support that yet.
it definitely has support for it, just not an explicit ltsp-build-client
commandline
option:
ltsp-build-c
I haven't tried using LTSP fat client mode yet -- ltsp-server 5.2.4-2 in
Debian backports doesn't seem to support that yet. But today I tried
using a netboot image from Debian Live, and it was pretty nice. I'm
wondering how it compares to an LTSP fat client.
The Debian Live solution works like t
11 matches
Mail list logo
