Did you install lsb-core only, or a selection or everything of the
lsb-packages?
I think lsb-core installed all that was necessary.
-
Patrick Rady
Administrator, npServ
NEW (Nonprofit Enterprise at Work) -
Sponsore
Hi Patrick,
Patrick Rady schrieb:
> Actually, I only use Ubuntu- which is based on Debian... so it could
> be the problem you are experiencing...
Even though I had these last two days neither memory shortage nor CPU
overload when the problems occurred, I'll simply give it a shot and
install the ls
8 Jul 2008 19:05:21 -0400
Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] LTSP5: Sporadic Performance lows on Client despite
Server capacity
Hi all,
I've got a strange scenario over here. - And I have no idea how to
further circle this problem for proper debugging.
My Server (2.6 GHZ Quad Core with 4 GB R
Hi Patrick,
Patrick Rady schrieb:
> I have found that there are certain conditions where acroread plug-in
> in Firefox will result in CPU being gobbled by rogue ld-linux.so.2
> processes. I got around this- after some research by installing lsb on
> the afflicted machine.
>
> This link refers to
Hi Tomasz,
Tomasz Lewicki schrieb:
> I recommend "htop" and "atop" (atop needs patched kernel - openSUSE's kernel
> is patched by default) to quickly find performance bottlenecks.
>
Didn't know htop yet. That looks cool and helpful. Thanks!
Stefan.
--
Stefan U. Hegner
<[EMAIL PRO
On Wednesday 09 Jul 2008, Stefan U. Hegner wrote:
> Save as optimizes for fast Web view
>
> Though this is likely to be only of minor importance.
I have seen Acroread using 100% CPU for each user when this option is
set. "top" would reveal this, though.
Do a Google on "Acroread cpu 100%" and
Hi Chris,
thanks for your ideas.
Chris Roberts schrieb:
> On Wednesday 09 Jul 2008, Stefan U. Hegner wrote:
>
>> Typical symtoms: Especially Acroread shifts to extreme slow motion and
>> icedove (thunderbird) takes ages to move mails from folder to folder.
>> Other software also feels signific
Chris Roberts napisał(a):
> On Wednesday 09 Jul 2008, Stefan U. Hegner wrote:
> > How would you guys go about debugging something like this?
>
> To state the absolute obvious (I don't know your level of knowledge), but
> the "top" command is phenomenal for finding out the issue if it is server
> re
On Wednesday 09 Jul 2008, Stefan U. Hegner wrote:
> How would you guys go about debugging something like this?
To state the absolute obvious (I don't know your level of knowledge), but
the "top" command is phenomenal for finding out the issue if it is server
related; doesn't help if you problem
On Wednesday 09 Jul 2008, Stefan U. Hegner wrote:
> Typical symtoms: Especially Acroread shifts to extreme slow motion and
> icedove (thunderbird) takes ages to move mails from folder to folder.
> Other software also feels significantly slower, but these two are the
> worst and most observed.
Anot
2008/7/9 Stefan U. Hegner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Typical symtoms: Especially Acroread shifts to extreme slow motion and
> icedove (thunderbird) takes ages to move mails from folder to folder.
> Other software also feels significantly slower, but these two are the
> worst and most observed.
>
> Afte
Hi all,
I've got a strange scenario over here. - And I have no idea how to
further circle this problem for proper debugging.
My Server (2.6 GHZ Quad Core with 4 GB Ram on Etch/amd64) has plenty of
power. But occasionaly The performance on the clients plummets to
extreme lows. This happens even in
12 matches
Mail list logo
