ep 2001 07:02:41 -0500
From: "Jeremiah T. Moree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: "Jason A. Pattie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The reason
-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions
> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:21:54 -0400
> From: "Charles Marcus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> This is rather distressing
On Tuesday 25 September 2001 22:31, you wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Yes, that is exactly right. We'll use pam_ldap to handle authentication.
>
> This will be optional. NIS will also be supported, so you (as an
> administrator) can choose which authentication method you would
> like to use.
I've had pam
> Yes, that is exactly right. We'll use pam_ldap to handle authentication.
Beautiful!
_
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
Fo
Peter,
Yes, that is exactly right. We'll use pam_ldap to handle authentication.
This will be optional. NIS will also be supported, so you (as an
administrator) can choose which authentication method you would
like to use.
Jim.
Peter Rundle wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> When you talk about LDAP authe
Hi Jim,
When you talk about LDAP authentication is this in terms of replacing
NIS for local Apps?
I currently use LDAP authentication for the GDM login on the desktop,
(non-local apps). This is achieved via PAM. This is definitely the
preferred method for me as the pam_ldap module allows us to d
1:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions
Matt,
Yes, you should be fine. The 2.09pre releases are installed into /opt/ltsp,
whereas the older releases are in /tftpboot/lts.
So, they can both exist at the same time.
The files you will
rom: Jim McQuillan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:45 PM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions
>
>Charles,
>
>The announcement that Jason made a few day
Jim McQuillan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RE: LTSP-E 1.4 and recent LTSP versions
Charles,
The announcement that Jason made a few days ago was strictly about
his
Charles,
The announcement that Jason made a few days ago was strictly about
his 'Enhancements' package.
It does NOT indicate the direction of the LTSP project in general.
We are still planning on having LDAP based authentication. In fact,
Andrew Williams was working on that last week.
We are
Hi Jason,
This is rather distressing news for me, and I don't really see the rationale
behind it.
Everything Linux is moving TOWARD using OpenLDAP for a central user
authentication scheme - it is the only viable solution for single-sign-on
authentication.
If I was capable of doing the programmi
11 matches
Mail list logo
