> For my servers, I typically don't even run Xwindows.
I tried doing this by setting the runlevel of my RH7.1 server to 3, but
then I couldn't get xdm to start on my LTSP clients (the clients just
show the grey Xwindows screen with the X cursor).
Any clues pleas?
Thanks - John
On Thu, 2001-11
Hugo,
I do not run KDE because of the amount of memory it requires for each session
and also I cannot lock down the desktop (don't know how at the moment).
Instead I use IceWM -- very light weight resource wise, and is compatable
with gtk (gnome) applications and many qt (KDE) applications.
Thanks, I undestand better now, but what about KDE? I
would like to give my users the friendliest
environment posibble so I plan to let them use
StarOffice, Konqueror/Java, Kmail, Koffice, KDEgames,
KDE development environment, Xchat and Gaim. Is that
too much for my hardware? (P3-800-1Gb-40HDD_UD
Hugo,
The video card in the server has NOTHING to do with the video performance
on the workstations.
You could run a server with no video card at all, if you wanted.
For my servers, I typically don't even run Xwindows.
I would go for the absolute minimum video ram on the server, leaving that
r
The server's video card is absolutely irrelevant to the terminals.
Every terminal needs its own video card, which provides all video
features available to the terminal. No more, no less, as no hardware
can be/is shared...
So long,
Jürgen
___
I have a P3 LTSP server with 512Mb Ram shared with on
board video memory, I have the option to assign from
1mb to 32mb for video ram. I would like the best
performance on my terminals so how much ram should I
choose for video? How important is server video card
for overall performance of ltsp term
